Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Manu Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Let me ask you something: Are you more
> interested
> > in the truth or that your theory will be proven
> > right?
>
> When I started I ONLY wanted to know how the
> pyramids were built.
>
> Since I started I have gained a great deal of
> interest in the builders of the pyramids. These
> people were so remarkable and so different than
> us. We could learn a lot from them about love,
> understanding, and science. We could learn to see
> things from their highly fluid perspective.
>
> The people are more interesting than even their
> understanding and how they made it manifest.
>
> > You have made this into a cult with slogans.
> This
> > is not how you stay objective. It actually
> > prevents you from accepting new evidence.
>
> New evidence but the same old thinking. Nothing
> has changed since the 1882. We are locked into a
> single reality that isn't going to change despite
> anyone's effort because there is NEVER GOING TO BE
> ANY EVIDENCE that can't be interpreted in terms of
> our assumptions. There's really no substantial
> difference between the debate about the existence
> of ancient superstition and the existence of God.
> We each pick the evidence we consider
> determininative and brush aside all else.
>
> Slogans are irrelevant. What is relevant is that
> we all see the world in terms of our expectations.
> It makes perfect sense to people that
> superstition provides the willingness and ability
> to do anything because that's the way we see
> reality. In a sense it's even true. We can each
> and collectively achieve virtually anything we set
> our minds to. So we assume ancient people were
> just like us.
>
> > The Khufu quarry was to the south. The only
> viable
> > option was to go to the nearest wide open space
> > and that was the west side where now is the
> West
> > Field. South + West = Southwest.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. Please rephrase and
> elaborate.
>
> > This again is the cult you made for yourself.
> You
> > have created a stereotypical response to the
> > concept of ramps and dragging and that mental
> > trigger does not allow you to evaluate evidence
> > objectively. This is a huge problem Cladking.
> This
> > is the very same problem you accuse
> > "Egyptologists", your Boogeymen, of.
>
> So I say you could be right and you respond with
> this.
>
> Let me elaborate. I believe it is nearly as
> likely that aliens built the pyramid as it is that
> superstitious bumpkins dragged them up ramps.
> There is about a 2% chance that the evidence could
> have been left as it is and ramps were used. Even
> that they used magic and caused the stones to grow
> wings is no more than about 2% less likely than
> they used ramps.
>
> The evidence CLEARLY shows stones were pulled
> straight up the sides of five step pyramidfs one
> step at a time. There is an 85% probability that
> the ramps they used were at 70 degrees and the
> only other major possibility is the ramps were 52
> degrees.
>
> Egyptologists are whistling past the graveyard of
> at least one FAILED ASSUMPTION. They did not use
> an illogical and inefficient means to build these.
>
>
> > That is finally the right question to ask.
> > The answer appears to involve a combination of
> > ramps and another method and that method may
> have
> > depended on the size of the stones which tends
> to
> > decrease as you go up....see Petrie's data
> which
> > shows gradually diminishing waves of course
> > thickness
>
> "Gradually diminishing" means "regular". There was
> no significant chang at any point going up.
>
> If they used ANY ramps toward the top then "ramps
> are still the meand to build pyramids. You've not
> answered or addrssed the question but merely
> reasserted ramps.
>
> > This is why someone should attempt
> > to calculate the number of stones in each
> course
> > and their average weight based on some simple
> > assumptions and run a statistial analysis on
> rates
> > of assembly as a function of height.
>
> I have said this for years. I don't understand
> why they refuse to use any methods of modern
> science to study these structure. While
> statistics are a weak sister of science they are
> more closely related to science than "it looks
> like".
>
> > No they are not. Highly irregular and varying
> in
> > waves. Come one Cladking. Did you look at
> Petrie's
> > Plate 8?
>
> "Waves" is another term for "regular". A pendulum
> is always a pendulum no matter which way it
> swings.
>
> > Ramps cannot explain the whole story, that much
> is
> > clear. But they played a part. This is proven
> > beyond a reasonable doubt. The Khufu quarry is
> > full of ramp debris. You can see a ramp coming
> ouf
> > it. I even posted photos of it here. You never
> > took notice.
>
> It's "full of" ramp debris that has never been
> defined or measured. It is quite impossible to
> determine the slope of a ramp from the debris it
> generates or to determine if it was ever trad at
> all. Why wouldn't a funicular operate on ramps?
> How is it possible to even generate hypotheses
> about the nature of the actual ramps by "full of".
>
>
> Egyptology has never used science to address any
> of these issues. They made basic assumptions and
> NEVER SOUGHT TO FALSIFY THEM. It is THEIR
> methodology that is flawed.
>
> > They are testing as we speak. A full exterior
> > pyramid scan is one such project.
>
> One of these "projects" was completed at least
> three years ago. There are still no data
> available.


Cladking, you are trying to win an argument of words. Fine, I surrender. This isn't about words, this is about the actual evidence and how it fits into the overall model. If Egyptologists told us no ramps were used in the construction, frankly, I'd be way more concerned that you may be right about what you say about them. I stood inside of that ramp, Cladking. I touched the mortar. I walked on the Khufu quarry. I went down on my knees to pick up trash left by the tourists. That wasn't a natural ground, Cladking. It was man-made.

I really hope, one day you go to Egypt and see your theory unfold in front of the real thing.

Manu


www.cheopspyramid.com
Facebook: @ManuSeyfzadeh
[independent.academia.edu]
Under the Sphinx: [hugohousebookstore.com]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1530 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 235 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 224 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 214 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 195 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 211 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 198 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 195 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 206 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 188 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 192 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 196 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 200 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 179 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 183 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 181 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 173 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 184 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 178 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 175 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 170 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 165 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 170 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 138 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 169 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 168 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 158 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 154 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 163 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 167 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 162 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 163 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 163 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 154 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 162 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 159 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 162 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 160 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 159 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 163 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 162 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 154 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 162 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 167 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 169 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 149 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 153 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 190 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 181 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 159 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 164 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 158 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 160 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 160 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 150 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 157 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 153 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 156 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 178 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 163 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 158 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 172 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 195 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 162 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 180 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 171 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 177 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 166 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 161 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 160 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 156 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 149 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 144 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 180 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 177 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 156 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 144 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 167 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 142 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 153 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 147 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 162 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 158 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 158 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 152 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 149 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 159 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 150 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 155 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 159 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 160 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 169 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 162 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 165 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 149 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 147 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 155 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 144 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 135 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 136 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 132 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 130 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 150 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 143 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 140 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 137 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 135 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 134 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 125 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 155 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 144 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 133 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 132 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 137 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 148 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 153 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 143 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 144 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 136 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 152 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 137 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 144 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 133 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 141 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 139 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 153 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 137 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 137 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 137 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 134 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 149 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 137 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 148 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 145 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 144 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 130 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 154 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 164 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 156 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 148 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 143 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 158 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 134 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 131 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 152 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 161 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 147 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 152 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 151 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 147 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 147 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 147 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 171 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 155 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 167 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 173 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 140 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 128 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 116 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 108 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 114 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 125 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 146 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 108 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 115 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 96 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 117 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 107 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 109 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 100 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 144 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 129 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 97 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 102 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 96 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 118 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 96 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 92 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 110 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 100 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 111 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 96 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 111 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 103 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 89 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 93 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 104 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 88 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 114 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 90 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 102 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 94 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 91 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 80 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 90 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 90 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 101 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 106 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 96 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 82 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 96 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 85 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 101 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 94 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 103 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 82 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 102 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 103 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 116 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 126 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 146 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 108 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 110 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 110 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 107 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 115 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 119 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 107 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 130 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 112 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 117 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 115 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 111 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 109 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 110 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 117 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 109 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 111 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 138 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 131 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 98 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 122 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 123 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 93 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 98 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 115 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 98 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 115 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 103 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 103 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 123 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 112 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 106 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 113 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 102 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 111 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 105 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 120 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 102 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 105 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 123 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 111 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 111 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 115 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 115 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 106 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 100 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 132 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 108 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 197 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 108 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 115 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 105 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.