Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Duketown Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > huh?
> > Are you trying to explain how Champillion
> attached
> > a sound to Greco characters? Please use
> > human-understandable sentences. We are not
> > translating glyphs. We are talking reason.
>
> Correction: I am talking reason. You are talking
> fluent halfwit.
>
> I write for the intelligent, not halfwits.
>
> M.
ok, the good part is I don't need to understand you to explain both the intelligent and the halfwits that you're wrong.
I don't know how Charlatan converted those signs to sounds. Clearly, that linguistic wonder has all credits but probably he used a local to read aloud. My guess, that Arab had a speech problem or Champillion had a vivid imagination. And just at the moment they arrived at the /s/, the Arab sneezed and Charlatan clearly understood that those Egyptian destroyed jeruzalem.
Either way: you arguing the differences between sounds and characters, while you again fail to recognize that doesn't make a difference. The mapping is there and speaks for itself.
But the problem is that you don't know this: you produce garbage text without understanding why.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01-Dec-18 20:45 by Duketown.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Duketown Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > huh?
> > Are you trying to explain how Champillion
> attached
> > a sound to Greco characters? Please use
> > human-understandable sentences. We are not
> > translating glyphs. We are talking reason.
>
> Correction: I am talking reason. You are talking
> fluent halfwit.
>
> I write for the intelligent, not halfwits.
>
> M.
ok, the good part is I don't need to understand you to explain both the intelligent and the halfwits that you're wrong.
I don't know how Charlatan converted those signs to sounds. Clearly, that linguistic wonder has all credits but probably he used a local to read aloud. My guess, that Arab had a speech problem or Champillion had a vivid imagination. And just at the moment they arrived at the /s/, the Arab sneezed and Charlatan clearly understood that those Egyptian destroyed jeruzalem.
Either way: you arguing the differences between sounds and characters, while you again fail to recognize that doesn't make a difference. The mapping is there and speaks for itself.
But the problem is that you don't know this: you produce garbage text without understanding why.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01-Dec-18 20:45 by Duketown.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.