Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Steve Clayton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Warwick Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 24 x 365 x 20 =175200
> > > >
> > > > Allowing that my Magazine proposal was
> > > employed,
> > > > and upgrading my estimate to 1,752,000...
> > > >
> > > > We get 10 an hour
> > > >
> > > > Obviously the higher we go the less haul
> > teams
> > > > would be needed
> > > >
> > > > In the first 5 to 10 years we could have
> been
> > > > looking at far more an hour which
> > exponentially
> > > > accommodates slower rates as they got
> closer
> > to
> > > > the top
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The 10 per hour average has been voiced by
> > > > countless researchers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Feel free to question my estimates, they
> are
> > > just
> > > > that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Warwick
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > PS. Apply the same to 2 to 3 million
> > > > Maybe go for more time
> > > >
> > > > The numbers are mind numbing but not the
> > > > impossibility that so many Hobbyists like
> to
> > > > promote
> > > >
> > > > Warwick
> > >
> > > Hi Warwick,
> > >
> > > OK, well I commend you for taking the time
> and
> > > effort. I need to point out a few things,
> > though
> > > don't want to
> > > upset you. I'm trying to be constructive.
> > >
> > > Time study is a structured process of
> directly
> > > observing and measuring human work. This is
> the
> > > area that requires much work. Together,
> > hopefully
> > > we can agree to some decent numbers. Working
> > > backwards, we need to deliver a stone every 3
> > > minutes. In the beginning, it would be easier
> > to
> > > meet that rate, as you don't need to travel
> as
> > > far, as in later. That would comprise a large
> > > amount of stones. Building a big ramp could
> > take
> > > up materials and manpower, if no other better
> > > system was available and/or they lacked the
> > > knowledge of. Where you will run into
> > difficulty,
> > > is proposing pulling "single" stones up and
> on
> > > top, by any means. It would be better, if you
> > had
> > > more than one way up.
> > >
> > > Some questions? What size of a ramp do you
> > > envision, and is it a spiral ramp.
> > Additionally,
> > > how wide do your propose this ramp to be.
> >
> >
> > 1. I know exactly what a time study is.  what
> I
> > offered was a brief extempore demonstration of
> my
> > familiarity with all the challenges of the
> > project
> >
> > 2.instead of thinking RAMP, think ramping. One
> > ramp to do the whole thing is the most
> ridiculous
> > of the ramp suggestions whereas Houdins is the
> > most unnecessarily complicated.
> >
> > 3. The major ramp was, to my thinking that
> > line/angle/striking that is the base of the
> Grand
> > gallery.  from there internal inclines ( marl
> > filled steps).
> >
> > 4. while I have years of study research and
> filers
> > papers articles on the Pyramid age it has never
> > been my intent to be he who solves the problem
> to
> > everyone's satisfaction.
> >
> > 5.My intent is to attempt to isolate and
> > understand the motivation behind building it
> and
> > inspiring the work force
> >
> > food for thought:
> >
> > a.   the supplicants go to Lourdes the climb
> the
> > steps on their knees, or crawl.
> >
> > b. every now and then thru time groups of
> humanity
> > manage to be greater than the sum of their
> parts
> >
> >
> > Warwick
>
> Hi Warwick,
>
> If your time study is based on the proverbial 1
> stone every 3 minutes, which is the rate needed
> for a 20 year build cycle, then that condition
> limits many proposals.
>
> What would help, is to determine how many men
> would be required, for a given angle, to pull a
> 2.5 ton stone from bottom to top. By establishing
> several angles, you can then acquire a percentage.
> That percentage could then be attributed to any
> ramp angle proposed. I have relied on Franz
> Löhner calculations, thou (unless I missed it)
> only provided the men needed for a level pull, and
> a pyramid face pull, using the men's weight. We
> don't really know, how many men would be required
> at any angle/degree of a ramp, be it the Pyramid
> face or Spiral ramps. Have you ever seen anyone
> pull a 2.5 ton stone up a ramp for say 100 feet,
> and know how long that would take?
>
> [www.cheops-pyramide.ch]-
> roll.html
>
> Where as, the Funicular counter balance does
> contain accurate relationships of Incline Plains
> vs COF friction, and weight.  Two strange
> qualities, that I would have never guessed , is
> the fact that increasing the weight does not
> effect the COF. The fruition rate remains the
> same? The other quality being, as the weight moves
> down the incline, it increases in speed. It is not
> constant.
>
> I believe the Funicular was used and existed for
> several reasons.
>
> 1st. The 10 year Causeway build, is not necessary
> to pull stones up from the Harbor. A hard packed
> dirt path, with wood slates, lubricated with water
> or grease, would accomplish the same task. If that
> was the only reason for the Causeway, they would
> have lost precious time, and cost more in food. It
> would be a pointless endeavor, in time and
> effort.
>  
> 2nd. It replaces the majority of men need for the
> stone pull. 
>
> 3rd. The TV is full of individuals pointing to the
> miraculous AE, who drill holes in stones, and made
> saw cuts, polished stone to a high degree of
> accuracy, ect,ect...  Well, if they were that
> smart, then Funicular technology would be a snap.
> No problem. :)
>
> 4th. The time frame. As you and I are attempting
> to use Men, I suspect there is no senario to
> support them. If there was, it would have been
> revealed many years ago. Men have been trying to
> figure out, how those Pyramid were built, for many
> Centuries.


here's a question


what would you do with an idle work force 6 mos of the year?

Build a grandstand so they can watch the pyramid build itself?


Why do you insist, as the OP suggests that your solution requires one to disprove any other?

Proove yours.

Suggest for us how we can assist you in falsifying your theory.

What is the sense of alienating the very people who can assist you in finding the primary sources that are part of your solution?

"You guys are all wrong. What you suggest makes no sense."


That's what I hear



Warwick

Warwick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1568 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 248 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 235 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 226 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 209 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 223 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 209 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 209 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 224 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 201 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 202 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 206 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 214 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 194 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 194 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 194 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 188 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 198 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 189 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 187 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 182 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 177 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 181 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 153 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 183 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 182 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 173 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 176 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 179 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 175 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 178 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 178 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 165 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 176 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 178 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 172 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 175 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 178 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 175 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 171 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 174 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 173 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 171 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 166 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 175 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 184 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 181 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 160 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 172 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 206 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 193 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 170 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 174 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 174 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 174 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 160 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 169 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 166 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 171 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 193 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 174 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 174 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 167 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 183 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 208 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 174 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 192 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 185 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 187 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 180 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 172 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 174 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 181 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 168 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 161 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 192 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 193 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 181 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 169 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 165 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 153 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 183 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 154 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 169 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 162 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 173 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 172 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 169 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 172 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 163 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 170 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 152 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 173 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 166 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 178 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 163 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 184 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 175 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 175 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 162 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 168 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 147 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 158 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 143 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 147 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 144 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 140 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 161 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 161 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 155 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 152 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 146 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 147 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 134 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 166 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 156 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 143 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 142 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 150 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 162 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 165 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 156 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 156 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 163 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 149 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 146 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 152 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 150 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 164 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 150 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 145 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 159 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 148 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 160 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 154 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 154 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 142 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 166 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 156 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 152 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 176 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 176 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 168 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 165 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 160 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 153 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 155 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 168 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 161 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 152 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 153 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 166 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 154 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 158 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 155 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 162 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 162 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 161 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 164 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 161 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 156 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 157 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 155 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 154 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 156 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 161 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 152 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 158 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 184 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 169 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 183 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 192 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 150 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 127 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 119 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 123 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 137 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 159 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 127 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 119 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 123 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 126 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 128 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 105 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 130 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 122 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 120 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 119 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 159 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 126 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 141 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 112 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 115 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 112 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 132 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 110 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 104 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 124 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 111 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 122 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 108 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 125 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 114 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 103 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 101 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 116 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 97 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 126 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 103 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 115 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 104 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 100 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 91 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 100 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 103 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 112 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 116 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 109 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 92 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 109 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 93 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 115 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 107 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 114 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 93 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 112 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 115 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 131 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 140 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 162 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 119 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 119 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 119 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 177 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 145 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 133 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 142 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 126 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 129 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 118 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 140 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 125 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 127 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 130 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 124 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 122 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 122 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 128 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 122 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 124 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 152 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 143 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 106 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 132 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 136 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 103 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 110 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 128 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 109 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 127 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 114 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 117 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 136 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 125 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 123 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 122 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 112 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 122 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 131 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 116 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 129 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 116 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 134 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 133 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 136 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 124 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 124 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 128 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 118 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 112 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 141 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 133 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 128 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 213 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 131 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 118 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 126 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 119 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.