Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scott Creighton Wrote:
> ------------------------------------- at the end
> of the Queens' Chamber southern
> > shaft, the number '20' written using what is
> > believed to be a completely different hieratic
> > sign i.e. not 'nn'? And why isn't it written
> > sideways?
>
> Because what is written there is not the number
> 20. This was already explained to you.
>
> Besides, you seem to think having an opinion makes
> the opinion true by virtue of it having been
> expressed.
>
> It is my opinion I can stand on the surface of the
> sun without being harmed in any way.
>
> It is my opinion I can travel faster than the
> speed of light.
>
> And so on.
>
> Your opinion has been weighed and measured and
> found wanting.
>
> I could also point out the orientation of the
> numerals to the signs may not be relative at all,
> ie not written at the same time. One guy marks
> nefer, another comes along later and writes a
> number. This creates doubt in knowing the truth
> (barring 4500 year old video) of how they were
> written, and such doubt sinks any opinion you
> might have showing any sign of validity.
4500 year old video won't work either. the date overlay in the bottom corner would be written in the same glyphs that aren't clear enough for some.
Warwick
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scott Creighton Wrote:
> ------------------------------------- at the end
> of the Queens' Chamber southern
> > shaft, the number '20' written using what is
> > believed to be a completely different hieratic
> > sign i.e. not 'nn'? And why isn't it written
> > sideways?
>
> Because what is written there is not the number
> 20. This was already explained to you.
>
> Besides, you seem to think having an opinion makes
> the opinion true by virtue of it having been
> expressed.
>
> It is my opinion I can stand on the surface of the
> sun without being harmed in any way.
>
> It is my opinion I can travel faster than the
> speed of light.
>
> And so on.
>
> Your opinion has been weighed and measured and
> found wanting.
>
> I could also point out the orientation of the
> numerals to the signs may not be relative at all,
> ie not written at the same time. One guy marks
> nefer, another comes along later and writes a
> number. This creates doubt in knowing the truth
> (barring 4500 year old video) of how they were
> written, and such doubt sinks any opinion you
> might have showing any sign of validity.
4500 year old video won't work either. the date overlay in the bottom corner would be written in the same glyphs that aren't clear enough for some.
Warwick
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.