Author: Thanos5150 ()
Date: March 13, 2020 11:45PM
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Thanos5150,
>
> I suspect you can back that 1% up?
>
> Where is your math, and how is it derived, and
> based on what facts?

G1, the largest user of non-Giza plateau stone, is around 7%. So if it makes you feel better then take that number and now you only have to deal with 93% instead of 99%.


Hi Thanos5150,

93% vs. 99%. You are missing the point. The point which you failed to address. If they only used 7%, why spend all that time and material building a Causeway.

10 years. I think it would have been quicker,  just to pull 100% of the stones up to the base of the Pyramids.  I suspect in 10 years, they could have accomplish that task.

So once more, why the Causeway? Explain why the needed two platforms with a lower middle section.