One of my problems getting through to people is that most people never even heard of a CO2 geyser. They've never heard of massive lakes in Africa exploding because they were heavy in CO2. Even those who have heard of them forget that our perception of such an event or condition would be wholly different than our ancestors since we value the experience where they would value the water. People forget that we can only understand what we perceive and we can only perceive what we believe. We see the modern equivalent of a geyser where ancient people an anomaly to study and observe.They saw a good source for cool effervescent water that could keep them alive and comfortable and we see just a lot of seltzer water.
Even geologists are mostly unfamiliar with CO2 geysers. Initially I tried to enlist the aid of some geologists to help me but in each case they told me there was no such thing as CO2 geysers!!! So obviously I'm on my own here. Then, of course, the search is complicated by the fact that these are completely dried up now and giant pyramids sit right on top of most of the key evidence that has never been sought. Despite the fact that some of the plumbing for these geysers has been found it is impossible to distinguish such conduits from any other caves.
Each time I use the word "geyser" people imagine some kind of "magic" I'm proposing. They imagine that it's impossible for there to be geysers in a desert or that the "ankh" is a representation of them. They imagine that geologists who never heard of geysers and have never been allowed to study the great pyramids and wouldn't be allowed to publish their findings even if they stumbled over them would have reported geysers by now. They imagine that Egyptologists are more concerned with finding the truth than furthering their careers.
On this last point some clarification is necessary. Obviously all Egyptologists want the truth but the problem is no Egyptologist can see any evidence outside of his assumptions that changeless and stinky footed bumpkins dragged tombs up ramps. Outside of these assumptions is where the truth lies but they are each and all trapped in a box they themselves have created. From inside this box only evidence that supports their beliefs is visible. Only their beliefs can exist. This is why they eschew science and the systematic application of modern knowledge to the study of the pyramids. They know it was ramps because they assumed it was ramps and now they've built an entire paradigm from it. Since it was ramps there is no need to even study the question. Why rock the boat when nothing can be gained?