Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you want to prove it you must have a process to
> go from symbol to meaning. You disagree with the
> process discovered by 180 years of studies and I
> have absolutely no problem with it and I wish you
> good luck with your quest.

(again) Correction Manu..
If you (= cladking) want to prove it (= alternative translation theory) you must have a process to go from symbol to meaning with coherent and reproducible results. This last part you purposefully forget because you don't apply the scientific method. Since you can't explain the rationale, you only repeat word-lists with an added repertoire of tools to bent interpretation in the direction of your masters' imagination.

Besides and more importantly, you forget to mention there is a process from sound to symbol underlying your statement. Your topic title (From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound) by itself shows your lacking understanding of interpreting ancient languages. That symbol you start with, is the representation of underlying sounds which represents the language and it's meaning. That's why you don't understand my remarks about your fake fixed points. You don't understand were translating starts. You start somewhere in the middle. You believe this is a fixed point but it isn't: Sound is the LANGUAGE; not your broken interpretation of those symbols.


See addendum with some updates that happened by trail-and-error. Note that Champillion's reasoning is also MIA. permanent link


Current interpretation of glyphs isn't perfect and Champillion reference of thinking (culture, religion, knowledge, experience etc) ofc influenced his choices in grouping those symbols into single letters belonging to the Greco alphabet. He learned those magnificent skills, like fluently reading foreign languages, on religious schools, paid for by his crusading government. This didn't contribute to this man's open mind.
To be more specific: Those 19th century egyptologists laid the foundation of your believes and those crusaders were god-fearing and believing in slavery at the same time.
In other words: they had broken worldviews and still, you don't have the rationale to elevate yourself to sanity. You are required to have a rationale, since language is an expression of reason. Yet, you have the arrogance judging other men's interpretations.
`
To bring egyptologist back into sanity, it's time for them to understand that they can't make any linguistic claims without explaining the rationale of why a certain sound represents a certain letter; ancient languages can be reasoned otherwise it's "no language without a message".
You cannot solve half a puzzle and claim to have a proven rationale while most of it's results are incoherent. In reality, the proof only leads to one conclusion: Champillion didn't understand the sounds; he was really eager to prove Egyptians destroyed Jerusalem and he first wrote down a story about Egyptian religion, BEFORE he even could decipher the description of the mummy of Bakt-en-Hor.

You fail to prove your own rationale. You refer to 180 years of Egyptology as some proof but those 180 years delivered sub-optimal results. A provable reason you, and thus 180 years of study, fail, is that you are working from a wrong base: you can't fuse multiple sounds without losing meaning.
If you don't understand: try to articulate /t/ and /d/ and understand those letters are almost opposite in articulation, yet that Charlatan fused them. I need to know why!
The underlying sounds still aren't understood, only improved by trail-and-error and not deducted with reasoning. And even with an added repertoire of tools, egyptologist still delivers results that are sub-optimal at best.

Look Manu, your interpretation follow the same style of reasoning as you display on this forum: drenched with assumption. If you want to judge Cladking, prove your own rationale. Why do you continue this insanity? I already explained this 20 times. While you ignored 18 of them, the 2 times you tried to explain yourself, you only proved you have a broken method, derived from a broken worldview.


Are you really sure that "kwak" has the same meaning as "kwik"? And how come "kwek" became "kwak"? Why fuse 3 ducks into 1? They are 3 individuals; not 1. I don't believe "kwek" and "kwik" are happy becoming "kwak".


Important note:
Linguists (i.e. Loprieno) classifying these non-languages is also unscientific. They should understand that it's the glyph sound itself that represents language; not the imaginary interpretation of egyptologists. Whether linguists call it abracadabra or Semitic, the sounds remain the same. Treating it as a language-isolate doesn't justify their unscientific reasoning. Believing that Champillion's interpretation is more important than the meaning of the sound that glyph represents is insane. All Egyptologists are charlatans or unscientific disciples and that include the linguists who doesn't care to explain their fundamental rational. I will gladly retract this statement: Proof that there is no meaning lost when sounds where mapped to letters.

Language isolates also need justification. You can not even classify something as a language if you can't explain what the sounds mean. That's why birds tsjilp instead of speaking. Clearly, Egyptologists treat that what they can't understand as a language. I already explained extensively that means we need to have a rationale. Sure, any sane egyptologist or linguist recognize this but they can't explain beyond Charlatan. They believe they don't have to but science knows they do.

As it stands now: The glyphs Egyptologists and linguists are trying to interpret can't even classify as language. A language is a fixed set of coherent definitions. The dynamics egyptologists use, is what is wrong with the translation system. And it starts with fusing sounds since this causes loss of meaning.
Egyptologists compensate this with flexibility to mix and match interpretations, resulting in incoherent meaning. The base egyptologists working from is wrong. The incoherence I mean isn't the incoherence resulting from wider interpretation of glyphs; I mean incoherence due to broken phonogrammatic system, with incoherent rules, and a translation system which include a repertoire of tools to bent interpretation in any direction, etc.

Why this post?
Egyptologists can't deny the problems around the phonogrammatic system that I showed Manu. You can't claim to understand without even having a rationale. You can't demand prove without proving yourself.
I think it's time that egyptologists stop keeping humanity disconnected from their roots. They have no scientific base and need to give room to so-called alternative researchers. In reality, the alternative researcher are the real researchers and the egyptologists are the pseudo-scientists. Working from an unscientific base has huge implication for scientific debate, patronizing alternative researchers. I know I use of harsh words but I think the best describe what's the case. Someone only had to spell this out.

I like to compare egyptologist to a mechanic with 2.000 tools, only to deliver a broken car. Instead of reconsidering their skill set, they buy more tools to only add to the confusion without fixing the car.

I hope this post will help to make sure Egyptologists and linguists become scientific and it's their burden to prove their rationale. As it stands now, the alternative researcher has all reason to speculate while egyptologist are in no position to judge. An open mind is needed. Just accept the fact we don't know and don't become like religion or science.

I proved information is lost and explained there is no rationale using the scientific method. Both statement are scientific 100% correct but this isn't reflected in current day reality. You can not argue with science and yet Egyptologists and linguists know better. You can not hide behind broken assumptions.

Addendum:
trail-and-error updates to Champillion's list: (but rationale for phonogrammatic system is still missing)

The Omega assignment is false. standard transliteration that is a "w" sound not a "o"
The seat is "p" not "phi"
Only the first two symbols are correctly pronounced "S". The next three symbols are "z"
Rho is only the mouth symbol
The Lion is "rw" in Old Egyptian see the very text I posted for a tandem of it
"l" in Late Egyptain as per Ptolemis
The next one up is correct. That's p and comes from Ptolemy as well
Ditto the sling
The next one looks like "ks" and "kz" , but the sound in Greek is more like "kh" if that's supposed to be an X
The wavy line is n, but the jar is nw
M looks correct
The lion in late Egyptian is "l" looks good. The flower symbol looks like a lotus, but not sure.
Kappa is correct for the first four symbols, the rest are wrong
I and H look ok for the dual reed but the arm symbol is wrong. This also came from Ptolemis
J (Greek epsilon) is ok for the single reed
D and T are not delta, only d
Gamma is wrong. Neither symbol sounds like a g
The leg is ok for b, not the other two symbols as far as I can make them out.
The first row is the worst. The best match for a Greek A is the arm. All the others are wrong from the looks of it.
They are "d", "t", and the word "dj" which is not a letter.
The reason why Champollion converged them into Greek "t" is that this was the version on the stone he could read. I can assure you that no egyptologist, heck no tourist learning glyphs in Cairo, would read a "rdj" as "t". "rdj" means to give. It's a verb, not a letter.

Extra:
A nice quote from forum member and Semitic tongue expert & egyptologist Martin Stower
> > To labour the obvious, the difference between /t/
> > and /d/ and /s/ and /z/ is voicing. Otherwise
> > same point of articulation, so it could be
> > difficult in the early stages to differentiate
> > sounds with this much in common.

Say what? Just one of countless example of incompetence of Martin Stower. People like him are the reason I took the time to make my point.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 1537 Manu 29-Nov-18 18:48
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 325 Duketown 29-Nov-18 18:59
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 297 Manu 29-Nov-18 19:33
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 222 Duketown 29-Nov-18 19:40
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 222 Manu 29-Nov-18 20:08
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 236 Duketown 29-Nov-18 20:23
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 241 Manu 29-Nov-18 20:54
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 293 Martin Stower 29-Nov-18 20:59
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 215 Manu 29-Nov-18 21:07
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 214 Duketown 29-Nov-18 21:16
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 270 Martin Stower 29-Nov-18 21:20
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 218 Manu 29-Nov-18 21:37
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 211 Duketown 29-Nov-18 22:46
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 201 Manu 29-Nov-18 23:02
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 207 Duketown 29-Nov-18 23:18
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 245 cladking 29-Nov-18 23:32
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 252 Duketown 29-Nov-18 23:39
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 234 cladking 30-Nov-18 00:51
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 220 Duketown 30-Nov-18 01:13
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 227 cladking 30-Nov-18 02:27
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 245 Manu 29-Nov-18 23:47
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 190 Duketown 30-Nov-18 00:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 230 Manu 30-Nov-18 00:21
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 190 Duketown 30-Nov-18 00:50
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 191 cladking 29-Nov-18 22:54
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 199 Manu 29-Nov-18 23:29
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 186 cladking 30-Nov-18 00:26
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 195 Manu 30-Nov-18 00:46
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 195 cladking 30-Nov-18 00:55
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 243 Duketown 30-Nov-18 01:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 185 cladking 04-Dec-18 15:38
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 194 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 15:49
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 191 cladking 04-Dec-18 16:40
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 187 cladking 04-Dec-18 16:45
Who are these "researchers"? 195 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-18 18:09
Re: Who are these "researchers"? 223 MDaines 04-Dec-18 18:40
Re: Who are these "researchers"? 201 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-18 19:35
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 205 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 18:21
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 155 cladking 04-Dec-18 20:23
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 192 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 22:07
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 160 cladking 04-Dec-18 22:25
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 180 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 22:38
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 181 cladking 04-Dec-18 23:08
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 191 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 23:50
And the Great Irony 189 cladking 04-Dec-18 20:32
Re: And the Great Irony 191 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 22:12
More Great Irony 152 cladking 04-Dec-18 22:15
Re: More Great Irony 193 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 22:24
And the tiny little Irony 179 cladking 04-Dec-18 22:32
Re: And the tiny little Irony 189 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 22:47
Re: And the tiny little Irony 171 cladking 04-Dec-18 23:05
Re: And the tiny little Irony 190 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 23:22
Re: And the tiny little Irony 180 cladking 05-Dec-18 01:15
Re: And the tiny little Irony 218 Martin Stower 05-Dec-18 01:34
Re: And the tiny little Irony 203 Corpuscles 05-Dec-18 19:31
Re: And the tiny little Irony 181 Warwick 05-Dec-18 20:31
Re: And the tiny little Irony 185 Martin Stower 06-Dec-18 20:12
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 185 cladking 29-Nov-18 20:33
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 212 Manu 29-Nov-18 20:56
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 179 cladking 29-Nov-18 22:26
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 212 Manu 29-Nov-18 22:41
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 197 cladking 29-Nov-18 23:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 205 Duketown 29-Nov-18 23:35
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 195 cladking 30-Nov-18 04:04
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 217 Manu 29-Nov-18 23:44
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 180 cladking 30-Nov-18 03:47
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 308 Manu 30-Nov-18 05:53
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 216 cladking 01-Dec-18 14:32
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 282 Manu 01-Dec-18 15:08
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 253 cladking 01-Dec-18 15:24
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 271 Manu 01-Dec-18 17:03
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 184 cladking 04-Dec-18 20:46
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 181 Warwick 04-Dec-18 21:10
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 156 cladking 04-Dec-18 21:47
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 185 Warwick 05-Dec-18 15:01
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 196 Martin Stower 05-Dec-18 18:23
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 208 cladking 05-Dec-18 22:47
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 195 Martin Stower 06-Dec-18 00:44
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 202 cladking 06-Dec-18 01:01
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 164 Warwick 06-Dec-18 18:44
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 181 cladking 06-Dec-18 19:16
Well then... 187 Warwick 06-Dec-18 17:00
Re: Well then... 188 cladking 06-Dec-18 18:56
Re: Well then... 185 Warwick 06-Dec-18 21:14
Re: Well then... 235 cladking 06-Dec-18 21:57
In conclusion..... 257 Warwick 10-Dec-18 19:11
Re: In conclusion..... 214 cladking 10-Dec-18 20:19
Re: In conclusion..... 199 Martin Stower 10-Dec-18 23:23
Re: In conclusion..... 193 cladking 11-Dec-18 01:35
Re: In conclusion..... 236 Martin Stower 11-Dec-18 12:14
Re: In conclusion..... 272 Warwick 11-Dec-18 19:32
Re: In conclusion..... 293 Warwick 13-Dec-18 18:45
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 195 Thanos5150 04-Dec-18 23:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 177 Warwick 05-Dec-18 14:58
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 211 Martin Stower 29-Nov-18 20:55
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 220 Duketown 30-Nov-18 15:32
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 208 Martin Stower 30-Nov-18 23:17
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 196 Duketown 30-Nov-18 22:18
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 197 Duketown 30-Nov-18 01:42
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 333 Manu 30-Nov-18 20:42
Crash Course 246 Manu 03-Dec-18 06:43
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 203 Duketown 01-Dec-18 00:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 251 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 00:41
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 238 Duketown 01-Dec-18 00:49
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 238 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 01:06
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 197 Duketown 01-Dec-18 01:09
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 276 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 01:18
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 243 Duketown 01-Dec-18 01:30
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 274 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 01:56
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 247 Duketown 01-Dec-18 02:16
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 369 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 09:46
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 248 Duketown 01-Dec-18 13:56
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 271 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 14:47
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 236 Duketown 01-Dec-18 15:24
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 234 Martin Stower 01-Dec-18 15:50
Where are the sane egyptologist? 228 Duketown 02-Dec-18 21:12
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 206 Duketown 02-Dec-18 21:13
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 186 cladking 02-Dec-18 23:08
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 218 Duketown 02-Dec-18 23:22
Corpus Cladking 189 Barbelo 03-Dec-18 02:07
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 218 cladking 03-Dec-18 02:47
Thankfully It's Not Contagious 210 Barbelo 03-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 250 Duketown 03-Dec-18 04:58
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 182 Barbelo 03-Dec-18 23:58
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 204 Duketown 04-Dec-18 00:56
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 190 Barbelo 04-Dec-18 02:04
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 250 Duketown 04-Dec-18 02:16
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 209 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 20:07
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 179 Barbelo 04-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 207 Martin Stower 04-Dec-18 13:25
Re: Thankfully It's Not Contagious 201 Martin Stower 03-Dec-18 11:09
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 246 Martin Stower 02-Dec-18 23:31
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 227 Duketown 02-Dec-18 23:41
Re: Where are the sane egyptologist? 232 Duketown 03-Dec-18 00:15
Mod Caution > Ad Hominem Posts – General 221 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Dec-18 23:45
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 186 Duketown 03-Dec-18 04:56
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 199 atul.seth 03-Dec-18 06:42
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 267 Manu 03-Dec-18 15:59
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 203 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Dec-18 18:38
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 198 atul.seth 04-Dec-18 13:44
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 177 cladking 04-Dec-18 14:59
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 239 Duketown 03-Dec-18 07:06
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 215 atul.seth 03-Dec-18 14:42
Egyptology is insane! 294 Duketown 03-Dec-18 04:39
Re: Egyptology is insane! 229 Duketown 03-Dec-18 10:15
Re: Egyptology is insane! 185 D-Archer 03-Dec-18 14:50
Mod Note > Topic Moved 179 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Dec-18 16:33
Mod Note > Duplicate Topic Merged 202 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Dec-18 17:37
Re: Egyptology is insane! 287 Martin Stower 03-Dec-18 17:57
Re: Egyptology is insane! 249 D-Archer 07-Dec-18 11:24
Re: Egyptology is insane! 252 Martin Stower 07-Dec-18 15:48
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 214 Duketown 03-Dec-18 17:36
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 225 Duketown 03-Dec-18 17:50
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 238 Martin Stower 03-Dec-18 22:04
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 225 Duketown 03-Dec-18 19:15
Re: From Ancient Symbol to Modern Sound 216 Duketown 03-Dec-18 21:08
Mod Warning > Ad Hominem Posts – General 230 Dr. Troglodyte 06-Dec-18 17:23


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.