Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That water is 323 feet in elevation, while
> the back of the Pyramids are only 282 feet. The
> straight line is for reference. A canal would
> follow a different path.
>
> I am convinced, water is no longer an issue. It
> was plentiful during the construction of the
> Pyramids.
>
>
There is only a single path it can follow and the ruins of a canal must be found at at least two points along that path.
There should be "obvious" ruins of the means that carried it across the wadi.
-------------------------------------------------------
> That water is 323 feet in elevation, while
> the back of the Pyramids are only 282 feet. The
> straight line is for reference. A canal would
> follow a different path.
>
> I am convinced, water is no longer an issue. It
> was plentiful during the construction of the
> Pyramids.
>
>

There is only a single path it can follow and the ruins of a canal must be found at at least two points along that path.
There should be "obvious" ruins of the means that carried it across the wadi.
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.