Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For your clarity, THIS is what the discussion is
> about:
> As presented here by Stower.
>
> As you can see it is STOWER who is insisting the
> 'u' signs from the roof blocks of Campbell's
> Chamber are to be rotated onto their sides and
> thus read as a viable number.
Excuse me? I’m “insisting” on no such thing.
I’m taking the numerals as presented by Rowe: relative to the nfr and w3s. I’m rotating nothing. A literate ancient Egyptian could read them as they are. I can read them as they are. It’s not rocket science.
> MY argument is . . .
. . . tedious.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> For your clarity, THIS is what the discussion is
> about:

> As presented here by Stower.
>
> As you can see it is STOWER who is insisting the
> 'u' signs from the roof blocks of Campbell's
> Chamber are to be rotated onto their sides and
> thus read as a viable number.
Excuse me? I’m “insisting” on no such thing.
I’m taking the numerals as presented by Rowe: relative to the nfr and w3s. I’m rotating nothing. A literate ancient Egyptian could read them as they are. I can read them as they are. It’s not rocket science.
> MY argument is . . .
. . . tedious.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.