Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> This is the magic of Wikipedia and why it is not
> to be used as a source. When I edited it in 2013 I
> knew the gang name was wrong, but had no reason to
> doubt the count was there so did not bother to
> check Verner. This is like a dog chasing its own
> tail at this point as the lore of Hawass
> "rediscovering" comes from WP, but the source it
> uses says this is not the case, but then since
> this time Hawass is certain it is there and he has
> seen it and even shown it to others. WTF?

I have changed the WP page to include this with the Guardians and Verner links as sources:

Though Zahi Hawass has reported locating the inscription of the date given by Petrie, there is also some debate whether Petrie may have mistakenly relied on other sources as the inscription has otherwise yet to be found [19][20].

Verner has given us a clue however as Hawass must have published this survey which I now recall reading a paper of his that said this was forthcoming as well, but couldn't find it.