Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
seasmith Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Merrell Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > seasmith Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > R. Pearse routinely equates the translated
> term
> > "
> > > akhet- khufu" as the Great Pyramid.
> > >
> > > How do we know for sure it is specifically
> the
> > > pyramid, and not the Giza Plateau, which Is
> an
> > > actual 'horizon' ?
> >
> >
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,11
>
> > 33868,1133982#msg-1133982]This post[/url] (and
> the
> > quoted material) might help to answer your
> > question.
>
> ´´´
>
> Thank you Merrell, I've been reading back through
> many of these related posts for couple weeks now
> (just a gloss on years of postings, true ), and
> like you I've only been able to find
> circumstantial evidence thus far.
> Keep looking i guess ...
IOWs the more one looks the more circumstantial evidence on finds
at what point does one have enough circumstantial evidence to justify taking the step from possible/plausible, to probable?
I cede that this argument, for some, goes both ways.
Putting it another way.
At what point does such a flood of circumstantial evidence require the critic to provide evidence for a viable alternate explanation?
Warwick
-------------------------------------------------------
> Merrell Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > seasmith Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > R. Pearse routinely equates the translated
> term
> > "
> > > akhet- khufu" as the Great Pyramid.
> > >
> > > How do we know for sure it is specifically
> the
> > > pyramid, and not the Giza Plateau, which Is
> an
> > > actual 'horizon' ?
> >
> >
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,11
>
> > 33868,1133982#msg-1133982]This post[/url] (and
> the
> > quoted material) might help to answer your
> > question.
>
> ´´´
>
> Thank you Merrell, I've been reading back through
> many of these related posts for couple weeks now
> (just a gloss on years of postings, true ), and
> like you I've only been able to find
> circumstantial evidence thus far.
> Keep looking i guess ...
IOWs the more one looks the more circumstantial evidence on finds
at what point does one have enough circumstantial evidence to justify taking the step from possible/plausible, to probable?
I cede that this argument, for some, goes both ways.
Putting it another way.
At what point does such a flood of circumstantial evidence require the critic to provide evidence for a viable alternate explanation?
Warwick
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.