No one is going to crucify you for
> offering explicit detailed (valued) opinion (even
> if only conjecture or just plain BS!)
> Don't do plain BS.
I apologise. I think many think the whole thread is "plain BS!" !!! ???
> The presenter stated how the Inca described the
> It's your video. Watch it again from the timeline
> which you presented.
I did at your prompting manage to watch it again. It seems I missed the main thrust of that vid. I was looking for examples rather than their message . Living stones!
ELO luv'd em as a kid. Geoff Lynn 'a Wilbury' too!
> And while you're at it, any idea why more refined
> stones (angular) were found in the fill behind the
> wall (natural)?
I do understand you first screen capture image better and can only guess at the second ?
I think there has been periods of renovation at broken sections?
What reason can you propose? Seriously interested!
unrelated but more so I found it interesting that those peculiar mounds of carved stone ("Hwoccas" sp?) are ALL accompanied by caves.
Limestone when it is mined (or tailings from mining) comes out often very damp and VERY soft. I am wondering whether such were originally the refuse from mining? AND SOFT? The presenters say the Ica said the things talked to them and guided them to gold silver (probably copper too)
If they manufacture blocks or render with Natron then perhaps it was dumped alongside mounds of waste kaolinic limestone. Then rain and disturbance and later drying caused those odd shaped things , but at sometime easily carved, strange blobs?
Anyway, thank you for your interest. I understand you have a bit of a 'mystical bent' and therefore more capable than I to get (pick up on) the underlying intent of those Russian presenters.
You guess and comments welcome.