Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Open mind Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Barbelo wrote: "recrystallization under intense
> heat" as part of the inscription process. But
> intense heat turns limestone into quicklime as
> evidenced in "TLSOS". Crystallization only
> occurred once. When?"

>
> It appears when ever they wanted. Its true
> crystallization only occurs under intense heat,
> with the present known material science
> limitations. The bonds of material can be broken
> and reformed as often as you want when you
> understand the underlying science, which I don't.
> Heat is just the first way you discover that those
> bonds can be broken and reformed. And you learn
> that the cooling rate determines the crystal size.
> The slower the cooling rate, the larger the
> crystals. But you could argue for the existence
> of a hypothetical cold bond breaking 'tech' by
> observing the crystal size in that inscription.
>
> In TLSOS, they depict that inscription as using
> the rock as a quick note pad to communicate
> something. The haphazard rough script clarity
> supports that conclusion reasonably well. But
> considering the clearly visible crystal size, if
> heat was a critical part of this 'tech' then they
> would have to have encased this stone in a device
> that slowly decreased the heat of the rock having
> been heated by the tool, over a long period of
> time to allow for that size of crystal. But as it
> seems to have been a quick scribble, I would
> conclude that its unlikely they had that problem.

OM & Barbelo (but all)

TLSOS is an interesting vid mainly for the things discussed but I suggest the conclusions drawn are merely unique but worthy speculation and opinion. I included the original (shorter version) for interest in the actual artefacts and certainly not any direct support for artificial stone. It is rather somewhat ridiculed .

I think you will find that Barbelo's point was that the conjecture offered is nonsensical! ????

Once upon a time long ago, most of us as kids played with plasticine?
The type of marks and inscription look indeed like a nail (or some such) has drawn on plasticine?.

It was not heated. It was a geopolymer concoction which solidified at ambient temperature. (imho)

What you are describing as large crystallisation. (I think?) is the appearance of dolomite (the banding)?.
The actual chemical components of such geopolymer concoction can be found on Davidovits web site
Video 4 - Deals with Egyptian pyramids (a very nerdy perhaps boring chemical vid) essentially a magnesium silicate component.

It is a pity this artefact is hidden and they say likely to be buried , because under electron microscope and Xray analysis, the chemical composition of a small sample, most likely , would prove man made geopolymer.


In regard to the pool of limestone splashed on the ground. That looks like one of Thanos's "wheel barrow whoopsies"!?
It seems to have been viscous ie a pool.

The vid at around 31 min mark our Russian friend mentions it all (other strange unexplained artefacts and large blocks with scoops ) and looks like softened stone but then tries to dismiss it as being the result of hammering. Clearly he has closed his mind to that possibility . I think a pity but hey geopolymer is also just opinion.
However given the amazing world leading development of technology that has led to heat resistant uses in high tech fighter aircraft, F1 cars, Superior floor slabs for high rise building , airport runways etc (many more) then if you watch and read enough of Davidovits, it is difficult to suggest he is just guessing! He has serious professional proven expertise.

End of rant
Cheers

edit in italic



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07-Jan-20 21:32 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 1602 Corpuscles 21-Dec-19 17:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 225 Open mind 22-Dec-19 02:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 191 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 05:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 164 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 122 thinkitover 23-Dec-19 10:05
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 203 ocka 22-Dec-19 09:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 158 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 18:01
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 155 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiahuanaco architect named 119 molder 23-Dec-19 22:16
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 119 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:44
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 120 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:47
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 100 Hanslune 25-Dec-19 01:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 156 Thanos5150 25-Dec-19 02:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 Hanslune 27-Dec-19 23:09
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 109 Thanos5150 28-Dec-19 17:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 118 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 06:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Merrell 29-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 101 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 20:31
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Merrell 29-Dec-19 23:54
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:03
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 88 Merrell 01-Jan-20 10:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 82 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 97 Open mind 31-Dec-19 19:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 81 Merrell 31-Dec-19 23:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 82 Open mind 01-Jan-20 03:02
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 126 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 04:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 05:51
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 108 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 06:59
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 101 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 19:40
Basalt Pavers 93 Barbelo 01-Jan-20 21:33
Re: Basalt Pavers 92 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 23:01
Re: Basalt Pavers 86 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 03:36
Re: Basalt Pavers 99 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:42
Re: Basalt Pavers 85 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 06:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 02:17
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:03
Basalt Pillar 107 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 07:15
Re: Basalt Pillar 89 Open mind 02-Jan-20 15:43
Re: Basalt Pillar 104 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 19:06
Re: Basalt Pillar 93 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 121 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 18:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 115 Merrell 02-Jan-20 18:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 153 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 11:15
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 20:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Merrell 03-Jan-20 21:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 23:23
Sacsayhuaman 102 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 02:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 102 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 03:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 98 Thanos5150 04-Jan-20 03:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 92 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 05:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 139 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 11:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 91 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 92 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 20:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 82 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:55
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 21:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 86 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 23:40
Re: Sacsayhuaman 86 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:59
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Open mind 06-Jan-20 01:08
Re: Sacsayhuaman 78 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 02:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 88 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 03:50
Re: Sacsayhuaman 87 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 04:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 94 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 05:10
Re: Sacsayhuaman 100 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:47
Re: Sacsayhuaman 106 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 16:53
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 19:06
The Limestone Puddle 81 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:27
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 21:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 22:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 98 Thanos5150 07-Jan-20 17:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:48
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Open mind 06-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 85 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 21:30
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 07-Jan-20 20:43
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 06-Jan-20 13:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 83 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 11:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 10:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 seasmith 06-Jan-20 14:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 20:46
Re: Sacsayhuaman 76 Open mind 06-Jan-20 16:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Open mind 07-Jan-20 15:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 91 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:25
Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 78 Barbelo 07-Jan-20 23:51
Re: Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 89 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 01:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 79 Open mind 08-Jan-20 00:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 00:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 01:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 08-Jan-20 02:06
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 03:20
Re: Sacsayhuaman 98 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 07:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 74 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 12:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 76 Open mind 08-Jan-20 16:42
Re: Sacsayhuaman 78 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 18:24
Re: Sacsayhuaman 68 Open mind 08-Jan-20 20:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 21:44
LImestone vs Limestone 72 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 22:40
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 89 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 23:47
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 78 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 01:57
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 84 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 03:09
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 86 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 04:07
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 76 Open mind 09-Jan-20 16:06
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 74 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 20:49
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 73 Open mind 09-Jan-20 20:58
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 90 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 21:20
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 73 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:12
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 83 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 17:15
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 77 Open mind 09-Jan-20 15:25
Re:Sacsayhuaman 68 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 07:00
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 69 Open mind 10-Jan-20 13:15
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 95 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 14:34
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 67 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:47
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 77 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 73 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 69 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:00
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 93 Thanos5150 09-Jan-20 01:44
Tombomachay 88 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 06:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 80 Barbelo 10-Jan-20 07:30
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 145 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 11:41
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 92 Barbelo 11-Jan-20 05:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 85 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 01:24
Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 90 Barbelo 12-Jan-20 12:11
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 99 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 20:56
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 100 Open mind 13-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Sacsayhuaman 69 Open mind 08-Jan-20 23:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 79 Open mind 08-Jan-20 14:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 70 Merrell 08-Jan-20 17:57
On the fence... 81 Racho 08-Jan-20 04:51
Re: On the fence... 75 Open mind 08-Jan-20 15:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Merrell 04-Jan-20 09:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 09:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 95 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 84 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 00:34
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 71 Open mind 05-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 86 Open mind 02-Jan-20 03:37
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Merrell 01-Jan-20 14:10
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 84 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 125 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 111 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:30
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Open mind 22-Dec-19 22:12
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 112 WVK 23-Dec-19 15:21
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Open mind 23-Dec-19 23:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 116 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 22:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 113 seasmith 23-Dec-19 03:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 107 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 07:20
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 09:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 122 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 111 Hanslune 24-Dec-19 22:35
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 172 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 19:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 174 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 165 Enigcom 02-Jan-20 17:29


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.