Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Steve Clayton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Warwick Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 24 x 365 x 20 =175200
> > > >
> > > > Allowing that my Magazine proposal was
> > > employed,
> > > > and upgrading my estimate to 1,752,000...
> > > >
> > > > We get 10 an hour
> > > >
> > > > Obviously the higher we go the less haul
> > teams
> > > > would be needed
> > > >
> > > > In the first 5 to 10 years we could have
> been
> > > > looking at far more an hour which
> > exponentially
> > > > accommodates slower rates as they got
> closer
> > to
> > > > the top
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The 10 per hour average has been voiced by
> > > > countless researchers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Feel free to question my estimates, they
> are
> > > just
> > > > that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Warwick
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > PS. Apply the same to 2 to 3 million
> > > > Maybe go for more time
> > > >
> > > > The numbers are mind numbing but not the
> > > > impossibility that so many Hobbyists like
> to
> > > > promote
> > > >
> > > > Warwick
> > >
> > > Hi Warwick,
> > >
> > > OK, well I commend you for taking the time
> and
> > > effort. I need to point out a few things,
> > though
> > > don't want to
> > > upset you. I'm trying to be constructive.
> > >
> > > Time study is a structured process of
> directly
> > > observing and measuring human work. This is
> the
> > > area that requires much work. Together,
> > hopefully
> > > we can agree to some decent numbers. Working
> > > backwards, we need to deliver a stone every 3
> > > minutes. In the beginning, it would be easier
> > to
> > > meet that rate, as you don't need to travel
> as
> > > far, as in later. That would comprise a large
> > > amount of stones. Building a big ramp could
> > take
> > > up materials and manpower, if no other better
> > > system was available and/or they lacked the
> > > knowledge of. Where you will run into
> > difficulty,
> > > is proposing pulling "single" stones up and
> on
> > > top, by any means. It would be better, if you
> > had
> > > more than one way up.
> > >
> > > Some questions? What size of a ramp do you
> > > envision, and is it a spiral ramp.
> > Additionally,
> > > how wide do your propose this ramp to be.
> >
> >
> > 1. I know exactly what a time study is.  what
> I
> > offered was a brief extempore demonstration of
> my
> > familiarity with all the challenges of the
> > project
> >
> > 2.instead of thinking RAMP, think ramping. One
> > ramp to do the whole thing is the most
> ridiculous
> > of the ramp suggestions whereas Houdins is the
> > most unnecessarily complicated.
> >
> > 3. The major ramp was, to my thinking that
> > line/angle/striking that is the base of the
> Grand
> > gallery.  from there internal inclines ( marl
> > filled steps).
> >
> > 4. while I have years of study research and
> filers
> > papers articles on the Pyramid age it has never
> > been my intent to be he who solves the problem
> to
> > everyone's satisfaction.
> >
> > 5.My intent is to attempt to isolate and
> > understand the motivation behind building it
> and
> > inspiring the work force
> >
> > food for thought:
> >
> > a.   the supplicants go to Lourdes the climb
> the
> > steps on their knees, or crawl.
> >
> > b. every now and then thru time groups of
> humanity
> > manage to be greater than the sum of their
> parts
> >
> >
> > Warwick
>
> Hi Warwick,
>
> If your time study is based on the proverbial 1
> stone every 3 minutes, which is the rate needed
> for a 20 year build cycle, then that condition
> limits many proposals.
>
> What would help, is to determine how many men
> would be required, for a given angle, to pull a
> 2.5 ton stone from bottom to top. By establishing
> several angles, you can then acquire a percentage.
> That percentage could then be attributed to any
> ramp angle proposed. I have relied on Franz
> Löhner calculations, thou (unless I missed it)
> only provided the men needed for a level pull, and
> a pyramid face pull, using the men's weight. We
> don't really know, how many men would be required
> at any angle/degree of a ramp, be it the Pyramid
> face or Spiral ramps. Have you ever seen anyone
> pull a 2.5 ton stone up a ramp for say 100 feet,
> and know how long that would take?
>
> [www.cheops-pyramide.ch]-
> roll.html
>
> Where as, the Funicular counter balance does
> contain accurate relationships of Incline Plains
> vs COF friction, and weight.  Two strange
> qualities, that I would have never guessed , is
> the fact that increasing the weight does not
> effect the COF. The fruition rate remains the
> same? The other quality being, as the weight moves
> down the incline, it increases in speed. It is not
> constant.
>
> I believe the Funicular was used and existed for
> several reasons.
>
> 1st. The 10 year Causeway build, is not necessary
> to pull stones up from the Harbor. A hard packed
> dirt path, with wood slates, lubricated with water
> or grease, would accomplish the same task. If that
> was the only reason for the Causeway, they would
> have lost precious time, and cost more in food. It
> would be a pointless endeavor, in time and
> effort.
>  
> 2nd. It replaces the majority of men need for the
> stone pull. 
>
> 3rd. The TV is full of individuals pointing to the
> miraculous AE, who drill holes in stones, and made
> saw cuts, polished stone to a high degree of
> accuracy, ect,ect...  Well, if they were that
> smart, then Funicular technology would be a snap.
> No problem. :)
>
> 4th. The time frame. As you and I are attempting
> to use Men, I suspect there is no senario to
> support them. If there was, it would have been
> revealed many years ago. Men have been trying to
> figure out, how those Pyramid were built, for many
> Centuries.


here's a question


what would you do with an idle work force 6 mos of the year?

Build a grandstand so they can watch the pyramid build itself?


Why do you insist, as the OP suggests that your solution requires one to disprove any other?

Proove yours.

Suggest for us how we can assist you in falsifying your theory.

What is the sense of alienating the very people who can assist you in finding the primary sources that are part of your solution?

"You guys are all wrong. What you suggest makes no sense."


That's what I hear



Warwick

Warwick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1619 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 273 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 262 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 252 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 233 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 249 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 238 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 234 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 248 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 226 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 231 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 233 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 239 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 224 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 218 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 219 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 222 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 224 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 219 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 219 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 209 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 203 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 208 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 177 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 209 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 212 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 196 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 190 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 204 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 207 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 200 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 205 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 202 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 190 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 204 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 202 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 192 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 201 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 206 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 205 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 215 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 198 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 200 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 200 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 200 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 190 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 206 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 208 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 207 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 186 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 194 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 235 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 221 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 195 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 200 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 195 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 203 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 196 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 202 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 192 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 184 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 196 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 191 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 196 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 218 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 205 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 193 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 197 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 189 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 201 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 210 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 233 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 200 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 218 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 212 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 214 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 205 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 199 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 207 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 206 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 195 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 189 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 193 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 181 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 217 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 217 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 207 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 194 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 197 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 204 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 179 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 212 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 178 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 194 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 186 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 205 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 195 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 196 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 189 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 187 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 197 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 186 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 188 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 194 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 178 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 199 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 192 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 202 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 190 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 214 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 203 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 203 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 198 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 186 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 194 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 184 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 169 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 182 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 165 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 187 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 167 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 161 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 183 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 181 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 174 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 169 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 165 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 166 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 162 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 186 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 184 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 168 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 160 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 175 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 188 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 185 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 182 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 176 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 182 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 171 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 203 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 167 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 179 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 177 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 171 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 176 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 189 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 177 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 165 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 180 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 170 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 182 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 181 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 174 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 160 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 194 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 177 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 180 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 186 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 175 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 197 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 198 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 193 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 185 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 182 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 174 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 174 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 193 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 164 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 183 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 168 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 184 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 172 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 187 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 200 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 186 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 169 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 187 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 183 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 188 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 181 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 183 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 182 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 195 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 170 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 190 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 181 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 176 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 182 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 178 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 206 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 192 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 204 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 211 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 171 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 170 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 147 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 138 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 143 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 165 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 181 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 153 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 138 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 144 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 145 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 147 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 135 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 155 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 143 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 140 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 142 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 133 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 179 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 145 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 163 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 132 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 134 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 129 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 152 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 137 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 123 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 143 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 131 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 142 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 126 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 147 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 133 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 122 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 119 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 136 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 118 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 146 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 123 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 141 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 126 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 128 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 109 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 121 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 122 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 134 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 136 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 131 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 110 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 131 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 111 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 135 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 128 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 136 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 112 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 131 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 135 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 157 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 164 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 183 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 141 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 140 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 168 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 146 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 208 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 165 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 152 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 162 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 162 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 149 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 140 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 162 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 144 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 147 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 156 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 141 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 142 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 145 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 146 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 146 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 143 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 180 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 164 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 127 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 154 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 156 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 125 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 132 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 151 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 131 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 148 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 138 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 138 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 163 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 148 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 142 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 144 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 130 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 144 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 150 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 139 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 156 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 134 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 158 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 135 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 153 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 156 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 155 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 167 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 146 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 157 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 139 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 135 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 153 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 156 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 137 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 279 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 138 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 147 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 138 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.