Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Two further questions, Avry
In your opinion, and independently of all other considerations, do you find a 179-foot error to be outside the realm of archeological persuasion, that the AEs intended the belt star alignment?
How about your 43-footer?
As for the first, I would now say no. However, when we take into account proportion, juxtaposition and all, I remain a firm yes.
In your opinion, and independently of all other considerations, do you find a 179-foot error to be outside the realm of archeological persuasion, that the AEs intended the belt star alignment?
How about your 43-footer?
As for the first, I would now say no. However, when we take into account proportion, juxtaposition and all, I remain a firm yes.
Namaste
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.