Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Clayton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ...
> > Look at what the stone pullers are proposing.
>
> ...
>
> Steve
>
> Your hypothesis is an inferior version of Frank
> Lohnrs except that you replace the "rope roll"
> with a wider girth rotating pulley or windlass
> contraption. (that's smart)
>
> The deficiency is that he has the weight of the
> pullers going down a steep slope (using their
> weight)
> You have them pulling but at the top say 120m they
> only have 36m space to haul by arm not by
> movement.
>
> So when the rock went up say to 72 m height,
> how did the rocks get taken to their specific
> place?
> YOU are going to say the AE dragged them there !?
>
> They didn't have an unworkable debunked funicular
> on top to the pyramid to place them . They hauled
> dragged them!
>
> They dragged them from the quarry too, or did they
> make a funicular to every part of the quarry?
>
>
> I think it (some aspects of your hypothesis) has
> some merit.
>
> But is get confused when:
> a) You are so innumerate such that you fail to
> understand that your proposed funicular cannot
> mathematically work (or had you forgotten?)
> b) you seek attention from sycophantic idiots
> (easily identified by all) with their own crazy
> theories to try to boost your fragile fantasy
> case.
>
> Yeah bored goodbye.
>
> But for curiosity, and all others sake, answer the
> bolded question please!?
> Cheers


I see 4 Non-Answers to 1 simple question.

Rock was shoved, levered, pulled and pushed.
Non of this is an any way possible without some DEGREE!!!! of inclined plane technology.

whether water ( or any other force) was employed or not...

rock was still shoved, levered, pulled, and pushed.

Warwick