Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me ask you something: Are you more interested
> in the truth or that your theory will be proven
> right?

When I started I ONLY wanted to know how the pyramids were built.

Since I started I have gained a great deal of interest in the builders of the pyramids. These people were so remarkable and so different than us. We could learn a lot from them about love, understanding, and science. We could learn to see things from their highly fluid perspective.

The people are more interesting than even their understanding and how they made it manifest.

> You have made this into a cult with slogans. This
> is not how you stay objective. It actually
> prevents you from accepting new evidence.

New evidence but the same old thinking. Nothing has changed since the 1882. We are locked into a single reality that isn't going to change despite anyone's effort because there is NEVER GOING TO BE ANY EVIDENCE that can't be interpreted in terms of our assumptions. There's really no substantial difference between the debate about the existence of ancient superstition and the existence of God. We each pick the evidence we consider determininative and brush aside all else.

Slogans are irrelevant. What is relevant is that we all see the world in terms of our expectations. It makes perfect sense to people that superstition provides the willingness and ability to do anything because that's the way we see reality. In a sense it's even true. We can each and collectively achieve virtually anything we set our minds to. So we assume ancient people were just like us.

> The Khufu quarry was to the south. The only viable
> option was to go to the nearest wide open space
> and that was the west side where now is the West
> Field. South + West = Southwest.

I'm not sure what you mean. Please rephrase and elaborate.

> This again is the cult you made for yourself. You
> have created a stereotypical response to the
> concept of ramps and dragging and that mental
> trigger does not allow you to evaluate evidence
> objectively. This is a huge problem Cladking. This
> is the very same problem you accuse
> "Egyptologists", your Boogeymen, of.

So I say you could be right and you respond with this.

Let me elaborate. I believe it is nearly as likely that aliens built the pyramid as it is that superstitious bumpkins dragged them up ramps. There is about a 2% chance that the evidence could have been left as it is because ramps were used. Even that they used magic and caused the stones to grow wings is no more than about 2% less likely than they used ramps.

The evidence CLEARLY shows stones were pulled straight up the sides of five step pyramids one step at a time. There is an 85% probability that the ramps they used were at 70 degrees and the only other major possibility is the ramps were 52 degrees.

Egyptologists are whistling past the graveyard of at least one FAILED ASSUMPTION. They did not use an illogical and inefficient means to build these.

> That is finally the right question to ask.
> The answer appears to involve a combination of
> ramps and another method and that method may have
> depended on the size of the stones which tends to
> decrease as you go up....see Petrie's data which
> shows gradually diminishing waves of course
> thickness

"Gradually diminishing" means "regular". There was no significant change at any point going up.

If they used ANY ramps toward the top then "ramps are still the means to build pyramids. You've not answered or addressed the question but merely reasserted ramps.

> This is why someone should attempt
> to calculate the number of stones in each course
> and their average weight based on some simple
> assumptions and run a statistial analysis on rates
> of assembly as a function of height.

I have said this for years. I don't understand why they refuse to use any methods of modern science to study these structure. While statistics are a weak sister of science they are more closely related to science than "it looks like" or "it seems like'

> No they are not. Highly irregular and varying in
> waves. Come one Cladking. Did you look at Petrie's
> Plate 8?

"Waves" is another term for "regular". A pendulum is always a pendulum no matter which way it swings.

> Ramps cannot explain the whole story, that much is
> clear. But they played a part. This is proven
> beyond a reasonable doubt. The Khufu quarry is
> full of ramp debris. You can see a ramp coming ouf
> it. I even posted photos of it here. You never
> took notice.

It's "full of" ramp debris that has never been defined or measured. It is quite impossible to determine the slope of a ramp from the debris it generates or to determine if it was ever trod at all. Why wouldn't a funicular operate on ramps? How is it possible to even generate hypotheses about the nature of the actual ramps by "full of".

edited to add- Need I point out that if the quarry is "full" of ramps then the ramps are the size of the pyramid? How did they configure these ramps to build straight under a five step cladded pyramid? It is a logical impossibility and would require building pyramids the same volume as the pyramid at least three times. It is patently nonsense. Nobody then or now could build anything under a great pyramid sized pile of anything at all. Much less a five step perfectly true cladded pyramid. This is even considering the effort to lift the pyramid and the mountainous ramps.

Egyptology has never used science to address any of these issues. They made basic assumptions and NEVER SOUGHT TO FALSIFY THEM. It is THEIR methodology that is flawed.

> They are testing as we speak. A full exterior
> pyramid scan is one such project.

One of these "projects" was completed at least three years ago. There are still no data available.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Mar-20 20:06 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1440 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 217 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 206 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 196 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 178 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 195 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 177 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 176 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 184 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 169 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 171 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 179 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 180 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 163 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 165 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 162 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 163 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 158 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 157 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 150 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 147 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 121 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 150 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 146 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 138 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 139 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 143 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 145 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 145 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 145 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 141 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 144 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 143 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 143 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 145 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 144 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 144 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 134 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 134 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 140 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 150 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 150 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 130 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 136 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 171 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 163 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 140 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 145 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 139 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 142 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 137 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 132 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 139 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 136 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 138 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 158 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 146 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 141 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 136 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 139 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 175 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 144 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 160 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 156 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 141 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 143 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 135 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 131 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 131 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 129 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 162 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 154 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 147 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 137 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 136 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 143 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 127 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 150 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 127 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 135 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 127 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 140 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 140 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 141 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 134 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 130 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 128 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 137 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 123 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 139 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 130 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 137 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 131 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 150 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 141 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 145 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 132 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 131 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 138 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 125 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 121 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 128 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 117 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 136 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 119 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 116 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 114 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 132 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 126 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 122 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 122 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 119 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 118 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 110 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 136 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 126 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 115 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 116 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 118 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 126 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 135 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 122 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 130 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 119 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 135 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 121 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 124 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 123 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 116 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 126 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 120 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 124 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 124 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 136 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 120 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 116 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 119 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 118 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 117 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 133 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 120 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 131 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 125 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 126 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 114 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 133 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 126 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 131 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 139 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 127 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 122 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 127 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 141 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 119 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 131 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 121 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 123 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 120 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 125 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 112 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 124 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 132 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 124 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 133 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 120 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 130 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 122 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 121 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 120 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 123 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 125 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 123 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 131 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 127 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 124 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 126 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 154 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 131 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 150 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 148 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 108 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 98 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 95 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 99 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 108 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 125 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 100 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 92 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 94 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 96 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 95 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 80 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 99 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 92 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 91 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 93 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 85 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 125 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 97 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 80 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 84 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 83 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 103 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 75 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 73 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 93 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 84 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 94 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 80 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 92 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 87 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 76 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 79 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 89 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 71 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 94 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 74 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 86 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 77 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 74 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 67 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 76 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 73 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 82 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 88 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 76 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 69 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 78 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 73 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 85 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 76 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 86 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 69 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 87 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 85 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 92 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 107 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 120 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 94 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 95 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 93 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 98 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 113 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 102 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 99 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 104 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 91 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 112 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 95 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 97 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 97 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 94 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 90 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 92 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 97 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 94 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 96 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 120 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 116 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 80 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 102 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 105 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 79 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 82 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 99 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 83 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 98 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 87 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 84 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 107 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 94 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 89 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 93 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 85 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 90 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 89 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 102 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 87 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 89 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 97 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 95 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 98 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 99 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 88 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 82 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 99 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 96 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 99 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 86 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 95 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 102 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 92 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 97 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 88 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.