Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "These walls are in ruins today so sayinh how tall
> they were is largely speculation. It is
> Egyptologists who have suggested they were very
> tall.
>
> If these walls were clad in tura limestone they
> would have necessarily been demolished when the
> water tight tura limestone casing was stripped
> from the pyramid. Logically these would be the
> first stones they hauled away. "
>
>
>
> -----> IF

Wow!!!

No ramps in museums > no problem
No pulleys in museums > problem
No gold or valuable chunk of tura lying about > problem

I suppose you actually believe they hauled away all evidence for ramps including the ramps they had to build over the tura limestone enclosure wall to haul away... ...well... ...tura limestone. Surely it would never occur to them to take the enclosure wall first!

The thought process of Egyptologists just elude me. Despite no evidence for ramps in the Pyramid Texts they clearly allude to canals and stopping leaks in them;

Utterance 279.

420a. To say: N., I have trampled the mud of the water-courses. Thot is the protector of N.,
420b. when it is dark, when it is dark.

How can every Egyptologist be blind to real evidence but understand everything by looking away?

It's just incredible that anyone can be so blind.