Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Duketown Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Nope.
> >
> > Loprieno says of Ancient Egyptian that “its
> > morphological repertoire differs to a great extent
> > from that of Semitic and of other Afroasiatic
> > languages”. This may in part explain his
> > treating it as sui generis.
> >
> > The book is full of detail and to understand it
> > takes nontrivial knowledge of (a) linguistics and
> > (b) Egyptology. I doubt you understand what
> > I’ve just quoted.
> >
> > M.
>
>
> I don't want to understand such nonsense; that's
> for egyptologist. . . .





















This is linguistics jargon, not Egyptology.
While you have declared yourself a “don’t know, don’t want to know”.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Nope.
> >
> > Loprieno says of Ancient Egyptian that “its
> > morphological repertoire differs to a great extent
> > from that of Semitic and of other Afroasiatic
> > languages”. This may in part explain his
> > treating it as sui generis.
> >
> > The book is full of detail and to understand it
> > takes nontrivial knowledge of (a) linguistics and
> > (b) Egyptology. I doubt you understand what
> > I’ve just quoted.
> >
> > M.
>
>
> I don't want to understand such nonsense; that's
> for egyptologist. . . .






















This is linguistics jargon, not Egyptology.
While you have declared yourself a “don’t know, don’t want to know”.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.