Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> See Mark Lehner "Archeology of an Image" Ph.D.
> thesis page 140 citing Edwards (1985) that the
> pyramid causeway was called a ramp or Ra-st3w for
> "entrance of the haul".


You probably saw this but just in case others didn't "Rosteau" was used a single time in the Pyramid Texts;

Utterance 300.

445a. To say: O Hrti of Nsȝ.t, ferryman of the ’Iḳh.t-boat, made by Khnum,
445b. bring this (boat) to N. N. is Seker of R-Śtȝ.w.(Rosteau)
445c. N. is on the way to the place of Seker, chief of Pdw-š.
445d. It is our brother who is bringing this (boat) for these bridge-girderers (?) of the desert.

So your contention is that "Rosteau" means "Ramp Entrance" and this was the ancient name for Giza. I suppose it doesn't matter to Egyptologists what the name of Giza was before pyramid construction but "Ramp Entrance" or "entrance to the Haul" really doesn't fit. They wouldn't want a boat at the bottom of the ramp, they'd want another stone to drag. Why would "Seker of Spread Lake" desire a stone? Why would bridge builders want a stone or a boat? If they really wanted a stone to build a bridge why would they build one in the desert?

I suppose Egyptologists simply assume this is all metaphorical and symbolic bridges in and afterlife Giza. But I must ask, what do these rituals tell you about boats, seker, bridges, or anything else? How does translating Giza's name in this way make ANYTHING AT ALL more consistent OR understandable? Are you sure Egyptology is approaching an understanding of the means to build pyramids? How could achieve this without performing simple testing to determine the physical characteristics of any pyramid at all?

How is it even possible to falsify a magical interpretation of these words? How is it possible to show the original name for Giza was if the only name we have is "Ramp Entrance" or what also has been suggested is "Place of Ramps". Certainly the ramps didn't exist when the west side of the Nile between the Fayuum and Giza was first named. What was this name? Whatever the name was it could not possibly have been "Place of Ramps".

You tell me I'm wrong but the only evidence you have is interpretation of opinion and beliefs. Meanwhile I have their ACTUAL words that make literal sense. The water to operate Steve Clayton's funiculars or any of the hydraulic proposals had to get there somehow. This is WAY above the river so almost had to flow up out of the ground exactly as the PT literally suggests. With the pyramid a bridge to immortality and the boat the part of the funicular that drives it from Spread Lake it makes perfect sense. On this basis I suggest the ancient translators were correct (the ones before Faulkner who have been excommunicated) and the word means "Mouth of Caves" from whence the water that caused so much erosion emerged just as also described in the PT.

You are the one who wants to use words to win an argument. You want to embrace modern Egyptology. I can't embrace any of their ideas because no matter your disagreement you are dismissed as an amateur, a crackpot, or a splitter. You must embrace ALL of their ideas and even this is little help in getting your hypotheses considered or (God forbid) actually tested. I do not accept anything at all. It's so ironic that some of the early 19th century Egyptologists were on the right track but then they were suddenly excommunicated when Egyptology took a different turn.

Good luck but remember Hawass scoffs at the opinions of scientists. Some believe I do too but the fact is I treasure all expert opinion especially in the hard sciences. I simply know for a fact that no expert knows nearly as much as he thinks he does because this is the human condition. When we are right we are only right within parameters defined by perspective and the limitations of woefully incomplete knowledge. All else being equal experts are far more likely to be right than anyone else and Hawass is wrong to scoff. Obviously Egyptology is wrong to keep out scientific equipment, methodology, instrumentation, and knowledge.




You alluded to "workers of Roateau" or something like it. I've never seen such a thing. I am aware that Hawass reinterpreted something to mean "stone dragger" but never heard of a "ramp worker" and am very interested in it. I'd appreciate any sort of lead you could give me since there are still a couple jobs for which I've found no workers. One of them could certainly be mistranslated as "Chief of Ramp Workers".

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1382 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 204 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 192 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 181 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 164 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 183 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 165 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 172 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 159 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 159 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 167 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 164 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 149 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 153 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 151 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 137 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 152 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 146 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 139 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 136 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 133 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 140 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 108 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 140 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 134 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 125 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 127 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 126 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 137 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 133 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 131 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 134 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 129 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 128 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 130 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 128 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 131 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 130 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 133 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 126 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 131 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 134 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 127 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 122 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 122 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 129 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 139 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 139 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 119 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 120 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 159 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 128 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 136 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 127 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 129 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 127 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 127 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 124 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 121 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 127 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 124 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 127 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 145 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 132 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 128 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 131 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 124 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 128 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 163 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 128 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 148 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 135 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 143 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 128 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 130 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 128 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 120 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 119 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 120 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 115 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 140 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 137 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 125 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 125 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 130 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 116 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 134 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 118 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 123 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 115 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 129 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 124 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 127 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 120 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 119 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 121 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 121 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 113 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 123 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 112 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 124 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 119 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 125 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 121 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 137 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 129 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 132 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 120 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 120 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 124 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 112 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 113 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 117 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 110 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 127 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 111 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 106 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 105 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 121 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 118 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 115 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 114 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 110 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 110 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 99 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 127 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 115 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 106 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 107 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 109 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 114 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 122 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 112 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 118 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 110 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 124 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 110 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 111 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 114 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 107 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 115 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 109 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 114 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 112 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 122 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 112 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 106 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 112 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 109 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 109 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 120 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 109 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 122 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 115 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 114 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 105 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 122 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 114 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 140 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 135 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 119 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 113 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 116 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 127 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 110 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 118 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 111 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 115 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 114 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 111 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 112 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 116 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 102 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 125 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 115 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 114 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 117 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 124 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 111 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 115 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 115 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 116 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 125 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 112 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 111 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 113 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 118 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 116 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 114 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 120 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 116 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 115 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 118 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 116 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 114 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 117 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 142 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 122 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 141 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 137 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 112 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 96 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 89 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 85 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 89 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 96 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 116 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 89 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 84 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 84 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 88 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 86 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 73 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 91 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 81 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 82 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 84 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 77 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 87 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 98 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 70 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 73 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 74 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 92 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 64 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 59 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 85 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 75 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 83 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 68 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 82 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 78 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 68 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 71 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 81 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 63 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 83 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 63 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 77 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 70 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 66 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 60 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 68 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 61 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 73 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 78 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 65 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 61 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 70 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 65 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 77 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 68 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 77 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 61 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 76 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 74 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 81 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 94 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 97 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 82 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 84 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 98 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 84 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 108 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 94 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 83 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 88 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 88 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 95 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 81 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 101 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 88 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 87 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 87 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 84 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 83 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 84 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 86 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 85 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 84 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 106 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 106 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 71 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 91 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 95 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 69 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 70 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 89 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 75 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 82 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 78 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 74 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 97 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 84 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 79 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 83 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 76 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 81 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 82 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 91 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 78 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 81 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 93 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 94 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 88 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 84 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 90 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 91 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 78 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 70 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 87 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 84 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 81 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 77 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 84 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 89 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 82 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 88 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 80 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.