I probably should get off this hobby horse soon?
Up to you.
How long can one continue to ride (in IMHO) a dead horse?
This whole rabbit hole has been dug because of one simple reason. As one poster put it, "a lack of a basic knowledge of geology," or some such term.
Your premise is that the Wall Stones are reconstituted limestone from the quarry and through some lost technology the organic particles were removed; crystalline material was added and a binder of sorts was used to make the finished product.
This scenario is based on your assumption that all limestone is a sedimentary rock produced under pressure - mostly by the weight of seawater or whatever - hence the marine component.
The quarry limestone exhibits these qualities.
However, the Wall limestone has no marine material and contains a crystalline component.
Because it is a different limestone.
The Wall limestone has been created through precipitation in freshwater. Not sedimentation.
That is why I directed you to the Water Temple.
If you understood the process of precipitation, you would understand why the pre Inca called them Living Stones and my reference to children and having a drink.
The reason that the blocks are in random configuration is also tied to this natural process. As is the density, hence weight of the limestone and the hardness, or softness, of the stone at certain stages of its life.
But that reason would only cause far more blowback from diehard Davidovits fans and mainstream sceptics.
I will leave you with my initial image from the Water Temple. Pay close attention to it. In particular the top right of the central mass and the oblong block still in the mass at lower left of center.
And then ask yourself, "Why would anyone go the trouble of shaping all these small stones around the central mass, when it would have been far easier to remove the front of the central mass and use larger uniform blocks for the entire wall?"