Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
...
> Look at what the stone pullers are proposing.

...

Steve

Your hypothesis is an inferior version of Frank Lohnrs except that you replace the "rope roll" with a wider girth rotating pulley or windlass contraption. (that's smart)

The deficiency is that he has the weight of the pullers going down a steep slope (using their weight)
You have them pulling but at the top say 120m they only have 36m space to haul by arm not by movement.

So when the rock went up say to 72 m height, how did the rocks get taken to their specific place?
YOU are going to say the AE dragged them there !?

They didn't have an unworkable debunked funicular on top to the pyramid to place them . They hauled dragged them!

They dragged them from the quarry too, or did they make a funicular to every part of the quarry?


I think it (some aspects of your hypothesis) has some merit.

But is get confused when:
a) You are so innumerate such that you fail to understand that your proposed funicular cannot mathematically work (or had you forgotten?)
b) you seek attention from sycophantic idiots (easily identified by all) with their own crazy theories to try to boost your fragile fantasy case.

Yeah bored goodbye.

But for curiosity, and all others sake, answer the bolded question please!?
Cheers