Quote

We can argue til we are blue in the face about How blocks were moved and why, but we cannot deny the FACT that it took a highly sophisticated society to create and maintain the nationwide infrastructure that this discovery has revealed.

No such "infrastructure" has been "revealed" by Merer's Diary.

The simple fact is that Egyptologists (you) recognize no infrastructure. Even Dr Lehner has ripped the builders out of the builders village and condemned them to sleep on ramps. Therefore the "builders village" is no longer infrastructure. Across the board infrastructure for tombs and construction is noted by its absence. It mustta been ramps as proven by their absence since they were removed when it was completed. They mustta been tombs because no one would remove the bodies and loot unless they were valuable.

It was ALREADY KNOWN that stone for the cladding was hauled across the river because the stone originated at Turah and THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY TO GET IT TO GIZA, unless you believe aliens flew it the other way around the planet.

So what infrastructure are you even talking about? Where are the space ships, ramps, and cranes? Where did the builders sleep? What kind of air did they breath? It was YOUR idea that this discovery means something important or earth shaking. What exactly is it?

Quote

This is where we can learn from them. This is the potential that Scott is obfuscating with his continuing nonsense and blatant disregard for the facts.

What have we learned? What do you believe there might be to learn? Why do you thing Scott Creighton is ignoring ANY FACT AT ALL? What fact do you believe he is ignoring? How is attacking assumptions an "obfuscation"? You (Egyptologists) believe you have all the answers so it's not necessary to say what you mean but just to exchange knowing winks. I've mentioned it before but EVERY SINGLE alt thinks you are wrong and I think you are wrong about EVERY SINGLE thing. Scott Creighton is looking at real evidence instead of beliefs and assumptions. He is looking at the assumptions that underlie Egyptological beliefs. Belief is enough for you and enough for Egyptology. It's not enough for Creight or most alts.

I don't think Creighton is obfuscating, I think you are. I think you and a cabal here are trying to silence opposition to Egyptological assumptions. I think you want to continue your MO of isolating alts and teaming up against them. I think you want to protect your assumptions by any means and will even go so far as to suggest that Merer's Diary proves you were right all along even though every single detail of this diary suggests you might be wrong about everything (including Merer's Diary). And then you pretend I'm off topic. You make me repeat the same damn arguments a million times because you REFUSE TO READ THEM OR CHALLENGE THEM and then you cry I'm repeating myself. Then people wonder why I say it is we who are the stinky footed bumpkins. I think people see what they expect and what they believe and it seems natural to you that primitive and superstitious people can make a pyramid with no infrastructure and lots of superstition.

I don't think it's right that I answer every single question put to me and Egyptology can't be bothered to defend their assumptions, answer eMails, or even to explain why they believe what they do without citing et als.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Nov-19 23:24 by cladking.