Hanslune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah dude the PT is full of Gods - remember we are
> not obligated to believe your nonsense that those
> words mean other things - just because you say
> so...lol

Then you'll never understand ANY of my arguments because it's not I who say the gods were theory, it was the great pyramid builders themselves.

You'll never be able to entertain this idea because you refuse to see past what you believe.

But if you can be intellectually honest you can still see the proof which is that they lacked the tens of thousands of words of superstition, cognition, and taxonomies. You can still see that there is a literal meaning to most of their words and this literal meaning is being ignored.

> Tell me about what the Abusir Papyrus and the
> Palermo Stone say I mean you also claim to answer
> all questions.....

I've answered these questions ad infinitum. ALL the evidence including physical evidence, textual evidence, and historical evidence fits.

I don't care if you don't like it.


> ...lets see your
> research which proves what you claim?

Where is the actual experiment that proves ANY SINGLE ONE of the et als to be correct? Where is the evidence that underlies Egyptology? Where is the evidence that the Great Pyramid is a tomb built by changeless superstitious bumpkins who dragged them up ramps? In this thread I have proven they were not superstitious and in this I've shown they were actually thedead king;

[grahamhancock.com]

In other threads I have shown their science and how it worked and why we don't see it.

[grahamhancock.com]

In my thousands of posts there are countless explanations of how Egyptology made its errors and bad assumptions.

> Why are you hiding from providing evidence to
> support your claim?

You have the confused notion that Egyptology is correct until someone proves otherwise. Indeed, it's even worse that this because you believe they are correct until they change. In other words one day reality simply changes to something else. There is only one single reality and 7,000,000,000 different interpretations. You don't understand this so you look to peers to tell you what's real and what's not just as people used to seek out priests.

You may be on the right side of history but history changes. You'll be left high and dry when it does. And since you're young there's really no doubt you'll have the opportunity to be hung out to dry.

The opinion of peers and et als is not evidence. What I'm presenting is evidence of a different perspective to see what might be reality. An argument is facts and logic and you seem capable of understanding neither.

Why do you never respond on point? You only seek a few keywords to level your insults and -snip- the facts and logic. Then you tell me that my opinion means nothing, and Egyptological opinion is your reality.

Good luck with this.

Ironically enough progress leaves even peers in the dust so reality for "believers" doesn't so much change as it must evolve. Most people go to their graves with the exact same beliefs they learned on their parents' knees. People don't need no stinkin' facts and logic because their minds were made up long ago.