Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Author: Thanos5150 ()
Date: March 13, 2020 04:11PM
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
[i.imgur.com]
>
> Now, that looks more like fun, than work.
>
[i.imgur.com]
This has been talked about before, but again, the stone brought from the Nile would have been less than 1% of the total stone used for the 3 pyramids, let alone the temples and hundreds of mastabas, and yet it is the centerpiece of your scheme ignoring the other 99%.
Hi Thanos5150,
I suspect you can back that 1% up?
Where is your math, and how is it derived, and based on what facts?
And still, I contend it is easier to pull a stone downhill, than uphill. If not a Water Funicular, which fits the Causeway, then explain it's two ramps/platforms , with a lower middle section. Do you really believe they spent the better part of 10 years building a walking foot path? I doubt they had ADA requirements back then.
Your asking us to believe, they spent 10 years to build the Causeway, which likely contains more than the 1% you are referring too, so they could move 1%. up from the Nile?
Yes, it's been talked about before. Are you aware, most of the Topics here on GH, have been talked about before? What are you inferring?
Date: March 13, 2020 04:11PM
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
[i.imgur.com]
>
> Now, that looks more like fun, than work.
>
[i.imgur.com]
This has been talked about before, but again, the stone brought from the Nile would have been less than 1% of the total stone used for the 3 pyramids, let alone the temples and hundreds of mastabas, and yet it is the centerpiece of your scheme ignoring the other 99%.
Hi Thanos5150,
I suspect you can back that 1% up?
Where is your math, and how is it derived, and based on what facts?
And still, I contend it is easier to pull a stone downhill, than uphill. If not a Water Funicular, which fits the Causeway, then explain it's two ramps/platforms , with a lower middle section. Do you really believe they spent the better part of 10 years building a walking foot path? I doubt they had ADA requirements back then.
Your asking us to believe, they spent 10 years to build the Causeway, which likely contains more than the 1% you are referring too, so they could move 1%. up from the Nile?
Yes, it's been talked about before. Are you aware, most of the Topics here on GH, have been talked about before? What are you inferring?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.