Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In regards to your repeated question:
> I wonder whether Flinders Petrie would satisfy
> you? I am sure you have read this before , but
> likely from his book direct? (rather than this
> source requoting it)
>
Quote
F Petrie
In addition to achieving seamless joins between blocks, the highly polished limestone casing
stones that covered the pyramid were fixed with a 'fine aluminosilicate cement'. The finished pyramid contained approximately 115,000 of these stones, (Over 13 acres), each weighing ten tons or more. These stones were dressed on all six of their sides, not just the side exposed to the visible surface, to tolerances of .01 inch. They were set together so closely that a thin razor blade could not be inserted between the stones.

You are attributing this quote to Petrie but this is the article paraphrasing. What Petrie said, also in the article, is:
Quote

.'the mean variation of the cutting of the stone from a straight line and from a true square is but 0.1 inch in a length of 75 inches up the face, an amount of accuracy equal to the most modern opticians' straight edges of such a length. These joints, with an area of some 35 square feet each, were not only worked as finely as this, but were cemented throughout. Though the stones were brought as close as 1/500 of an inch, or, in fact, into contact, and the mean opening of the join was 1/50 of an inch, yet the builders managed to fill the joint with cement, despite the great area of it, and the weight of the stone to be moved- some 16 tons. To merely place such stones in exact contact at the sides would be careful work, but to do so with cement in the joints seems almost impossible'. (7)

"...fine aluminosilicate cement" is a term likely taken from Davidovits.

Regardless, this "cement" Petrie and Vyse are referring to is the mortar/plaster. Talked about before, this mortar is found slopped and slathered all over G1 and a plaster is found in the interior. It was also used to "cement" the paving stones on the plateau so it would not be surprising to find it used for the floor blocks of G1's mortuary temple which should not be confused with modern restoration.

Though the DE had used mortar since the beginnings of Dynastic Egypt (before?), its first use in pyramid construction is found at Meidum and more notably the Bent Pyramid where the latter they used large amounts of raw mortar and clay to "cement" the blocks together and provide a level surface. At some point in construction the mortar became much more refined as they started to kiln dry it making it much harder and compact when dry. Even then there is an improvement between the mortar used at Meidum and that at the beginning of the BP which changed further still. By the time of G1 it was refined even more being more of finer "plaster mortar".

One of the many problems with all this is that Davidovitz only seems to apply geoplymer use to G1 and yet there are 5 other great pyramids of the period not to mention several satellite pyramids let alone all those that came after that this geoplymer business does not apply. So apparently these were all built "the old fashioned way" and G1 was built the magic geoplymer way which looks exactly just like the old fashioned way.

> However, again the basalt paving could simply be
> the simple gypsum or lime mortar used by the AE
> (or restorers) but even so, they HAD actually
> developed cement or mortar, and according to you
> or someone else 500,000 tons of it?

The Great Pyramid Ancient Egypt Revisited, John Romer p157.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05-Jan-20 16:37 by Thanos5150.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 1602 Corpuscles 21-Dec-19 17:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 225 Open mind 22-Dec-19 02:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 192 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 05:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 165 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 122 thinkitover 23-Dec-19 10:05
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 204 ocka 22-Dec-19 09:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 158 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 18:01
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 155 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiahuanaco architect named 119 molder 23-Dec-19 22:16
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 119 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:44
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 120 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:47
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 100 Hanslune 25-Dec-19 01:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 156 Thanos5150 25-Dec-19 02:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 Hanslune 27-Dec-19 23:09
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 109 Thanos5150 28-Dec-19 17:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 118 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 06:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Merrell 29-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 101 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 20:31
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Merrell 29-Dec-19 23:54
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:03
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 88 Merrell 01-Jan-20 10:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 84 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 97 Open mind 31-Dec-19 19:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 81 Merrell 31-Dec-19 23:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 82 Open mind 01-Jan-20 03:02
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 126 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 04:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 05:51
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 108 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 06:59
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 101 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 19:40
Basalt Pavers 93 Barbelo 01-Jan-20 21:33
Re: Basalt Pavers 92 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 23:01
Re: Basalt Pavers 86 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 03:36
Re: Basalt Pavers 99 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:42
Re: Basalt Pavers 85 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 06:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 02:17
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:03
Basalt Pillar 108 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 07:15
Re: Basalt Pillar 90 Open mind 02-Jan-20 15:43
Re: Basalt Pillar 105 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 19:06
Re: Basalt Pillar 95 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 121 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 18:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 116 Merrell 02-Jan-20 18:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 153 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 11:15
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 20:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Merrell 03-Jan-20 21:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 23:23
Sacsayhuaman 102 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 02:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 102 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 03:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 98 Thanos5150 04-Jan-20 03:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 94 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 05:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 139 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 11:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 91 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 93 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 20:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 82 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:55
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 21:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 87 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 23:40
Re: Sacsayhuaman 87 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:59
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Open mind 06-Jan-20 01:08
Re: Sacsayhuaman 78 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 02:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 88 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 03:50
Re: Sacsayhuaman 87 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 04:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 95 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 05:10
Re: Sacsayhuaman 100 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:47
Re: Sacsayhuaman 106 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 16:53
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 19:06
The Limestone Puddle 81 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:27
Re: Sacsayhuaman 85 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 21:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 22:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 98 Thanos5150 07-Jan-20 17:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:48
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Open mind 06-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 85 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 21:30
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 07-Jan-20 20:43
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 06-Jan-20 13:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 11:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 81 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 10:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 seasmith 06-Jan-20 14:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 20:46
Re: Sacsayhuaman 76 Open mind 06-Jan-20 16:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Open mind 07-Jan-20 15:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 92 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:25
Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 78 Barbelo 07-Jan-20 23:51
Re: Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 91 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 01:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 79 Open mind 08-Jan-20 00:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 00:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 01:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 08-Jan-20 02:06
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 03:20
Re: Sacsayhuaman 100 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 07:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 74 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 12:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 76 Open mind 08-Jan-20 16:42
Re: Sacsayhuaman 78 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 18:24
Re: Sacsayhuaman 68 Open mind 08-Jan-20 20:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 21:44
LImestone vs Limestone 72 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 22:40
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 89 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 23:47
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 79 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 01:57
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 84 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 03:09
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 86 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 04:07
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 76 Open mind 09-Jan-20 16:06
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 74 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 20:49
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 73 Open mind 09-Jan-20 20:58
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 90 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 21:20
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 73 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:12
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 83 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 17:15
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 77 Open mind 09-Jan-20 15:25
Re:Sacsayhuaman 68 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 07:00
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 69 Open mind 10-Jan-20 13:15
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 95 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 14:34
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 67 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:47
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 77 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 73 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 69 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:00
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 93 Thanos5150 09-Jan-20 01:44
Tombomachay 88 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 06:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 80 Barbelo 10-Jan-20 07:30
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 145 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 11:41
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 92 Barbelo 11-Jan-20 05:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 85 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 01:24
Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 90 Barbelo 12-Jan-20 12:11
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 99 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 20:56
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 100 Open mind 13-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Sacsayhuaman 70 Open mind 08-Jan-20 23:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 79 Open mind 08-Jan-20 14:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 70 Merrell 08-Jan-20 17:57
On the fence... 81 Racho 08-Jan-20 04:51
Re: On the fence... 75 Open mind 08-Jan-20 15:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Merrell 04-Jan-20 09:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 09:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 86 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 00:34
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 73 Open mind 05-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 86 Open mind 02-Jan-20 03:37
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Merrell 01-Jan-20 14:10
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 84 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 125 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 111 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:30
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Open mind 22-Dec-19 22:12
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 112 WVK 23-Dec-19 15:21
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Open mind 23-Dec-19 23:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 116 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 22:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 113 seasmith 23-Dec-19 03:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 107 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 07:20
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 09:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 122 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 111 Hanslune 24-Dec-19 22:35
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 172 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 19:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 174 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 166 Enigcom 02-Jan-20 17:29


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.