Hanslune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I love how "believers" can just ignore facts,
> reason and argument and fall back on the belief
> that they know everything there is to know.
>
> Cladking you've used this same strawman hundreds
> of times - NO one in science has that belief,
> 'that we know everything there is to know', so why
> do you constantly tell that lie? It makes you look
> absolutely childish.

So what is causing that thermal anomaly, why don't you even care, and why didn't Egyptologists predict it or even come up with an hypothesis as to its cause? Why has Hawass said he knows everything about Giza and they took nearly a century to use infrared imaging? Why have they never systematically employed human knowledge and science to studying any great pyramid. These are ALL hallmarks of people who know everything.

You call it a strawman and I call it simple observation. They are afraid of the pyramid and they are afraid their own beliefs will be shown to be hollow and counterproductive just like all beliefs as expressed in concepts like; "we believe the pyramids were tombs and "neter" meant "god". Just like they can't comment on the simple fact that the language lacked words for belief, cognition, and taxonomies. Just like they are blind to the simple fact that the language of the ancients broke Zipf's Law. They can only see what they believe just like you and me.

> Nope your idea is skewed I don't believe
> you.....the problem isn't other people...

[sigh]

The problem is the way we think using modern language.

We can't imagine another way to think. "I think therefore I am, and it follows my dog isn't real".

> There is no 'status quo', ...

Really!!!?!!!

> ....and this is your standard way to change the
> subject away from the failures of your own idea.

And yet you do not address any subject even after you change it repeatedly. Why were there no words of superstition?

> However good news you are pretty much ignored
> these day - success!!.

If Egyptology ever abandons the low road I'm just leaving a trail of bread crumbs so they can find me.

> I find deep comedic value in your prancing about
> saying things you don't even understand and your
> pompous stand that you are doing something useful.
> Your not.

Of course I don't understand. It seems I'm one of a few who don't know everything.

It will be decades coming to really understand Ancient Language and more decades to grasp ancient science. It will require the efforts of individuals far smarter and more capable than I.


> > The pyramid stands in all its glory
> > despite its ruined condition and represents the
> > fact that the beliefs and superstitions that
> > guide
> > the modern world are deadly.

> That's weird and makes no sense - classic Cladking
> logic.

All belief is wrong. Belief can represent reality but it is wrong to assume that it does. One can only say that based on current evidence a belief might be justified, ie- it might reflect reality. This hardly means everything based on this belief is equally true or equally reflective of reality. It does not mean that anyone who disagrees is wackadoodle.

> It about reality and why your 'ideas' are junk.

Yet, I can't remember you ever once responding on point. You believe all you need to do is tell me your beliefs and this should be sufficient to change my mind. You want to save souls through showing the way.

Save the alts by laying down the truth. You're not only wrong about how you argue but this thread is prima facie evidence that your "truth" is wrong as well and you haven't said one single thing to show otherwise. Insults and irrelevancies do not constitute truth or lead to undermining someone else's argument. You are stuck on the low road with Egyptology. Hear no evil, speak no evil, and see no evil while berating and insulting those who disagree. When this fails you try to ignore them. Good luck with that too.