Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > That said, based on the responses so far, I
> > wouldn't be surprised if there are lurkers not
> > posting out of fear of being called an "idiot" or
> > "oblivious" or some other ad hominem, and so it's
> > better to just avoid posting from the start.
>
> You are so dishonest it never ceases to amaze. Its
> ok for T-Bird to question my integrity and
> question if I am a sycophant or propagandist for
> no reason whatsoever other than he does not like
> what I am saying, though he doesn't even
> understand why, yet me calling him an idiot is why
> people would be afraid to post. Why aren't you
> bitching and crying about T-Bird's comment
> Origyptian? And as far as being "oblivious" goes-
> you prove yet again why it is an apt description
> for some. Oh, "Thanos called me dishonest-see"?
> Save it.
>
> Cue Origyptian saying the exact opposite in
> 3...2...1
"Dishonest". You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
You call me 'pedantic' for correcting another poster's calculation, but you don't consider that poster to be at least as pedantic for introducing the calculation in the first place. And yet I'm the dishonest one.
For whatever reason, when you take the gloves off it gets ugly, real fast, and I think that's partly because you're one of the smarter alphas here but you can't tolerate disagreement. For one thing, I wouldn't be driven to call someone "dead" or "dishonest" or an "idiot" as an equivalency to them calling me a "sycophant" (flattery for gain). Of course T'bird lost it in that post, but it seems like you just keep going on and on.
I don't understand why the alpha can't let the peanut gallery be. We all know the specs - giants, a few ethnic issues, "spectral" imagination and verbal acumen (which I mean as a very strong compliment, by the way, T'bird), non-threatening venting.
Why don't you use your skills of erudition to debate instead of your glands?
And I didn't particularly appreciate your quips directed at me, either.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13-Apr-18 12:27 by Origyptian.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > That said, based on the responses so far, I
> > wouldn't be surprised if there are lurkers not
> > posting out of fear of being called an "idiot" or
> > "oblivious" or some other ad hominem, and so it's
> > better to just avoid posting from the start.
>
> You are so dishonest it never ceases to amaze. Its
> ok for T-Bird to question my integrity and
> question if I am a sycophant or propagandist for
> no reason whatsoever other than he does not like
> what I am saying, though he doesn't even
> understand why, yet me calling him an idiot is why
> people would be afraid to post. Why aren't you
> bitching and crying about T-Bird's comment
> Origyptian? And as far as being "oblivious" goes-
> you prove yet again why it is an apt description
> for some. Oh, "Thanos called me dishonest-see"?
> Save it.
>
> Cue Origyptian saying the exact opposite in
> 3...2...1
"Dishonest". You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
You call me 'pedantic' for correcting another poster's calculation, but you don't consider that poster to be at least as pedantic for introducing the calculation in the first place. And yet I'm the dishonest one.
For whatever reason, when you take the gloves off it gets ugly, real fast, and I think that's partly because you're one of the smarter alphas here but you can't tolerate disagreement. For one thing, I wouldn't be driven to call someone "dead" or "dishonest" or an "idiot" as an equivalency to them calling me a "sycophant" (flattery for gain). Of course T'bird lost it in that post, but it seems like you just keep going on and on.
I don't understand why the alpha can't let the peanut gallery be. We all know the specs - giants, a few ethnic issues, "spectral" imagination and verbal acumen (which I mean as a very strong compliment, by the way, T'bird), non-threatening venting.
Why don't you use your skills of erudition to debate instead of your glands?
And I didn't particularly appreciate your quips directed at me, either.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13-Apr-18 12:27 by Origyptian.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.