Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
mastaba G 4000(Junker data)
bottom length = 53.20 m
bottom width = 26.775 m
top length = 50.165 m?
top width = 23.74 m

vertical mean length = 51.6825 m = 98.71 c
vertical mean width = 25.2575 m = 48.24 c
vertical mean half diagonal = 28.762 m = 54.94 c

bottom half diagonal = 29.7789 m = 56.88 c
top half diagonal = 27.7494 m = 53.002 c

mean Uranus radius = 25,362,000 ± 7,000 m

Uranus semi-major axis = 2,872,460,000,000 m
Uranus aphelion = 3,003,620,000,000 m
Uranus perihelion = 2,741,300,000,000 m

The Mastaba celestial orbit eccentricity is computed to be 0.03528 while the present Uranus orbit eccentricity is 0.0457.

The relationship between the Khufu Pyramid and the Hemiunu mastaba can be easily noted:

mastaba vertical mean half diagonal x 8 = Khufu pyramid width = 55 cubits x 8 = 440 cubits

Greek for one(en):

EN = 5 + 50 = 55

EIMI H ZΩH = IHΣOYΣ

[the-phaistos-disk.webnode.com]



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 01-Mar-20 15:06 by Spiros.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 600 DUNE 29-Feb-20 13:09
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 111 Manu 29-Feb-20 15:52
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 98 Thanos5150 29-Feb-20 16:04
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 93 DUNE 29-Feb-20 17:20
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 84 Manu 29-Feb-20 18:06
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 85 DUNE 29-Feb-20 18:48
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 86 Manu 29-Feb-20 19:39
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 91 thinkitover 29-Feb-20 21:56
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 103 Manu 01-Mar-20 07:57
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 79 Spiros 29-Feb-20 19:46
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 90 Thanos5150 01-Mar-20 04:00
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 85 Spiros 01-Mar-20 15:03
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 76 Manu 01-Mar-20 16:05
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 81 Spiros 01-Mar-20 17:13
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 88 Manu 01-Mar-20 17:34
Not Cricket 93 Dr. Troglodyte 29-Feb-20 21:38
Re: Not Cricket 105 DUNE 01-Mar-20 14:05
Re: Not Cricket 83 Manu 01-Mar-20 16:39
Re: Not Cricket 79 thinkitover 01-Mar-20 22:54
Re: Not Cricket 80 Manu 02-Mar-20 00:42
Re: Not Cricket 88 thinkitover 01-Mar-20 21:45
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 87 molder 01-Mar-20 23:22
Roman Foot = 4/5 Remen 78 thinkitover 02-Mar-20 00:06
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 86 DUNE 02-Mar-20 11:09
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 83 molder 02-Mar-20 12:34
Re: The Sun at G4000 80 DUNE 02-Mar-20 16:02
Re: The Sun at G4000 78 Manu 02-Mar-20 17:55
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 79 thinkitover 02-Mar-20 18:36
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 89 magisterchessmutt 03-Mar-20 22:32
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 90 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:52
Is It Time to Christen Thee Manu-Re Yet? 86 thinkitover 02-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Is It Time to Christen Thee Manu-Re Yet? 89 Manu 02-Mar-20 20:22
Re: Is It Time to Christen Thee Manu-Re Yet? 84 Sirfiroth 02-Mar-20 22:58
West Field-5TH Dynasty intrusion. 97 Manu 03-Mar-20 00:16
Re: Is It Time to Christen Thee Manu-Re Yet? 96 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 06:04
Re: Is It Time to Christen Thee Manu-Re Yet? 84 Manu 03-Mar-20 08:59
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 79 molder 03-Mar-20 11:25
Re:Further to G4000 , an imperial connection to G1 79 DUNE 03-Mar-20 12:48
Re: Re:Further to G4000 , an imperial connection to G1 84 thinkitover 04-Mar-20 00:23
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 93 Manu 03-Mar-20 12:59
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 80 molder 03-Mar-20 22:14
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 85 Manu 03-Mar-20 23:07
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 90 molder 04-Mar-20 06:01
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 93 Manu 04-Mar-20 10:19
Re: It is the Roman foot 11.664ins 79 molder 04-Mar-20 23:27
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 138 DUNE 05-Mar-20 15:36
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 81 DUNE 08-Mar-20 13:46
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 80 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:50
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 74 molder 08-Mar-20 23:40
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 75 DUNE 09-Mar-20 08:57
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 70 molder 09-Mar-20 12:23
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 86 DUNE 09-Mar-20 13:00
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 4 An answer 83 molder 09-Mar-20 22:18
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 4 An answer 77 thinkitover 10-Mar-20 07:41
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 4 An answer 86 DUNE 10-Mar-20 10:01
Re: The number 4356 83 DUNE 10-Mar-20 17:09
Re: The number 4356 65 molder 10-Mar-20 22:27
Petrie's Giza Orientation 100 thinkitover 11-Mar-20 09:06
Re: Petrie's Giza Orientation 79 thinkitover 11-Mar-20 11:30
Re: Giza Rectangle 2.5 x 3.2 = 8 74 molder 12-Mar-20 11:31
Re: Giza Rectangle 2.5 x 3.2 = 8 83 DUNE 12-Mar-20 12:05
Re: Giza Rectangle 2.5 x 3.2 = 8 71 molder 12-Mar-20 21:15
A Speculative History of Mycerinus Pyramid Measurement 119 thinkitover 13-Mar-20 06:08
Re: Giza Rectangle 2.5 x 3.2 = 8 69 thinkitover 13-Mar-20 05:06
Re: Giza and the Imperial Imperative 75 thinkitover 10-Mar-20 08:08
Re: Not Cricket 98 Manu 02-Mar-20 01:53
Some Initial Observations on Giza Mastaba G4660 92 thinkitover 02-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Some Initial Observations on Giza Mastaba G4660 79 DUNE 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Some Initial Observations on Giza Mastaba G4660 79 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 01:36
Re: A measured analysis of Hemiunu Mastaba G 4000 79 DUNE 10-Mar-20 22:50


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.