Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Susan Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course, it may turn out that conventional AE
> archaeology could be overturned, but it shows no
> signs of being so at present
Your terminology leaves little to be desired, but to take your meaning, as it relates to an antediluvian lost civilization being responsible for the stone working of Egypt which I assume you are reffering to, I would agree, but this also is not to mean Egyptology has it all correct either nor that there have not been credible challenges to these interpretations, even among Egyptologists themselves, that would moderately to drastically change the narrative offered of AE history let alone world history at large. "Overturned", no, but altered significantly-no doubt.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course, it may turn out that conventional AE
> archaeology could be overturned, but it shows no
> signs of being so at present
Your terminology leaves little to be desired, but to take your meaning, as it relates to an antediluvian lost civilization being responsible for the stone working of Egypt which I assume you are reffering to, I would agree, but this also is not to mean Egyptology has it all correct either nor that there have not been credible challenges to these interpretations, even among Egyptologists themselves, that would moderately to drastically change the narrative offered of AE history let alone world history at large. "Overturned", no, but altered significantly-no doubt.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.