Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Dr T
Thank you for posting the information in particular the book (article). Much appreciated.
Dr. Troglodyte Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...
>
> Source: “Dated Texts of the Old Kingdom”,
> Anthony Spalinger, Studien zur Altägyptischen
> Kultur © 1994, Pages 285, 318 and 319.
>
>
> Note to the serious student: The whole of the
> article contains scholarly merit. In particular,
> the Addendum contains cogent discourse
> ”concerning the intricate question of regnal
> year dating in the Old Kingdom”, amplifying
> a transitional intercalation from the ‘cattle
> count’, while recognizing the import of the
> maturing organizational bureaucracy.
>
I would not call myself serious student but that subject has fascinated me for a while.
Will read at least the Addendum
For others I found it can be read free of charge online. HERE

> From the ”Addendum: Meidum Dates”:
>
We have strayed off the (intended?) topic of thread a little?, but interesting.
I cannot help wonder what any lurkers make of all this particularly: the "lost civilization", or "aliens did it" or "much older than AE pyramid alt's and the remaining few Creighton fans"
sorry SARCASM ALERT
They must think Vyse Hill Perring et al , were extremely busy Hoaxers, putting all these graffiti quarry marks all over Egypt showing they were in fact built in OK DE?
Thank you for posting the information in particular the book (article). Much appreciated.
Dr. Troglodyte Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...
>
> Source: “Dated Texts of the Old Kingdom”,
> Anthony Spalinger, Studien zur Altägyptischen
> Kultur © 1994, Pages 285, 318 and 319.
>
>
> Note to the serious student: The whole of the
> article contains scholarly merit. In particular,
> the Addendum contains cogent discourse
> ”concerning the intricate question of regnal
> year dating in the Old Kingdom”, amplifying
> a transitional intercalation from the ‘cattle
> count’, while recognizing the import of the
> maturing organizational bureaucracy.
>
I would not call myself serious student but that subject has fascinated me for a while.
Will read at least the Addendum
For others I found it can be read free of charge online. HERE

> From the ”Addendum: Meidum Dates”:
>
Quote
”The following are the graffiti listed
> by Posener-Kriéger that should be added to our
> analysis. Those without dates are ignored.
> All relate to Snefru.
>
> (5) Year of the 17 occurrence: Graffiti A 12-21
> with A 23-26 to be added possibly A 22 is to be
> set in the same group.”
We have strayed off the (intended?) topic of thread a little?, but interesting.
I cannot help wonder what any lurkers make of all this particularly: the "lost civilization", or "aliens did it" or "much older than AE pyramid alt's and the remaining few Creighton fans"
sorry SARCASM ALERT
They must think Vyse Hill Perring et al , were extremely busy Hoaxers, putting all these graffiti quarry marks all over Egypt showing they were in fact built in OK DE?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.