> Hello Lee
> My introduction to the writings of Graham Hancock
> was 'Fingerprints of the Gods' shortly after I'd
> finished reading a book entitled 'When the Sky
> Fell' by the Flem-Aths.
Never got around to When the Sky Fell, but I read the Atlantis Blueprint by the Flem Aths.
> I then read 'Keeper of Genesis' and was intrigued
> by the claim that seismic surveys had detected
> what might be man-made chambers beneath the
> Sphinx. This seemed to lend weight to the
> ramblings of the so-called 'sleeping prophet',
> Edgar Cayce, who had previously claimed that there
> was indeed a subterranean chamber yet to be
> Robert Schoch's claims that the type of erosion on
> the body of the Sphinx was caused by heavy
> rainfall and not wind erosion was also of interest
> to me.
> What I also find particularly baffling is that the
> 'entrance' to G1's sarcophagus chamber is little
> bigger than a crawl space. It seems to my mind
> somewhat unceremonial and undignified to drop the
> coffin, get on one's hands and knees and push it
> through the entrance. Naturally, some will argue
> that I am wrongly ascribing modern funerary
> traditions and practices to an ancient
> civilisation but it is something I have never been
> able to reconcile.
Imagine all the other indignities poor Khufu suffered just to get there, the least of which not being able to even go through his own mortuary temple and dragged up a temporary structure to get up to the entrance.
HERE. Not a single relevant response despite hundreds of views.
> I like to read the posts of others and don't
> always have anything to offer to the development
> of a discussion, so I keep quiet. Other times, I
> poke the dog with a stick.
It seems to me that for some of you, the ones who could make a more meaningful contribution, "poking the dog with a stick" is how you spend most of your time here. I mean, for example, what do you think of this Matt:
The Enigma of the Palace Facade Mastabas of the 1st Dynasty
No contribution from you, Martin, Dr T, ect. Or to most of the ideas I have presented here:
Mysteries: The Collected Works of Thanos5150
Its not about me, but rather these topics, that I do not understand why it is more interesting to argue with flat Earthers or the minutia of the Khufu cartouche for the umpteenth time or Cladking's stupid bullshit ad nauseum. And not just along with more interesting topics, but actually in lieu of? I am truly at a loss to understand why people care most about the things in reality they should care the least.
> I have always been - and remain - open to reading
> the work of authors regarded as 'fringe'.
> Those are some of the reasons which brought me to
> the site. I read articles from the News Desk, read
> threads on the message board and on occasions
> contribute something to a thread when I think I
> have something to offer, or a question I'd like to
> ask, prompted by reflection on the discussions I
> enjoy reading.
I suspect you had some Egyptology courses in your education?
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 09-Jul-19 15:58 by Thanos5150.