Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Hi Spiros,
You wrote: which converts via the royal cubit length of 0.5236 meters t
The Amenemope Rod is questionable because it is scribed with unevenly-spaced lines of the digit subdivisions, but a supported cubit rod length none the less. Specimen #3: Turin Museum Catalog #6347: Length = 20.614 No palms, 28 digit mean length = 0.736
20.6142857142857...= 20 43/70 = 20 + 1/2 + 1/15 + 1/21 = 1443/70 inches .523602574 meter. This is not the Royal Cubit.
[www.egyptorigins.org]
Jacob
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27-Jan-19 21:29 by Sirfiroth.
You wrote: which converts via the royal cubit length of 0.5236 meters t
The Amenemope Rod is questionable because it is scribed with unevenly-spaced lines of the digit subdivisions, but a supported cubit rod length none the less. Specimen #3: Turin Museum Catalog #6347: Length = 20.614 No palms, 28 digit mean length = 0.736
20.6142857142857...= 20 43/70 = 20 + 1/2 + 1/15 + 1/21 = 1443/70 inches .523602574 meter. This is not the Royal Cubit.
[www.egyptorigins.org]
Jacob
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27-Jan-19 21:29 by Sirfiroth.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.