Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me ask you something: Are you more interested
> in the truth or that your theory will be proven
> right?

When I started I ONLY wanted to know how the pyramids were built.

Since I started I have gained a great deal of interest in the builders of the pyramids. These people were so remarkable and so different than us. We could learn a lot from them about love, understanding, and science. We could learn to see things from their highly fluid perspective.

The people are more interesting than even their understanding and how they made it manifest.

> You have made this into a cult with slogans. This
> is not how you stay objective. It actually
> prevents you from accepting new evidence.

New evidence but the same old thinking. Nothing has changed since the 1882. We are locked into a single reality that isn't going to change despite anyone's effort because there is NEVER GOING TO BE ANY EVIDENCE that can't be interpreted in terms of our assumptions. There's really no substantial difference between the debate about the existence of ancient superstition and the existence of God. We each pick the evidence we consider determininative and brush aside all else.

Slogans are irrelevant. What is relevant is that we all see the world in terms of our expectations. It makes perfect sense to people that superstition provides the willingness and ability to do anything because that's the way we see reality. In a sense it's even true. We can each and collectively achieve virtually anything we set our minds to. So we assume ancient people were just like us.

> The Khufu quarry was to the south. The only viable
> option was to go to the nearest wide open space
> and that was the west side where now is the West
> Field. South + West = Southwest.

I'm not sure what you mean. Please rephrase and elaborate.

> This again is the cult you made for yourself. You
> have created a stereotypical response to the
> concept of ramps and dragging and that mental
> trigger does not allow you to evaluate evidence
> objectively. This is a huge problem Cladking. This
> is the very same problem you accuse
> "Egyptologists", your Boogeymen, of.

So I say you could be right and you respond with this.

Let me elaborate. I believe it is nearly as likely that aliens built the pyramid as it is that superstitious bumpkins dragged them up ramps. There is about a 2% chance that the evidence could have been left as it is because ramps were used. Even that they used magic and caused the stones to grow wings is no more than about 2% less likely than they used ramps.

The evidence CLEARLY shows stones were pulled straight up the sides of five step pyramids one step at a time. There is an 85% probability that the ramps they used were at 70 degrees and the only other major possibility is the ramps were 52 degrees.

Egyptologists are whistling past the graveyard of at least one FAILED ASSUMPTION. They did not use an illogical and inefficient means to build these.

> That is finally the right question to ask.
> The answer appears to involve a combination of
> ramps and another method and that method may have
> depended on the size of the stones which tends to
> decrease as you go up....see Petrie's data which
> shows gradually diminishing waves of course
> thickness

"Gradually diminishing" means "regular". There was no significant change at any point going up.

If they used ANY ramps toward the top then "ramps are still the means to build pyramids. You've not answered or addressed the question but merely reasserted ramps.

> This is why someone should attempt
> to calculate the number of stones in each course
> and their average weight based on some simple
> assumptions and run a statistial analysis on rates
> of assembly as a function of height.

I have said this for years. I don't understand why they refuse to use any methods of modern science to study these structure. While statistics are a weak sister of science they are more closely related to science than "it looks like" or "it seems like'

> No they are not. Highly irregular and varying in
> waves. Come one Cladking. Did you look at Petrie's
> Plate 8?

"Waves" is another term for "regular". A pendulum is always a pendulum no matter which way it swings.

> Ramps cannot explain the whole story, that much is
> clear. But they played a part. This is proven
> beyond a reasonable doubt. The Khufu quarry is
> full of ramp debris. You can see a ramp coming ouf
> it. I even posted photos of it here. You never
> took notice.

It's "full of" ramp debris that has never been defined or measured. It is quite impossible to determine the slope of a ramp from the debris it generates or to determine if it was ever trod at all. Why wouldn't a funicular operate on ramps? How is it possible to even generate hypotheses about the nature of the actual ramps by "full of".

edited to add- Need I point out that if the quarry is "full" of ramps then the ramps are the size of the pyramid? How did they configure these ramps to build straight under a five step cladded pyramid? It is a logical impossibility and would require building pyramids the same volume as the pyramid at least three times. It is patently nonsense. Nobody then or now could build anything under a great pyramid sized pile of anything at all. Much less a five step perfectly true cladded pyramid. This is even considering the effort to lift the pyramid and the mountainous ramps.

Egyptology has never used science to address any of these issues. They made basic assumptions and NEVER SOUGHT TO FALSIFY THEM. It is THEIR methodology that is flawed.

> They are testing as we speak. A full exterior
> pyramid scan is one such project.

One of these "projects" was completed at least three years ago. There are still no data available.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Mar-20 20:06 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1608 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 268 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 257 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 246 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 228 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 243 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 232 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 229 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 243 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 221 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 225 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 228 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 234 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 219 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 213 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 214 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 209 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 216 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 213 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 207 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 199 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 195 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 202 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 170 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 204 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 200 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 190 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 183 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 197 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 200 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 193 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 199 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 195 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 185 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 195 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 195 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 187 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 192 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 199 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 199 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 210 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 193 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 194 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 195 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 194 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 184 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 197 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 203 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 201 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 180 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 189 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 224 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 213 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 190 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 193 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 190 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 193 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 190 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 195 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 185 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 179 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 189 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 185 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 191 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 213 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 199 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 187 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 192 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 183 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 190 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 203 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 227 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 194 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 213 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 207 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 209 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 200 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 193 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 193 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 201 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 187 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 181 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 182 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 175 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 211 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 212 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 199 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 188 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 185 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 191 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 173 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 206 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 173 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 189 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 181 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 194 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 190 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 191 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 184 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 182 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 192 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 181 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 182 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 189 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 172 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 194 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 187 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 196 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 185 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 208 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 197 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 198 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 185 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 181 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 187 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 179 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 165 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 178 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 160 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 183 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 161 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 159 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 179 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 177 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 170 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 165 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 161 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 161 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 152 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 180 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 174 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 162 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 156 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 167 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 178 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 180 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 172 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 172 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 161 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 178 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 164 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 192 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 163 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 175 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 170 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 167 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 185 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 167 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 163 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 159 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 159 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 176 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 165 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 177 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 175 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 170 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 156 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 184 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 173 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 174 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 181 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 171 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 192 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 194 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 185 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 181 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 177 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 170 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 184 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 173 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 178 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 162 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 180 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 168 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 166 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 160 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 181 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 189 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 169 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 164 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 180 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 172 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 183 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 177 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 179 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 178 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 183 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 165 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 163 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 186 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 170 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 175 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 171 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 178 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 167 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 174 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 200 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 187 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 199 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 207 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 167 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 143 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 143 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 134 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 137 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 152 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 175 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 143 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 134 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 140 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 140 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 143 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 125 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 151 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 138 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 135 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 137 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 128 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 175 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 141 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 158 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 127 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 130 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 125 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 146 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 125 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 119 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 137 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 126 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 137 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 122 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 143 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 128 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 118 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 115 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 130 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 112 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 140 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 119 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 131 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 120 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 118 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 105 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 116 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 117 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 129 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 131 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 127 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 106 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 126 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 107 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 131 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 124 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 131 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 106 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 128 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 130 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 150 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 157 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 179 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 136 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 136 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 140 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 200 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 140 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 141 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 158 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 158 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 154 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 145 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 136 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 157 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 139 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 141 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 147 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 137 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 138 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 142 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 141 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 142 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 137 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 170 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 160 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 123 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 147 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 151 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 118 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 128 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 147 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 123 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 144 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 128 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 134 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 158 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 142 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 138 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 137 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 126 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 140 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 134 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 150 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 130 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 131 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 141 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 152 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 151 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 141 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 143 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 162 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 141 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 145 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 133 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 127 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 158 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 152 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 134 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 133 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 270 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 142 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 134 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 141 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 134 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.