> Thanks for the plans will take a little time
> looking them over.
> Re Woodhenge Would you say the ameter is 144.375
> imp feet / or just close? Have you looked and
> diameters of inner circles??
> Use 22/7 and again use yards nice move that.
I think it would be more accurate to call them ellipsoids, below is the best i can do with Google Earth's ruler, ive measured from the center of these concrete blocks, most seem about 18" in diameter so you could add 36" on the overall outer measure if that was their measured intention, or inversely reduce the same amount if the inner measure was their intention.
Woodhenge has a similar dating to Stonehenge , so the second image below is showing another significant set of numbers that say there was some sort of measured connection between the two sites.
On the perculia ellipsoid shape of these concentric circles, you have to come to the conclusion there was intention in their placing, it would have been much easy'er to construct a proper circle by just letting out a length of rope from the center for each individual circle, so this does imply some sort of information being imparted via the shape, could it be the ratio of Earth's perceived orbital path around the Sun between Aphelion and Perihelion .
Could it be the the Moons periodic motions, as its interesting that the outer path around the stones comes to 147.66 yards, and 147.66 / 5 = 29.532 wich is very close to our modern exact determination of 29.5305089 days for the Moons Synodic period.
So who knows, one can speculate till the proverbial cows come home, but its fun doing it, who knows maybe one day someone will Find Proof that these ancient guys did what im suggesting they did.
The Connection between Stonehenge and Woodhenge.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 16-Dec-18 20:18 by DUNE.