Simply stated my theory is nothing new but is rather a reinterpretation of all of the physical evidence put in a framework of logic and rediscovered by solving the Pyramid Texts in context while reverse engineering the great pyramids.
Everybody thinks they are so damn smart but the fact is that it has taken me more effort and thought to put this into words than it did to solve the language or deduce how the pyramids were built.
I KNOW I'm not very smart but people have NO easier time understanding this sentence than I did composing it.
I'm using tautology to make my points and NOT assertion. That all the evidence fits my theory is a simple fact and not an assertion. If there were any evidence that contradicts the theory it would have been trotted out by now. Instead people are simply repeating their interpretations of the evidence ad nauseum. People keep repeating their beliefs in superstition and magic rather than addressing the logic and facts.
I understand Egyptologists don't need no stinkin' facts about ramps and they certainly were getting along just fine before me. But they are still wrong and they will remain wrong until they incorporate science into their work.