Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> See Mark Lehner "Archeology of an Image" Ph.D.
> thesis page 140 citing Edwards (1985) that the
> pyramid causeway was called a ramp or Ra-st3w for
> "entrance of the haul".


You probably saw this but just in case others didn't "Rosteau" was used a single time in the Pyramid Texts;

Utterance 300.

445a. To say: O Hrti of Nsȝ.t, ferryman of the ’Iḳh.t-boat, made by Khnum,
445b. bring this (boat) to N. N. is Seker of R-Śtȝ.w.(Rosteau)
445c. N. is on the way to the place of Seker, chief of Pdw-š.
445d. It is our brother who is bringing this (boat) for these bridge-girderers (?) of the desert.

So your contention is that "Rosteau" means "Ramp Entrance" and this was the ancient name for Giza. I suppose it doesn't matter to Egyptologists what the name of Giza was before pyramid construction but "Ramp Entrance" or "entrance to the Haul" really doesn't fit. They wouldn't want a boat at the bottom of the ramp, they'd want another stone to drag. Why would "Seker of Spread Lake" desire a stone? Why would bridge builders want a stone or a boat? If they really wanted a stone to build a bridge why would they build one in the desert?

I suppose Egyptologists simply assume this is all metaphorical and symbolic bridges in and afterlife Giza. But I must ask, what do these rituals tell you about boats, seker, bridges, or anything else? How does translating Giza's name in this way make ANYTHING AT ALL more consistent OR understandable? Are you sure Egyptology is approaching an understanding of the means to build pyramids? How could achieve this without performing simple testing to determine the physical characteristics of any pyramid at all?

How is it even possible to falsify a magical interpretation of these words? How is it possible to show the original name for Giza was if the only name we have is "Ramp Entrance" or what also has been suggested is "Place of Ramps". Certainly the ramps didn't exist when the west side of the Nile between the Fayuum and Giza was first named. What was this name? Whatever the name was it could not possibly have been "Place of Ramps".

You tell me I'm wrong but the only evidence you have is interpretation of opinion and beliefs. Meanwhile I have their ACTUAL words that make literal sense. The water to operate Steve Clayton's funiculars or any of the hydraulic proposals had to get there somehow. This is WAY above the river so almost had to flow up out of the ground exactly as the PT literally suggests. With the pyramid a bridge to immortality and the boat the part of the funicular that drives it from Spread Lake it makes perfect sense. On this basis I suggest the ancient translators were correct (the ones before Faulkner who have been excommunicated) and the word means "Mouth of Caves" from whence the water that caused so much erosion emerged just as also described in the PT.

You are the one who wants to use words to win an argument. You want to embrace modern Egyptology. I can't embrace any of their ideas because no matter your disagreement you are dismissed as an amateur, a crackpot, or a splitter. You must embrace ALL of their ideas and even this is little help in getting your hypotheses considered or (God forbid) actually tested. I do not accept anything at all. It's so ironic that some of the early 19th century Egyptologists were on the right track but then they were suddenly excommunicated when Egyptology took a different turn.

Good luck but remember Hawass scoffs at the opinions of scientists. Some believe I do too but the fact is I treasure all expert opinion especially in the hard sciences. I simply know for a fact that no expert knows nearly as much as he thinks he does because this is the human condition. When we are right we are only right within parameters defined by perspective and the limitations of woefully incomplete knowledge. All else being equal experts are far more likely to be right than anyone else and Hawass is wrong to scoff. Obviously Egyptology is wrong to keep out scientific equipment, methodology, instrumentation, and knowledge.




You alluded to "workers of Roateau" or something like it. I've never seen such a thing. I am aware that Hawass reinterpreted something to mean "stone dragger" but never heard of a "ramp worker" and am very interested in it. I'd appreciate any sort of lead you could give me since there are still a couple jobs for which I've found no workers. One of them could certainly be mistranslated as "Chief of Ramp Workers".

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1520 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 234 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 223 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 210 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 193 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 209 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 195 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 194 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 205 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 186 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 189 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 192 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 198 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 178 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 182 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 179 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 182 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 174 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 172 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 162 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 136 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 168 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 165 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 153 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 160 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 160 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 161 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 162 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 159 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 163 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 158 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 163 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 159 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 158 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 162 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 159 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 152 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 160 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 166 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 167 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 147 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 152 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 189 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 179 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 158 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 162 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 158 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 158 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 148 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 155 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 151 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 155 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 176 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 161 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 159 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 156 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 191 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 159 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 179 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 175 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 160 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 154 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 147 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 178 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 175 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 167 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 153 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 143 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 166 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 140 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 151 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 144 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 158 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 154 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 154 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 155 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 159 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 165 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 160 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 163 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 147 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 153 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 136 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 145 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 134 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 134 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 131 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 127 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 147 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 136 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 133 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 133 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 122 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 153 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 142 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 131 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 130 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 135 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 152 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 143 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 148 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 134 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 141 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 132 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 145 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 141 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 151 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 136 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 134 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 135 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 132 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 146 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 135 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 143 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 141 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 128 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 152 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 138 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 145 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 140 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 142 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 156 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 133 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 129 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 170 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 154 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 170 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 113 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 106 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 113 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 124 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 144 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 106 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 109 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 95 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 110 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 105 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 108 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 99 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 142 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 127 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 94 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 100 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 95 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 116 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 94 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 90 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 97 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 95 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 101 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 88 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 91 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 102 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 85 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 113 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 88 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 100 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 92 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 89 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 79 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 89 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 87 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 99 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 104 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 92 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 81 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 94 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 83 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 100 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 91 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 98 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 81 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 99 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 102 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 112 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 124 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 144 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 106 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 108 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 109 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 161 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 105 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 113 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 113 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 116 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 106 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 128 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 111 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 116 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 110 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 107 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 115 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 110 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 136 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 130 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 97 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 119 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 121 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 92 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 96 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 97 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 111 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 102 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 102 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 120 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 109 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 105 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 110 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 100 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 110 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 103 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 117 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 101 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 123 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 112 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 112 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 104 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 99 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 111 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 112 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 194 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 107 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 113 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 104 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.