Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Then again, how far to the right is he waving?
> >
> > As to the right, tolerably clear in the
> Lepsiuslithograph,
> > e, is another example of the “White Crown”
> ˤpr name.
> >
> > The same in Perring:
> >
> >
> https://digi.ub.uniheidelberg.de/diglit/perring1839bd1/0017
> >
> > Has Hawass misread these “remains of
> graffiti”
> > as remains of a date?
> >
> > M.
>
> See also A here:
>
> http://tudigit.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/show/gr-Fol-3-315/0009
>
> This publication of Lepsius dates to 1842 and so
> precedes his expedition. The presence of these
> particular illustrations (A–E) tends to confirm
> what Markus Pössel and I had conjectured, that
> the
> Lepsius
> version was based on Hill and Perring and
> not on new drawings made in Egypt.
>
> Hill also copied the group which Hawass appears to
> have misread as a date. In his 1:1
> “facsimile” it is plainly an example of the
> “White Crown” ˤpr name based on the
> royal name H̱nmw Ḫwj=f-wj (as spoken by
> Hawass).
>
> M.

Thanks for taking the trouble to clarify that. It is clearer (to me) in the Lepsius copy.

Still no numbers! and extremely unlikely to be any date!!

Quote
M Stower
We notice that we are not given anything like a clear view of what he is waving at and for the last bit it cuts to a view of his face. Which has me thinking again of just how fake it all is. Was this a serious statement, or mere performance? "

I mustered up some enthusiasm to watch the whole vid. It is now clear (to me imho) there was scripted phony drama inserted to suit History Chanel & Hawass's agenda. Still some good footage of access to chambers and some glyphs.

Pity those young girls have photo's which many have yearned to see for a long time and yet were not seemingly shared publicly.

Much appreciated
cheers