Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SC: As far as I'm aware, yes.
Well done. I think that you have presented a good case for "a unified plan" at Giza.
However, if it is to be read as a "clock", it seems to me that you interpret it wrong. Where one theoretical line (a line from the Sphinx to the G2 apex) intersects another theoretical line (the Lenher-Goedicke Line), marks the date? When there are so many non-theoretical objects on the tableau that can serve as markers?
Could your "inter-quarter lines" serve more as builders instructions/aids, and the implied circle as the "clock"?
Morten
-------------------------------------------------------
> SC: As far as I'm aware, yes.
Well done. I think that you have presented a good case for "a unified plan" at Giza.
However, if it is to be read as a "clock", it seems to me that you interpret it wrong. Where one theoretical line (a line from the Sphinx to the G2 apex) intersects another theoretical line (the Lenher-Goedicke Line), marks the date? When there are so many non-theoretical objects on the tableau that can serve as markers?
Could your "inter-quarter lines" serve more as builders instructions/aids, and the implied circle as the "clock"?
Morten
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.