Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> What ever your idea, Steve's idea or even tom dick
> and harry's idea is, you do not hav to DISPROOVE
> Ramps as a prerequisite to PROOVING an
> alternative.

Of course I didn't need to disprove ramps but I did it anyway.

> Shut up about ramps and try to put your ideas into
> something that can be analysed..

Steve Clayton is doing a pretty good job of it right here.

The problem is that Charles Rigano was simply dismissed by Egyptology when he solved it in 2006 and they still won't respond as the evidence and proof mounts. They are so rooted in the 19th century they still can't see the evidence.

This issue is solved and believers just keep- telling everyone to "shut up" and get back in line on the ramps.

There are countless tests that can be run to determine how the pyramids were built no matter what the method. I've called for infrared testing for over a decade. This century old technology simply hasn't been used. There are plenty of other tests that could be done but Egyptology fixates on the occult.