Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll just ask a question.
>
> Do you agree that Great works found throughout
> ancient Egypt were dependant on a functioning
> infrastructure?
>
> Yes or no?

Obviously.

But the subject here is the great pyramids and the Great Pyramid in particular. This effort required extensive infrastructure and a remarkable ability to make it function in order to build. The pyramid's existence does not support Egyptological beliefs about when, how, why, or what it caused it to come into existence. You see all facts in terms of your assumptions. The pyramid does not prove your beliefs in anything at all. It does not support any belief beyond the simple fact that they mustta had the means to build it or had alien, giant, or Atlantean friends who could do it. It's Egyptologists who can SEE NO INFRASTRUCTURE AT ALL at Giza and writes off ALL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE as red herrings. The landscape is full of ports, ramps, and infrastructure to build pyramids but Egyptologists call it all "temples", "holy walkways", "holy pavement", "holy boat pits", "holy etc", "holy etc", "holy etc", "holy etc".

Bumpkinhood is not infrastructure. They could not lift stones with superstition. What is so hard to understand about any of this?