Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
I prepared my comment in advance:
‘A very large part of the problem with Creighton is his wildly premature rush to prescriptive judgement—this through his having no real interest in the topic, other than its serving his rancid “forgery” agenda.’
https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/315607-merers-logbook-a-question/#comment-6367096
The value of your observations is entirely vitiated by the agenda running through everything you do like “Blackpool” through a stick of rock.
So, go on, take the (logically unwarranted) inductive step and then the (logically unwarranted) next step from a descriptive generalisation to a prescriptive rule—from being led by the data to laying down the law for the data. You will of course fail to understand that your procedure is malformed at a much deeper level than that of Egyptology.
M.
‘A very large part of the problem with Creighton is his wildly premature rush to prescriptive judgement—this through his having no real interest in the topic, other than its serving his rancid “forgery” agenda.’
https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/315607-merers-logbook-a-question/#comment-6367096
The value of your observations is entirely vitiated by the agenda running through everything you do like “Blackpool” through a stick of rock.
So, go on, take the (logically unwarranted) inductive step and then the (logically unwarranted) next step from a descriptive generalisation to a prescriptive rule—from being led by the data to laying down the law for the data. You will of course fail to understand that your procedure is malformed at a much deeper level than that of Egyptology.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.