Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can you present a hieratic example of the ordinal
> 'eleventh', 'twelth' etc, where the hieratic ten
> sign ('n') has been rotated sideways along with
> the units? It's not clear from Gardiner's comments
> if he is referring still only to unit values being
> on their side.
>
> One example will do
Will do for what? To explode your spurious argument? That’s been done already.
Just because this is your last resort, doesn’t oblige me to dance to your tune. Burden is on you (as it has been all along) to show that there is anything wrong with the numerals. That rotated numerals are normal has been established. Gardiner’s “etc.” makes it perfectly clear that it goes up to “eleventh” and beyond.
You really want to see
in the context of an ordinal? Try here:
It’s a perfectly good example. So are these:
is V20h, by the way—predefined and not rotated by me.
Go on, tell us that your arbitrary stipulations are not an attempt to load the dice and make them come up “forgery”.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can you present a hieratic example of the ordinal
> 'eleventh', 'twelth' etc, where the hieratic ten
> sign ('n') has been rotated sideways along with
> the units? It's not clear from Gardiner's comments
> if he is referring still only to unit values being
> on their side.
>
> One example will do
Will do for what? To explode your spurious argument? That’s been done already.
Just because this is your last resort, doesn’t oblige me to dance to your tune. Burden is on you (as it has been all along) to show that there is anything wrong with the numerals. That rotated numerals are normal has been established. Gardiner’s “etc.” makes it perfectly clear that it goes up to “eleventh” and beyond.
You really want to see


It’s a perfectly good example. So are these:


Go on, tell us that your arbitrary stipulations are not an attempt to load the dice and make them come up “forgery”.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.