No he is not wrong because you say so - you
> have to publish a paper that clearly outlines that
> their theory is wrong - you cannot just state your
> opinion and expect it to be believed. Will you
> publish that? NOPE
> And the only et als I can quote are long dead
> physicists and philosophers.
Which you refuse to do - again your opinion doesn't equal fact.
> Just as I don't need
> to prove that 2 + 2 = 4 or that it's hard to drag
> 6 1/2 million tons up ramps,
Actually you need to demonstrate that your failed geyser/funicular/kite system would have worked - so far you have failed to do so. Its up to you to provide evidence for your ideas.
I also don't need to
> prove the sky is blue or that the language breaks
> Zipf's Law.
Yes you do - why would we believe you when you refuse to provide the evidence that it is? We know why the sky is blue - scientists figured it out and PUBLISHED THE INFORMATION for all to see.
Again Cladking your opinions are worthless. If you refuse to back up your claims I must conclude that you have simply made it up.
I don't need to prove what the
> builders said nor that the entire Pyramids Texts
> is both translated and interpreted only in terms
> of the "book of the dead".
Yes you do if not your idea will simply be ignored - which they are.
These are all simple
> observations of reality and I can't observe
> reality for you.
No they are specific claims by you - its clear you have no evidence to support them so basically you are making false claims. So why not stop lying about them? No scientist will believe anything you say without evidence.
All I can do is ask you to
> respond to the argument instead of semantics and
> the constant repetition of Egyptological beliefs.
So you confirm that none of your claims have any basis in fact and that you've been lying the last 14 years? Check - but we knew that before but its fun to get you to admit just how far you are down the rabbit hole
> I've told you that I believe that Egyptologists
> are wrong about everything.
Who cares? You're an internet nobody who has no evidence....get in line to be ignored...lol
There is no reason to continued this Sam - I come back every once in awhile for YOU to demonstrate that you remain nothing more than an internet eccentric who has no evidence to support any of his ideas.
You aren't worth talking to.