Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Go to a wall(any wall will prolly do), and stand
> about 6 inches from it. Now, lean forward a
> little(I think it helps if you lean into it some).
> Now, rapidly bang your forehead against the wall
> ten or fifteen times(but you can go more if you
> think it will help)."
It feels like I've been banging my head for years and years. Getting through to people is pretty tough when what you're saying goes against every single one of their beliefs.
You are suggesting that these people might not have been stupid and ignorant. You are suggesting that maybe they used their heads to build instead of their backs. You are implying that they mightta been a lot smarter than Egyptologists and people today are convinced "evolution" is making us smarter and smarter. We have science don't we?
People find the concept that the ancients were capable and knowledgeable abhor ant and the fact you don't care if they were moribund and superstitious is irrelevant to this point.
You'll find on the net it's almost always better to give the other guy the benefit of the doubt. This is a difficult venue for parsing meaning.
> Cladking is not required to
> supply anything to back up his assertions.
As I've said numerous times, ALL of the evidence supports my theory and the fact that it has predictive value virtually proves the theory. Simply stated my theory is nothing new but is rather a reinterpretation of all of the physical evidence put in a framework of logic and rediscovered by solving the Pyramid Texts in context while reverse engineering the great pyramids.
This is simple enough but I can't draw that above paragraph in a simple CAD drawing. If you ignore the peanut gallery you just might find a thread to allow you to understand the theory. YOU don't believe ancient superstition matters but I do. It was by rediscovering ancient science that I learned to understand the ancient metaphysics; their language. Imagine my surprise when I discovered they had NO superstition and we DO!
If you aren't careful you can lose support. Most people on this site (other than the peanut gallery) are well intentioned and want you to succeed so give them the benefit of ANY doubt.
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Go to a wall(any wall will prolly do), and stand
> about 6 inches from it. Now, lean forward a
> little(I think it helps if you lean into it some).
> Now, rapidly bang your forehead against the wall
> ten or fifteen times(but you can go more if you
> think it will help)."
It feels like I've been banging my head for years and years. Getting through to people is pretty tough when what you're saying goes against every single one of their beliefs.
You are suggesting that these people might not have been stupid and ignorant. You are suggesting that maybe they used their heads to build instead of their backs. You are implying that they mightta been a lot smarter than Egyptologists and people today are convinced "evolution" is making us smarter and smarter. We have science don't we?
People find the concept that the ancients were capable and knowledgeable abhor ant and the fact you don't care if they were moribund and superstitious is irrelevant to this point.
You'll find on the net it's almost always better to give the other guy the benefit of the doubt. This is a difficult venue for parsing meaning.
> Cladking is not required to
> supply anything to back up his assertions.
As I've said numerous times, ALL of the evidence supports my theory and the fact that it has predictive value virtually proves the theory. Simply stated my theory is nothing new but is rather a reinterpretation of all of the physical evidence put in a framework of logic and rediscovered by solving the Pyramid Texts in context while reverse engineering the great pyramids.
This is simple enough but I can't draw that above paragraph in a simple CAD drawing. If you ignore the peanut gallery you just might find a thread to allow you to understand the theory. YOU don't believe ancient superstition matters but I do. It was by rediscovering ancient science that I learned to understand the ancient metaphysics; their language. Imagine my surprise when I discovered they had NO superstition and we DO!
If you aren't careful you can lose support. Most people on this site (other than the peanut gallery) are well intentioned and want you to succeed so give them the benefit of ANY doubt.
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.