Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For your clarity, THIS is what the discussion is
> about:



> As presented here by Stower.
>
> As you can see it is STOWER who is insisting the
> 'u' signs from the roof blocks of Campbell's
> Chamber are to be rotated onto their sides and
> thus read as a viable number.

Excuse me? I’m “insisting” on no such thing.

I’m taking the numerals as presented by Rowe: relative to the nfr and w3s. I’m rotating nothing. A literate ancient Egyptian could read them as they are. I can read them as they are. It’s not rocket science.

> MY argument is . . .

. . . tedious.

M.