Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me ask you something: Are you more interested
> in the truth or that your theory will be proven
> right?

When I started I ONLY wanted to know how the pyramids were built.

Since I started I have gained a great deal of interest in the builders of the pyramids. These people were so remarkable and so different than us. We could learn a lot from them about love, understanding, and science. We could learn to see things from their highly fluid perspective.

The people are more interesting than even their understanding and how they made it manifest.

> You have made this into a cult with slogans. This
> is not how you stay objective. It actually
> prevents you from accepting new evidence.

New evidence but the same old thinking. Nothing has changed since the 1882. We are locked into a single reality that isn't going to change despite anyone's effort because there is NEVER GOING TO BE ANY EVIDENCE that can't be interpreted in terms of our assumptions. There's really no substantial difference between the debate about the existence of ancient superstition and the existence of God. We each pick the evidence we consider determininative and brush aside all else.

Slogans are irrelevant. What is relevant is that we all see the world in terms of our expectations. It makes perfect sense to people that superstition provides the willingness and ability to do anything because that's the way we see reality. In a sense it's even true. We can each and collectively achieve virtually anything we set our minds to. So we assume ancient people were just like us.

> The Khufu quarry was to the south. The only viable
> option was to go to the nearest wide open space
> and that was the west side where now is the West
> Field. South + West = Southwest.

I'm not sure what you mean. Please rephrase and elaborate.

> This again is the cult you made for yourself. You
> have created a stereotypical response to the
> concept of ramps and dragging and that mental
> trigger does not allow you to evaluate evidence
> objectively. This is a huge problem Cladking. This
> is the very same problem you accuse
> "Egyptologists", your Boogeymen, of.

So I say you could be right and you respond with this.

Let me elaborate. I believe it is nearly as likely that aliens built the pyramid as it is that superstitious bumpkins dragged them up ramps. There is about a 2% chance that the evidence could have been left as it is because ramps were used. Even that they used magic and caused the stones to grow wings is no more than about 2% less likely than they used ramps.

The evidence CLEARLY shows stones were pulled straight up the sides of five step pyramids one step at a time. There is an 85% probability that the ramps they used were at 70 degrees and the only other major possibility is the ramps were 52 degrees.

Egyptologists are whistling past the graveyard of at least one FAILED ASSUMPTION. They did not use an illogical and inefficient means to build these.

> That is finally the right question to ask.
> The answer appears to involve a combination of
> ramps and another method and that method may have
> depended on the size of the stones which tends to
> decrease as you go up....see Petrie's data which
> shows gradually diminishing waves of course
> thickness

"Gradually diminishing" means "regular". There was no significant change at any point going up.

If they used ANY ramps toward the top then "ramps are still the means to build pyramids. You've not answered or addressed the question but merely reasserted ramps.

> This is why someone should attempt
> to calculate the number of stones in each course
> and their average weight based on some simple
> assumptions and run a statistial analysis on rates
> of assembly as a function of height.

I have said this for years. I don't understand why they refuse to use any methods of modern science to study these structure. While statistics are a weak sister of science they are more closely related to science than "it looks like" or "it seems like'

> No they are not. Highly irregular and varying in
> waves. Come one Cladking. Did you look at Petrie's
> Plate 8?

"Waves" is another term for "regular". A pendulum is always a pendulum no matter which way it swings.

> Ramps cannot explain the whole story, that much is
> clear. But they played a part. This is proven
> beyond a reasonable doubt. The Khufu quarry is
> full of ramp debris. You can see a ramp coming ouf
> it. I even posted photos of it here. You never
> took notice.

It's "full of" ramp debris that has never been defined or measured. It is quite impossible to determine the slope of a ramp from the debris it generates or to determine if it was ever trod at all. Why wouldn't a funicular operate on ramps? How is it possible to even generate hypotheses about the nature of the actual ramps by "full of".

edited to add- Need I point out that if the quarry is "full" of ramps then the ramps are the size of the pyramid? How did they configure these ramps to build straight under a five step cladded pyramid? It is a logical impossibility and would require building pyramids the same volume as the pyramid at least three times. It is patently nonsense. Nobody then or now could build anything under a great pyramid sized pile of anything at all. Much less a five step perfectly true cladded pyramid. This is even considering the effort to lift the pyramid and the mountainous ramps.

Egyptology has never used science to address any of these issues. They made basic assumptions and NEVER SOUGHT TO FALSIFY THEM. It is THEIR methodology that is flawed.

> They are testing as we speak. A full exterior
> pyramid scan is one such project.

One of these "projects" was completed at least three years ago. There are still no data available.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Mar-20 20:06 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1520 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 234 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 222 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 210 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 193 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 209 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 194 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 194 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 205 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 185 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 189 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 192 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 198 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 178 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 182 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 179 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 181 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 174 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 172 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 162 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 167 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 136 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 167 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 164 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 155 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 160 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 164 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 160 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 161 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 161 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 152 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 159 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 162 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 158 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 159 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 162 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 159 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 157 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 161 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 158 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 154 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 151 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 160 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 166 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 166 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 147 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 152 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 189 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 178 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 161 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 157 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 158 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 147 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 151 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 176 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 161 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 159 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 153 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 155 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 169 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 191 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 159 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 178 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 168 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 175 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 165 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 159 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 156 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 164 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 153 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 142 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 177 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 175 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 166 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 153 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 157 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 142 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 166 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 140 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 151 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 144 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 158 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 154 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 157 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 156 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 148 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 146 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 153 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 138 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 155 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 150 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 158 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 149 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 165 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 160 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 162 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 147 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 146 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 152 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 135 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 145 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 134 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 151 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 130 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 127 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 147 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 142 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 138 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 136 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 132 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 132 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 122 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 152 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 142 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 130 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 129 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 135 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 145 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 151 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 141 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 143 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 133 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 148 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 134 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 140 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 131 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 144 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 139 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 151 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 135 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 133 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 135 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 131 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 132 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 146 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 135 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 146 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 143 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 141 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 128 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 152 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 140 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 137 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 162 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 162 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 154 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 144 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 139 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 142 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 155 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 132 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 134 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 139 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 128 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 159 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 140 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 145 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 138 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 150 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 148 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 136 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 135 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 146 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 141 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 143 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 144 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 137 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 142 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 169 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 153 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 166 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 170 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 138 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 113 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 106 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 112 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 123 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 144 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 106 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 109 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 111 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 113 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 94 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 114 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 109 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 105 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 107 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 98 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 142 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 112 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 127 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 94 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 100 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 95 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 116 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 93 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 90 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 108 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 97 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 108 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 94 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 109 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 101 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 88 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 90 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 102 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 84 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 112 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 87 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 100 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 91 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 88 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 78 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 89 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 87 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 99 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 103 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 92 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 80 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 93 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 83 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 100 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 91 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 98 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 80 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 99 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 102 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 111 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 124 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 144 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 106 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 108 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 108 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 160 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 105 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 113 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 113 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 116 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 106 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 127 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 110 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 115 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 110 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 106 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 114 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 108 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 109 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 136 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 130 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 96 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 118 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 120 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 91 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 96 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 113 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 97 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 111 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 101 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 101 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 120 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 109 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 105 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 109 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 99 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 110 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 103 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 117 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 101 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 113 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 121 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 122 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 110 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 130 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 112 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 112 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 103 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 98 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 128 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 111 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 118 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 112 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 194 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 119 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 107 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 112 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 104 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.