coarvus, dude you demonstrate that you know even far less (more ignorant) than even Cladking is about the decipherment, and translation of ancient Egyptian writing and the interpretation of it.
You are merely parroting Cladking's inaccuracies
> Ok so if you didn't infer or imply anything than
> you must agree that these translations cannot
> possibly be fully translted from a book from a
> thousande years later.
The truth of it is that in the early development of the understanding of the AE language correlations with the then found extant copies of "Book of the Dead***" were made! However after 200years of further study it is not valid to suggest the translations (particularly of the hieroglyphs )are based on (particularly entirely) on that "1000 year later" style and content of such writings.
***(actually more accurately translated "The book of coming forth by day" but other translations which you could learn a little about in general here.
That one is another modern internet version of a book called an "Encycopedia"
In fact, if you read the posted brief article, rather it suggests the exact opposite.
Also love how you can't use
> that big ol brain of yours to read something with
> few misspellings and infer what I was saying. Also
> you just look like a moron when you criticize
> someones spelling on a forum or something of the
> like because that just opens you too look like a
> massive hypocritical moron when you misspell
> something(notice how eye,war,sam, and I have all
> misspelled a few words and haven't called the
> other on it)
I understand your comment regarding criticism of spelling however this:
"have difficulting stating the manying of something"
Is a tad more serious than just spelling. Note you were accusing me of being a "hypocritical moron"!
If you are just trolling then well done! Quite funny, in indicating that you "have difficulting stating the manying of something"
Further, my comments were about your choice of words "depict" I can only guess you meant "decipher"? and "infer" instead of imply (which the exact opposite to the presumably intended? otherwise renders the statement incoherent )
Also, if you'd like to draw your
> attention to the top of the screen you will notice
> that this webstie is meant to discuss
> controversies. Now either bring forward evidince
> that the book of incantations is able to
> accurately decoded every hieroglyph, or understand
> that Sam is just pointing out that a book from a
> thousand years in the future won't accurately
> depic the past.
Anyway, given that Cladking has failed or stubbornly refuses to understand , the regular criticism from many posters , perhaps you can attempt to genuinely grasp the issue .
Sam, criticises the actual translation of ancient Egyptian writing without any ability himself to decipher or translate it.
Nor, has he any clear understanding of the methodology and history of how such has progressively been validated.
Sure there are areas of contention in translation . However Sam, would not know anything about that, unless he read what an Egyptologist has openly written and said about it.
The criticises Egyptology as a whole, which without that profession he would know absolutely zero and he pretends in insane unique delusions he knows better than all (everyone).
Sam, relies entirely on the translated works of the Pyramid Texts by Egyptologists to fabricate his own fantasies. If they were not translated in the first place, reasonably accurately or close, then he would have nothing to base his guesses upon ,which he says comes to him via something called "metaphysics" . Special "metaphysics" which only he uniquely knows about.
He suggests the Pyramid texts are entirely translated and interpreted based on the Book of the Dead. There is some truth in correlation and development of concepts (particularly early on in the 19th century) but it is not the basis for the further development over two centuries of study an understanding of the language.
Then you swallow it and just parrot his inane claims.
I suspect you will continue to refuse to learn the facts because it does not suit your alien lost civilization woo beliefs.
You can either do you own research and learn and validate the facts or stay ignorant and stupid that is completely your prerogative.