Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "What numbers do you need? I have all of that.
> > Cladking is only supporting my concept."
> >
> > Hans' point is blatantly obvious to anyone who
> has
> > been paying attention.
> >
> > Cladking is ONLY supporting your concept
> because
> > it supports his obsession about Ramps.
> >
> > In 15years he is yet to present his MATHS.
> >
> > If you are willing to overlook that just to
> count
> > his support.....
> >
> >
> > Isn't that special
>
> Your entire post is special.
>
> I support funiculars because I believe that is how
> they built the pyramids. I support Steve Clayton
> because I believe most of his outline is plausible
> and he's brought a lot to the discussion.
>
> I don't need support to destroy "ramps" because
> "ramps" was never any sort of theory and were
> never established in ANY way. Indeed, I have
> debunked ramps and the fact Egyptology won't admit
> their error in no way changes this equation. They
> assumed there were ramps and the assumption has
> proven to be untenable. The contention that only
> ramps could have been used is wholly disproven.
>
>
> I ignore the poster because he ignores every point
> I make and/ or can't understand.
>
> The math to operate a teeter totter is too simple
> to bother to publish. If weight A is greater than
> weight B it goes down. If less than B it goes up.
> Thousands of generations of children have
> mastered the concept of a teeter totter even
> before they can add and subtract. If you don't
> understand how a funicular works you are not the
> audience I'm trying to reach.
Hi Cladking,
I couldn't have said it any better. Yes, Ramps are unproven and fail any close scrutiny. They are only for those who have a low IQ, and are too lazy or unable to do the math.
Fairy Tales are more appealing than the truth.
Ramps. LOL
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "What numbers do you need? I have all of that.
> > Cladking is only supporting my concept."
> >
> > Hans' point is blatantly obvious to anyone who
> has
> > been paying attention.
> >
> > Cladking is ONLY supporting your concept
> because
> > it supports his obsession about Ramps.
> >
> > In 15years he is yet to present his MATHS.
> >
> > If you are willing to overlook that just to
> count
> > his support.....
> >
> >
> > Isn't that special
>
> Your entire post is special.
>
> I support funiculars because I believe that is how
> they built the pyramids. I support Steve Clayton
> because I believe most of his outline is plausible
> and he's brought a lot to the discussion.
>
> I don't need support to destroy "ramps" because
> "ramps" was never any sort of theory and were
> never established in ANY way. Indeed, I have
> debunked ramps and the fact Egyptology won't admit
> their error in no way changes this equation. They
> assumed there were ramps and the assumption has
> proven to be untenable. The contention that only
> ramps could have been used is wholly disproven.
>
>
> I ignore the poster because he ignores every point
> I make and/ or can't understand.
>
> The math to operate a teeter totter is too simple
> to bother to publish. If weight A is greater than
> weight B it goes down. If less than B it goes up.
> Thousands of generations of children have
> mastered the concept of a teeter totter even
> before they can add and subtract. If you don't
> understand how a funicular works you are not the
> audience I'm trying to reach.
Hi Cladking,
I couldn't have said it any better. Yes, Ramps are unproven and fail any close scrutiny. They are only for those who have a low IQ, and are too lazy or unable to do the math.
Fairy Tales are more appealing than the truth.
Ramps. LOL
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.