Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >...
> > You believe you're only "somewhat rude".
> That's
> > cute.
> >
> > EVERYBODY who doesn't accept Egyptological
> beliefs
> > is ignored.
>
> Sam,
>
> The emphatic, oft repeated, thrust of your posts
> herein this thread, and others not only recent
> times, is this word "ignored".
>
> It does not come across as merely a desperate plea
> for someone to deeply consider your viewpoint.
> However as genuine honest (intended) feedback to
> you it somewhat resembles an infant chucking a
> tanty in their cot throwing rattles and toys,
> bellowing in loud mournful sobs and cries for
> attention.
>
> It has developed to the point where almost any
> thread is invaded by your repetitious mumbo
> jumbo.
>
> This is not new . Last year Thanos5150 (in
> frustration) created a thread about it.
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,11
> 35946,1136042]30 days of Cladking[/url]
>
>
> [b]The polite course of action IS to simply IGNORE
> your repetitive rambling posts. MOST DO SO!
> DELIBERATELY![/b]
>
> Over the course of MORE THAN over a decade (not
> only here) you have been unsuccessful in promoting
> and gaining support for your unique musings.
>
> It is surely time for you to consider, where you
> have gone or got it wrong?
>
> So perhaps my euphemism "somewhat rude" ought be
> more honestly declared as downright harshly
> insulting!?
> But at least I reply. eyeofhorus33 is far more
> kind and considerate and continually attempts to
> try and guide you to better more complete
> knowledge but I see you are even stretching his
> patience to insult. Matt created this thread
> subtitle (not me!)
>
> If you are unable to pay anyone else the courtesy
> of considering any viewpoint other than your own
> the only thing left for GHMB members/contributors
> or the Egyptology fraternity or real scientists
> is to IGNORE YOU.
>
> There are dozens of occasional posters here that
> have far greater knowledge of Ancient Egypt than I
> do. Over the years probably number in the hundreds
> of such.
>
> Your contributions are merely assertions based on
> very limited knowledge. It seems as though you
> have closed your mind entirely. If that is the way
> you want it then again, the only possible course
> of action is to IGNORE YOU.
>
> I sympathise somewhat in that I too have been
> guilty in the past of making forceful assertions
> which were based on very limited knowledge and
> lack of consideration of the opposing evidence or
> the substantial basis for it.
>
> You are running out of time and seemingly getting
> more and more frustrated.
>
> As a suggestion to consider. Instead of making
> rambling threads about PT, [b]perhaps eat a
> little bit of humble pie[/b], and start a thread
> (s) SERIOUSLY asking for assistance of someone to
> assess aspects of (or the entirety) your proposal.
> Then SERIOUSLY HONESTLY addressing any
> clarification you receive, with the background
> thought that indeed you could be wrong? I suggest
> you clearly state that attitude upfront clearly
> first.
>
> If you are deluded by the massive number of views
> your PT threads get then I suggest it is most
> likely the weird aspect of human behaviour that
> slows down and gawks at a train wreck or accident
> or fascination of a comedian making a fool of
> themselves. You know that very few bother to post
> any reply or contribution.
>
> Genuine attempt to help.

What you may not realize is that this theory was built piecemeal over many years. It is still evolving and I'm still finding evidence and logic to support it. Over the years many parts have been modified or entirely excised. Much of it was done with the help of Egyptologists and highly knowledgeable amateurs. Indeed, they've done more to guide me than anyone though I get a lot of ideas and insights from alts. I have no real beef with Egyptologists other than they won't tell me when they know something that supports my theory and most tend to be highly dismissive. I'm merely repaying them in kind. I know things that support Egyptological opinion but would never mention them.

The primary problem here isn't the lack of communication, it's that they are wrong. They are wrong about everything and they don't discuss it or anything with anyone who doesn't accept their beliefs. "Egyptology" is very much the science of changeless bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps. Outside of this metaphysics there is no Egyptology. When Egyptology is looked at outside these assumptions nothing at all exists. This is why they don't defend them.

Frankly I believe the theory has gotten to the point that there are no longer ANY obvious contradictions with reality, reason, or physical evidence. This is the result of discussing this with numerous alts and believers. Everyone has contributed even if a lot of the help came as something other than constructive criticism. I read everything written by insightful or knowledgeable contributors on many sites but I greatly limit my response to a few threads on a few sites. You may find it incredible but Egyptological assumptions are bandied about as though they are truth without alts complaining about it. At least I never said, believed, or implied "they mustta used geysers" or that I can't be wrong just because logic and facts are on my side. Even with no evidence Egyptologists aver there is no doubt that they used ramps. At least I have evidence the stones were pulled straight up the sides.

I won't take your advice but only because I know the outcome. Believers are adept at gently steering people in the "right" direction. They'll talk about and explain endlessly about the gods and religion. They'd tell me about ramps and how superstition made people strong. While they don't "debate" they are great at lectures and many people find them convincing. I want to talk about facts and logic, not opinion. You aren't going to convince me someone knows exactly why geysers are impossible but won't post it because he wants to ignore me. Yeah, right! No, what I get more of is believers telling me there's no such thing as carbonated aquifers or cold water geysers. I get semantics and word games.

All the facts and logic are on my side. I'm not saying I am right, merely that Egyptologists have nothing to debate. They have nothing to support their positions that hasn't been trotted out many times before. Some of these "facts" are really quite embarrassing because they are word games, semantics, and obvious circular arguments.

I know you tried to be helpful and i appreciate it. I might even consider aspects of some of the advice. But until such time as Egyptology actually performs real science I fear their opinions are vacuous and determined much too much by appearances and much too little by evidence and reason. Has it ever occurred to you to question why very knowledgeable people like Manu don't just state specific reasons that I'm wrong? Has it ever occurred to you that people like Origyptian or Jon Ellison might not be deluded and stupid?

I'm here to discuss. If anyone doesn't want this then they should just not respond. I never twisted anyone's arms to talk.

Oh, and there's a simple reason for the high views of my PT threads. It's part of the method of my madness. People do read the PT and then they google passages because no one understands any of it. They google my posts so my ideas get out to those who need them most; newbies who are trying to make heads or tails of the passages. Frankly I suspect even a few Egyptologists look in on them. No, they don't believe me but anyone paying attention will see I'm always right in a left handed sort of way. Just as Egyptological interpretations aid me in understanding author intent, my crazy interpretations are guiding some to understanding what all the et als were getting at. Diabolical isn't it? I'll win this argument in the long run one little bit at a time. Eventually the logic of pulling stones straight up the side will winm because it's what fits the logic and facts. Until Egyptologists actually do science, I win. Of course, I believe I'll win even sooner if they do real science. Heads I win, tails I win. ...and when it lands on the edge I can read your mind. ;)

Of course I'm no expert and never claimed to be. I merely claim to have solved a bunch of mysteries and made some important rediscoveries. If reality were open to vote I'd couldn't be more wrong.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Egyptology debate 1329 ptutaki@gmail.com 01-Apr-19 20:14
Re: Egyptology debate 383 cladking 01-Apr-19 22:02
Re: Egyptology debate 371 Martin Stower 01-Apr-19 22:30
Re: Egyptology debate 285 Brian Patterson 01-Apr-19 23:30
Re: Egyptology debate 292 cladking 02-Apr-19 00:12
Re: Egyptology debate 270 Open mind 02-Apr-19 01:50
Re: Egyptology debate 240 cladking 02-Apr-19 02:25
Re: Egyptology debate 258 Open mind 02-Apr-19 03:30
Re: Egyptology debate 291 cladking 02-Apr-19 03:43
Don't you ever 243 eyeofhorus33 02-Apr-19 17:04
Re: Don't you ever 206 cladking 02-Apr-19 19:39
Re: Don't you ever 295 Martin Stower 02-Apr-19 20:23
Re: Don't you ever 220 Corpuscles 02-Apr-19 20:38
Re: Don't you ever 202 eyeofhorus33 03-Apr-19 17:27
Re: Don't you ever 189 cladking 03-Apr-19 17:46
Re: Don't you ever 211 cladking 02-Apr-19 19:45
Re: Don't you ever 202 Thanos5150 02-Apr-19 23:31
Re: Don't you ever 174 Corpuscles 03-Apr-19 01:04
Re: Don't you ever 194 cladking 03-Apr-19 01:46
Re: Don't you ever 188 Warwick 04-Apr-19 15:56
Re: Don't you ever 161 cladking 04-Apr-19 16:58
Re: Don't you ever 162 Warwick 04-Apr-19 17:07
Re: Don't you ever 186 cladking 04-Apr-19 17:29
Re: Don't you ever 180 Warwick 04-Apr-19 17:45
Re: Don't you ever 201 Merrell 07-Apr-19 08:45
Re: Don't you ever 197 cladking 07-Apr-19 12:59
Re: Don't you ever 166 Martin Stower 07-Apr-19 16:37
Re: Don't you ever 179 cladking 03-Apr-19 01:25
Re: Egyptology debate 196 Corpuscles 02-Apr-19 21:06
Egyptology Owns the Low Road. 202 cladking 02-Apr-19 21:20
Re: Egyptology debate 258 Martin Stower 02-Apr-19 22:43
Re: Egyptology debate 230 Open mind 03-Apr-19 02:59
Re: Egyptology debate 232 Martin Stower 03-Apr-19 23:27
Re: Egyptology debate 218 Open mind 03-Apr-19 02:40
Re: Egyptology debate 191 Corpuscles 03-Apr-19 21:09
Re: Egyptology debate 168 cladking 03-Apr-19 22:00
Re: Egyptology debate 184 Corpuscles 03-Apr-19 22:40
Re: Egyptology debate 242 cladking 04-Apr-19 00:23
Re: Egyptology debate 197 Corpuscles 04-Apr-19 01:03
Re: Egyptology debate..Magic and Demonology in Ancient Egypt 264 jamesglory 04-Apr-19 02:14
Re: Egyptology debate..Magic and Demonology in Ancient Egypt 188 cladking 04-Apr-19 03:06
Two quick questions: 206 eyeofhorus33 04-Apr-19 07:41
Re: Two quick questions: 180 cladking 04-Apr-19 13:36
So, there was spiritual belief 220 eyeofhorus33 04-Apr-19 19:44
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 203 Corpuscles 04-Apr-19 20:01
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 207 eyeofhorus33 04-Apr-19 20:24
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 200 cladking 04-Apr-19 21:07
Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 219 eyeofhorus33 04-Apr-19 21:11
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 192 cladking 05-Apr-19 01:44
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 222 Corpuscles 05-Apr-19 02:22
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 207 cladking 05-Apr-19 02:44
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 184 Corpuscles 05-Apr-19 08:05
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 180 cladking 05-Apr-19 19:29
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 183 Corpuscles 05-Apr-19 22:44
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 169 cladking 06-Apr-19 00:44
Re: Bat$#!t crazy (n/t) 166 Corpuscles 06-Apr-19 06:06
Some Might Pay A Shilling 192 Barbelo 06-Apr-19 06:17
Re: Some Might Pay A Shilling 194 Corpuscles 06-Apr-19 09:00
The Telephone?? 191 Warwick 05-Apr-19 07:21
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 185 Corpuscles 04-Apr-19 21:57
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 178 cladking 04-Apr-19 21:00
Re: So, there was spiritual belief 164 cladking 04-Apr-19 20:54
You are completely mad! 204 eyeofhorus33 04-Apr-19 21:09
Re: You are completely mad! 224 cladking 05-Apr-19 02:11
Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 171 eyeofhorus33 05-Apr-19 06:18
Re: Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 220 cladking 05-Apr-19 13:48
Re: Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 166 Warwick 05-Apr-19 15:59
Re: Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 158 cladking 05-Apr-19 16:29
Re: Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 151 Warwick 05-Apr-19 17:02
Re: Cladking provides more evidence of spiritual belief! 166 cladking 05-Apr-19 17:21
Re: Egyptology debate..Magic and Demonology in Ancient Egypt 267 jamesglory 04-Apr-19 08:16
Re: Egyptology debate..Magic and Demonology in Ancient Egypt 162 cladking 04-Apr-19 13:29
Re: Egyptology debate..Magic and Demonology in Ancient Egypt 179 Warwick 04-Apr-19 15:34
Re: Egyptology debate 219 Open mind 05-Apr-19 01:40
Re: Egyptology debate 183 cladking 05-Apr-19 02:22
Re: Egyptology debate 186 Warwick 05-Apr-19 07:33
Re: Egyptology debate 195 Open mind 06-Apr-19 00:48
Re: Egyptology debate 190 Corpuscles 06-Apr-19 03:43
Re: Egyptology debate 187 Open mind 06-Apr-19 22:27
Re: Egyptology debate 180 Corpuscles 07-Apr-19 07:49
Re: Egyptology debate 169 Open mind 07-Apr-19 17:29
Re: Egyptology debate 173 Open mind 07-Apr-19 17:34
Re: Egyptology debate 186 Corpuscles 08-Apr-19 06:49
Re: Egyptology debate 192 eyeofhorus33 06-Apr-19 22:14
Re: Egyptology debate 187 Thanos5150 07-Apr-19 16:37
Re: Egyptology debate 189 eyeofhorus33 08-Apr-19 06:54
Re: Egyptology debate 176 Thanos5150 08-Apr-19 16:08
Having now caught up on the thread entire... 189 Warwick 04-Apr-19 15:50
Re: Having now caught up on the thread entire... 154 cladking 04-Apr-19 17:06
Re: Having now caught up on the thread entire... 169 Warwick 04-Apr-19 17:10
Re: Having now caught up on the thread entire... 163 cladking 04-Apr-19 17:39
IOW's 172 Warwick 04-Apr-19 17:42
Re: IOW's 162 cladking 04-Apr-19 18:54
Re: IOW's 206 Martin Stower 04-Apr-19 19:26
April Fools! 181 cladking 04-Apr-19 18:58
Re: April Fools! 202 Warwick 04-Apr-19 19:35
Re: April Fools! 208 Martin Stower 04-Apr-19 19:49
Re: April Fools! 202 cladking 04-Apr-19 20:31
Re: April Fools! 188 Martin Stower 08-Apr-19 11:18
Re: April Fools! 167 cladking 08-Apr-19 13:18
Re: April Fools! 258 Martin Stower 08-Apr-19 22:06
Re: April Fools! 190 Warwick 09-Apr-19 17:04
Re: April Fools! 192 cladking 09-Apr-19 19:55
Re: April Fools! 228 cladking 08-Apr-19 13:34
Reality? 160 Warwick 08-Apr-19 17:50
Here's Another Shilling 189 Barbelo 08-Apr-19 21:08
Talking out of both sides of your mouth again! 169 eyeofhorus33 09-Apr-19 20:41
Re: Talking out of both sides of your mouth again! 186 cladking 09-Apr-19 21:21
Re: Talking out of both sides of your mouth again! 156 cladking 09-Apr-19 21:38
In summation... 158 Warwick 10-Apr-19 17:11
Re: In summation... 155 cladking 10-Apr-19 17:33
Re: In summation... 188 Warwick 10-Apr-19 17:44
Re: In summation... 179 cladking 10-Apr-19 18:55
Re: In summation... 268 Warwick 11-Apr-19 18:30
Re: In summation... 161 Hanslune 11-Apr-19 14:37
Re: April Fools! 167 cladking 09-Apr-19 21:56
Re: Having now caught up on the thread entire... 186 cladking 11-Apr-19 15:09


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.