> His threshold for calling someone an
> “Egyptologist” has never been high.
> The problem with his calling Lorraine Evans one
> was explained to him in this discussion:
I have sympathy for any underpinning desire to promote your ( & colleague's) work.
Unfortunately, the modus operandi, of the fringe "alternative" has been perfected to shun any discussion of their wacko theories, and stick exclusively to preaching to the gullible, uniformed, disinterested (in facts) and fantasising fools, far away from critical analysis.
You will note even on his own website, our host, does not contribute ( except, someone posts ,perhaps the real deal?, on AoM a brief welcome to other fringe writers - but some worthy of some time)
I think Lorraine Evans ought enjoy the loosely deemed status as "Egyptologist", despite any lack of specific PhD.
Apparently, she studied such :
Lorraine studied Ancient History, Egyptology and Archaeology at University College London and the University of London respectively. She is currently a Research Fellow at the IIPSGP and is studying for her PhD. She is author of the best-selling book Kingdom of the Ark, together with Warrior Women of Northern Europe and Murder at Medinet Habu - A Heritage Tour Guide, the first in her mini-heritage tour series. Lorraine is at the forefront of historical revisionism
Anyway, you are a PROVEN excellent researcher . I ask is not SC's wife's maiden name "nee - Evans"??????? -mother in law ????
Lorraine claims to reside in London but most of her blog is about Scotland.
LonelyAngel, was and will ever only be a troll! (poor effort at that) A few reasonable witty gutter (grog related) retorts was all he/it was capable of producing!
Creighton's, "independent researchers and "experts" were just naïve pawns and flunkies, in his grand Hoax deception.
It is a pity you pitched the title (of your books Vol I and Vol lI) and the essence biographical content to a relatively unknown (very limited known appeal) individual.
However, Strange Journey Vol I & II
highly recommended to anyone seeking clarification and the facts and the truth.
Taking a bet from LonelyAss?.... and expecting anything but renege? That would be foolish.
As for support for his ideas
I think Graham Hancock ought be utterly ashamed , if he endorsed and actually wrote with his own hand /mind ,this cover promotional rubbish.
Buaval and Hancock
Egyptologists consider the ochre-painted Khufu cartouche in the Great Pyramid as the ultimate proof that this pyramid belongs to the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. But much controversy surrounds its authenticity. If the Khufu cartouche is indeed a hoax, then the implications are tremendous.
A powerfully-argued demolition of the 'facts' on which Egyptologists base their claim that the Great Pyramid was built by the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. Scott Creighton's excellent new book The Great Pyramid Hoax is a first-class forensic investigation that Egyptologists should really be paying a great deal of attention to, because it pulls the rug of their chronology right out from under their feet.
You will note Bauval was much more guarded and less committed (embellished bold large print mine)
As spelt out CLEARLY in Thanos5150 post
Sad you have to give that name any oxygen. He is a liar and an oxygen thief.
Edit: Shocking (bad) grammar correction ( a confusing double negative) but sorry about the remainder?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 31-Oct-19 04:45 by Corpuscles.