Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> The Double Incline Plain science calculator is
> producing some interesting facts. For pulling
> stones up from the Harbor, the Funicular would
> need to carry nearly 3.8 times the weight of the
> other side. On a 5 degree causeway angle, the COF
> (coefficient of friction) would be 0.05 - 0.06.
> This is the range of becoming in balance, ie.
> reaching a State of Equilibrium. So basically,
> whatever the dimensions are of a Pyramid stone,
> you will need nearly 4 times it's volume in water
> weight, to pull it up the Causeway.

All else being equal the less steep the incline and longer the route the less efficient a funicular is. This can be an important consideration if water is limited or the ability to construct a proper funicular run is limited. No matter the source of the water it was seasonal and likely limited at least at times if not nearly continually. It seems highly likely that it was efficiency and water supply that were the primary limitations to just how large they could build. Pyramids got larger as efficiencies were learned and techniques perfected.

Needing four times the weight of stone in water is no problem, of course, providing they had it and such a significant drop in efficiency didn't come right off the top. I doubt more than 3% of all supplies arrived by the causeway so water usage for this specific funicular would be insignificant. It might have been some of the highest tech on site but water needs were limited.

> A 4 to 1 ratio. Increase the amount of stones
> needed, you need to build a vessel, 4 times as big
> in volume.

I picture the ascending "boat" (dndndr-boat) as nothing but a sled which would be dwarfed by the (henu boat) counterweight.

> The science calculator also provides the Tension
> involved,...

Cool.

> ...and the rate of speed it would travel.

Equally cool but remember these were primitive materials so acceleration would vary over even short distances.

> The rate of speed, increases as the process takes
> place. It is not a consistent speed.

This acceleration was nominal. Over a long period (a long run) even a small acceleration can result in significant speed so it is important but hardly concerning to engineers who grew up designing and operating these systems.

> They would
> need to bail water, to slow it down, and thereby
> maintain control.

This is hardly impossible but very unlikely. On the causeway it wouldn't matter too much if they ejected so much water that the system stopped short but it mattered a great deal on the pyramid because refilling the counterweight would cause lengthy delays and would be exceedingly dangerous. The primary danger being overfilling a a system not in its proper position resulting in extensive equipment damage. For this reason they would have used other means to brake the system. They would use a robust brake operated by the the filler (ferryman) and probably partly automatic. There are many ways this could be done without damaging the ropes. Once a system was in balance they'd never do anything to get it out of balance because primitive materials were very unforgiving.

> Doing so may have contributed to
> the erosion along side the Sphinx?

It would be a small contribution if they operated it in this manner.

> There is also
> an unexplained ditch, running down alongside the
> Causeway, and into the Sphinx encampment. It
> starts approximately midway down from the Upper
> Temple. Additionally, the rope tension increases
> the faster the vessels travel.

Really! I can hardly imagine the cause. Obviously there is a slight increase in tension on whichever boat is descending but total tension (the force pulling against the pulley) should be constant so long as the grade is constant, I believe.

> The Funicular
> system requires very few men to operate it.
> Gravity and water do the work.
>
> [youtu.be]
>
> geogebra.org/m/ZeZjAfta
>
> Working on it... the light could be better.
>
> [youtu.be]

Building pyramids was very very easy. Learning how to build pyramids was hard work that took three or four centuries to perfect. Modern people just have no idea and don't care that Egyptology doesn't really care how they were built so they invoke "ramps" and go back to parsing the Pyramid Texts in terms of modern abstractions and the "book of the dead". This is what we call "science" now days.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1520 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 234 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 223 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 210 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 193 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 209 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 195 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 194 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 205 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 185 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 189 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 192 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 198 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 178 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 182 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 179 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 181 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 174 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 172 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 162 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 136 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 167 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 165 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 160 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 160 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 161 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 161 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 159 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 162 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 158 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 163 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 159 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 158 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 161 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 159 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 151 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 160 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 166 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 167 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 147 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 152 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 189 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 179 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 162 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 157 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 158 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 148 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 155 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 151 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 176 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 161 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 159 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 155 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 191 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 159 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 178 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 175 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 159 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 153 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 147 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 177 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 175 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 166 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 153 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 143 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 166 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 140 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 151 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 144 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 158 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 154 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 156 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 153 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 155 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 159 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 165 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 160 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 163 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 147 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 152 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 135 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 145 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 134 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 131 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 127 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 147 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 136 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 132 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 132 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 122 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 152 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 142 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 131 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 130 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 135 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 151 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 143 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 148 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 134 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 141 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 131 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 145 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 151 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 136 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 135 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 131 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 132 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 146 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 135 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 143 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 141 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 128 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 152 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 137 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 162 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 145 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 139 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 142 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 155 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 132 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 134 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 170 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 153 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 170 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 138 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 113 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 106 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 113 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 123 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 144 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 106 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 109 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 95 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 110 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 105 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 107 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 99 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 142 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 127 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 94 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 100 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 95 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 116 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 94 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 90 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 97 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 108 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 94 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 101 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 88 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 90 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 102 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 84 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 112 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 87 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 100 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 91 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 88 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 79 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 89 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 87 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 99 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 104 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 92 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 80 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 94 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 83 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 100 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 91 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 98 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 80 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 99 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 102 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 112 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 124 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 144 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 106 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 108 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 108 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 161 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 105 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 113 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 113 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 116 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 106 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 128 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 115 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 110 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 107 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 114 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 109 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 136 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 130 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 96 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 118 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 121 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 91 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 96 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 97 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 111 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 102 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 102 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 120 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 109 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 105 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 109 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 100 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 110 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 103 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 117 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 101 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 123 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 112 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 112 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 103 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 98 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 111 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 112 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 194 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 107 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 112 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 104 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.