Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

We can argue til we are blue in the face about How blocks were moved and why, but we cannot deny the FACT that it took a highly sophisticated society to create and maintain the nationwide infrastructure that this discovery has revealed.

No such "infrastructure" has been "revealed" by Merer's Diary.

The simple fact is that Egyptologists (you) recognize no infrastructure. Even Dr Lehner has ripped the builders out of the builders village and condemned them to sleep on ramps. Therefore the "builders village" is no longer infrastructure. Across the board infrastructure for tombs and construction is noted by its absence. It mustta been ramps as proven by their absence since they were removed when it was completed. They mustta been tombs because no one would remove the bodies and loot unless they were valuable.

It was ALREADY KNOWN that stone for the cladding was hauled across the river because the stone originated at Turah and THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY TO GET IT TO GIZA, unless you believe aliens flew it the other way around the planet.

So what infrastructure are you even talking about? Where are the space ships, ramps, and cranes? Where did the builders sleep? What kind of air did they breath? It was YOUR idea that this discovery means something important or earth shaking. What exactly is it?

Quote

This is where we can learn from them. This is the potential that Scott is obfuscating with his continuing nonsense and blatant disregard for the facts.

What have we learned? What do you believe there might be to learn? Why do you thing Scott Creighton is ignoring ANY FACT AT ALL? What fact do you believe he is ignoring? How is attacking assumptions an "obfuscation"? You (Egyptologists) believe you have all the answers so it's not necessary to say what you mean but just to exchange knowing winks. I've mentioned it before but EVERY SINGLE alt thinks you are wrong and I think you are wrong about EVERY SINGLE thing. Scott Creighton is looking at real evidence instead of beliefs and assumptions. He is looking at the assumptions that underlie Egyptological beliefs. Belief is enough for you and enough for Egyptology. It's not enough for Creight or most alts.

I don't think Creighton is obfuscating, I think you are. I think you and a cabal here are trying to silence opposition to Egyptological assumptions. I think you want to continue your MO of isolating alts and teaming up against them. I think you want to protect your assumptions by any means and will even go so far as to suggest that Merer's Diary proves you were right all along even though every single detail of this diary suggests you might be wrong about everything (including Merer's Diary). And then you pretend I'm off topic. You make me repeat the same damn arguments a million times because you REFUSE TO READ THEM OR CHALLENGE THEM and then you cry I'm repeating myself. Then people wonder why I say it is we who are the stinky footed bumpkins. I think people see what they expect and what they believe and it seems natural to you that primitive and superstitious people can make a pyramid with no infrastructure and lots of superstition.

I don't think it's right that I answer every single question put to me and Egyptology can't be bothered to defend their assumptions, answer eMails, or even to explain why they believe what they do without citing et als.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Nov-19 23:24 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 1730 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 11:13
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 351 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 11:33
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 322 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 13:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 190 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 20:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 274 Thanos5150 30-Oct-19 16:10
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 255 Warwick 30-Oct-19 20:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 298 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 20:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 213 Corpuscles 31-Oct-19 01:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 252 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 11:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 146 Merrell 22-Nov-19 16:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 243 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 13:34
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 235 PB Bytes 19-Nov-19 00:24
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 185 Thanos5150 19-Nov-19 16:55
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 143 engbren 21-Nov-19 11:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 162 Martin Stower 21-Nov-19 14:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 134 engbren 22-Nov-19 11:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 145 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 15:06
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 137 Hanslune 22-Nov-19 15:32
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 152 sfbey 22-Nov-19 18:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 130 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:19
2 responces . . 148 Warwick 22-Nov-19 19:32
Re: 2 responces . . 165 cladking 22-Nov-19 21:14
Re: 2 responces . . 166 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 21:29
Re: 2 responces . . 228 cladking 23-Nov-19 02:14
Deleted the same attempts to get people to respond to him 143 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 04:04
Ah, how rare Cladking hijacking a thread 130 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:18
Re: 2 responces . . 140 Mayavitch 26-Nov-19 22:33
Re: 2 responces . . 107 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 144 PB Bytes 23-Nov-19 17:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 142 Merrell 24-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 166 Lee McGiffen 24-Nov-19 13:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 154 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 129 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 145 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:26
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 124 engbren 25-Nov-19 06:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 136 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 149 cladking 25-Nov-19 17:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 212 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:02
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 131 Merrell 25-Nov-19 09:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 152 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 137 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 137 Merrell 26-Nov-19 17:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 152 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 06:19
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 127 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 05:47
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 116 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 125 Merrell 28-Nov-19 10:25
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 118 Merrell 28-Nov-19 14:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 124 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 125 Merrell 28-Nov-19 17:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 121 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 18:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 120 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 20:20
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 113 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 21:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 131 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 00:19
Petrie’s Confusion Problem 173 Dr. Troglodyte 01-Dec-19 19:54
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 184 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:51
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 114 Merrell 02-Dec-19 10:03
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 147 Martin Stower 02-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 117 Thanos5150 03-Dec-19 16:54
as far as that goes..... 101 Warwick 03-Dec-19 18:20
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 147 Martin Stower 03-Dec-19 19:32
Tunnel vision 526 Warwick 04-Dec-19 20:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 127 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 21:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 113 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 21:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 147 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 22:28
“. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 186 Martin Stower 29-Nov-19 14:50
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 117 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 19:03
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 114 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:44
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 118 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 01:02
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 118 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 05:31
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 124 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 06:11
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 124 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 12:49
From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 132 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 14:38
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 112 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:34
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 119 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 16:57
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 119 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 17:43
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 109 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:31
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 119 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 18:46
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 114 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:55
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 118 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 19:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 105 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:04
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 118 Merrell 30-Nov-19 21:22
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 108 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:12
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 113 Thanos5150 01-Dec-19 00:25
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 113 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 00:54
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 146 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 01:37
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 119 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 115 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:55
Hawass: other possible slips 121 Merrell 01-Dec-19 15:28
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 118 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 19:16
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 97 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:32
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 119 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:38
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 98 Merrell 30-Nov-19 18:14
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 162 Merrell 25-Nov-19 23:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 130 Thanos5150 26-Nov-19 16:38
Infrastructure . 133 Warwick 26-Nov-19 17:29
What Irony? n/t 121 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:05
do TRY being objective 111 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:14
Re: do TRY being objective 131 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:25
so you choose subjective 122 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:49
Re: so you choose subjective 128 cladking 26-Nov-19 23:17
Re: so you choose subjective 136 Warwick 27-Nov-19 02:51
So You Evade the Subject Again. 188 cladking 27-Nov-19 03:43
Re: So You Evade the Subject Again. 102 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:29
Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 102 cladking 27-Nov-19 18:11
Re: Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 114 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:21
Cladking hijacks another thread and makes it about ramps - again 97 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:39
Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 142 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 12:58
Re: Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 104 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:41
A better idea 103 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 18:12
New from K-tel 111 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:16
Re: New from K-tel 113 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 00:08
Re: New from K-tel 129 Lee McGiffen 28-Nov-19 01:46
Re: New from K-tel 237 cladking 28-Nov-19 01:57
Re: New from K-tel 109 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 16:40
Putting this to bed 106 Warwick 28-Nov-19 18:11
Re: so you choose subjective 112 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 19:11
Re: so you choose subjective 98 Warwick 28-Nov-19 20:44
Classic unintended comedy! 154 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 13:04
Re: Infrastructure . 121 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 00:15
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 131 Merrell 26-Nov-19 18:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 114 Merrell 28-Nov-19 22:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 126 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 03:37
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 97 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:26
Ahket . 142 Warwick 25-Nov-19 17:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 174 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 16:27
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 132 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 00:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 122 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 00:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 134 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:08
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 124 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 05:49
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 132 Merrell 25-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 108 seasmith 25-Nov-19 22:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 102 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 109 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 103 seasmith 25-Nov-19 23:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 100 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:23
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 124 Martin Stower 26-Nov-19 14:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 107 seasmith 27-Nov-19 02:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 120 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 16:59
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 139 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 131 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 17:21
not Graffiti 133 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:47
Re: not Graffiti 142 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 21:51
Monkey see.. 150 Warwick 24-Nov-19 23:40
Re: not Graffiti 164 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 21:58
Please, for God’s sake, . . . 795 Martin Stower 27-Nov-19 19:52
Mods can you stop Cladking from hijacking this thread? 147 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:41
Mod Warning > General OP Hijacking 181 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-19 17:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.