Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

We can argue til we are blue in the face about How blocks were moved and why, but we cannot deny the FACT that it took a highly sophisticated society to create and maintain the nationwide infrastructure that this discovery has revealed.

No such "infrastructure" has been "revealed" by Merer's Diary.

The simple fact is that Egyptologists (you) recognize no infrastructure. Even Dr Lehner has ripped the builders out of the builders village and condemned them to sleep on ramps. Therefore the "builders village" is no longer infrastructure. Across the board infrastructure for tombs and construction is noted by its absence. It mustta been ramps as proven by their absence since they were removed when it was completed. They mustta been tombs because no one would remove the bodies and loot unless they were valuable.

It was ALREADY KNOWN that stone for the cladding was hauled across the river because the stone originated at Turah and THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY TO GET IT TO GIZA, unless you believe aliens flew it the other way around the planet.

So what infrastructure are you even talking about? Where are the space ships, ramps, and cranes? Where did the builders sleep? What kind of air did they breath? It was YOUR idea that this discovery means something important or earth shaking. What exactly is it?

Quote

This is where we can learn from them. This is the potential that Scott is obfuscating with his continuing nonsense and blatant disregard for the facts.

What have we learned? What do you believe there might be to learn? Why do you thing Scott Creighton is ignoring ANY FACT AT ALL? What fact do you believe he is ignoring? How is attacking assumptions an "obfuscation"? You (Egyptologists) believe you have all the answers so it's not necessary to say what you mean but just to exchange knowing winks. I've mentioned it before but EVERY SINGLE alt thinks you are wrong and I think you are wrong about EVERY SINGLE thing. Scott Creighton is looking at real evidence instead of beliefs and assumptions. He is looking at the assumptions that underlie Egyptological beliefs. Belief is enough for you and enough for Egyptology. It's not enough for Creight or most alts.

I don't think Creighton is obfuscating, I think you are. I think you and a cabal here are trying to silence opposition to Egyptological assumptions. I think you want to continue your MO of isolating alts and teaming up against them. I think you want to protect your assumptions by any means and will even go so far as to suggest that Merer's Diary proves you were right all along even though every single detail of this diary suggests you might be wrong about everything (including Merer's Diary). And then you pretend I'm off topic. You make me repeat the same damn arguments a million times because you REFUSE TO READ THEM OR CHALLENGE THEM and then you cry I'm repeating myself. Then people wonder why I say it is we who are the stinky footed bumpkins. I think people see what they expect and what they believe and it seems natural to you that primitive and superstitious people can make a pyramid with no infrastructure and lots of superstition.

I don't think it's right that I answer every single question put to me and Egyptology can't be bothered to defend their assumptions, answer eMails, or even to explain why they believe what they do without citing et als.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Nov-19 23:24 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 1891 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 11:13
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 419 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 11:33
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 391 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 13:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 249 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 20:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 336 Thanos5150 30-Oct-19 16:10
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 316 Warwick 30-Oct-19 20:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 362 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 20:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 280 Corpuscles 31-Oct-19 01:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 328 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 11:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 206 Merrell 22-Nov-19 16:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 311 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 13:34
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 300 PB Bytes 19-Nov-19 00:24
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 242 Thanos5150 19-Nov-19 16:55
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 208 engbren 21-Nov-19 11:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 230 Martin Stower 21-Nov-19 14:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 193 engbren 22-Nov-19 11:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 217 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 15:06
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 199 Hanslune 22-Nov-19 15:32
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 238 sfbey 22-Nov-19 18:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 197 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:19
2 responces . . 201 Warwick 22-Nov-19 19:32
Re: 2 responces . . 221 cladking 22-Nov-19 21:14
Re: 2 responces . . 226 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 21:29
Re: 2 responces . . 299 cladking 23-Nov-19 02:14
Deleted the same attempts to get people to respond to him 205 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 04:04
Ah, how rare Cladking hijacking a thread 187 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:18
Re: 2 responces . . 195 Mayavitch 26-Nov-19 22:33
Re: 2 responces . . 161 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 202 PB Bytes 23-Nov-19 17:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 205 Merrell 24-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 234 Lee McGiffen 24-Nov-19 13:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 219 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 191 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 201 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:26
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 180 engbren 25-Nov-19 06:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 196 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 204 cladking 25-Nov-19 17:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 275 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:02
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 191 Merrell 25-Nov-19 09:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 211 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 193 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 207 Merrell 26-Nov-19 17:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 220 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 06:19
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 185 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 05:47
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 175 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 183 Merrell 28-Nov-19 10:25
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 176 Merrell 28-Nov-19 14:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 186 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 178 Merrell 28-Nov-19 17:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 172 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 18:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 180 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 20:20
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 172 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 21:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 186 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 00:19
Petrie’s Confusion Problem 246 Dr. Troglodyte 01-Dec-19 19:54
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 243 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:51
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 174 Merrell 02-Dec-19 10:03
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 204 Martin Stower 02-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 173 Thanos5150 03-Dec-19 16:54
as far as that goes..... 162 Warwick 03-Dec-19 18:20
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 217 Martin Stower 03-Dec-19 19:32
Tunnel vision 737 Warwick 04-Dec-19 20:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 198 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 21:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 172 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 21:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 223 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 22:28
“. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 267 Martin Stower 29-Nov-19 14:50
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 179 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 19:03
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 170 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:44
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 175 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 01:02
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 177 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 05:31
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 186 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 06:11
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 193 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 12:49
From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 212 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 14:38
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 170 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:34
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 181 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 16:57
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 176 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 17:43
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 168 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:31
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 191 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 18:46
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 174 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:55
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 192 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 19:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 156 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:04
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 174 Merrell 30-Nov-19 21:22
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 158 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:12
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 164 Thanos5150 01-Dec-19 00:25
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 186 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 00:54
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 209 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 01:37
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 189 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 190 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:55
Hawass: other possible slips 181 Merrell 01-Dec-19 15:28
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 181 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 19:16
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 158 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:32
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 182 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:38
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 152 Merrell 30-Nov-19 18:14
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 226 Merrell 25-Nov-19 23:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 191 Thanos5150 26-Nov-19 16:38
Infrastructure . 198 Warwick 26-Nov-19 17:29
What Irony? n/t 186 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:05
do TRY being objective 167 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:14
Re: do TRY being objective 191 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:25
so you choose subjective 182 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:49
Re: so you choose subjective 180 cladking 26-Nov-19 23:17
Re: so you choose subjective 195 Warwick 27-Nov-19 02:51
So You Evade the Subject Again. 256 cladking 27-Nov-19 03:43
Re: So You Evade the Subject Again. 155 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:29
Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 160 cladking 27-Nov-19 18:11
Re: Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 173 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:21
Cladking hijacks another thread and makes it about ramps - again 144 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:39
Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 191 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 12:58
Re: Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 153 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:41
A better idea 162 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 18:12
New from K-tel 175 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:16
Re: New from K-tel 160 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 00:08
Re: New from K-tel 188 Lee McGiffen 28-Nov-19 01:46
Re: New from K-tel 292 cladking 28-Nov-19 01:57
Re: New from K-tel 165 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 16:40
Putting this to bed 158 Warwick 28-Nov-19 18:11
Re: so you choose subjective 157 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 19:11
Re: so you choose subjective 154 Warwick 28-Nov-19 20:44
Classic unintended comedy! 213 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 13:04
Re: Infrastructure . 174 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 00:15
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 188 Merrell 26-Nov-19 18:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 162 Merrell 28-Nov-19 22:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 184 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 03:37
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 146 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:26
Ahket . 192 Warwick 25-Nov-19 17:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 231 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 16:27
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 182 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 00:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 181 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 00:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 188 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:08
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 185 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 05:49
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 190 Merrell 25-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 154 seasmith 25-Nov-19 22:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 156 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 163 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 160 seasmith 25-Nov-19 23:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 152 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:23
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 177 Martin Stower 26-Nov-19 14:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 168 seasmith 27-Nov-19 02:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 171 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 16:59
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 189 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 186 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 17:21
not Graffiti 189 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:47
Re: not Graffiti 196 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 21:51
Monkey see.. 203 Warwick 24-Nov-19 23:40
Re: not Graffiti 216 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 21:58
Please, for God’s sake, . . . 849 Martin Stower 27-Nov-19 19:52
Mods can you stop Cladking from hijacking this thread? 198 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:41
Mod Warning > General OP Hijacking 238 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-19 17:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.