> ...and this is what's so sad.
That you avoided all my questions and think this will work? Yes its sad
Here are ALL my comments again - why not comment on them?
> Like most believers in all things Egyptological
> you are immune to facts and logic.
There you go lying again - why do make up positions for people instead of just asking them?
Oh wait you like to make up stuff! lol
We aren't immune to facts and logic we are knowledgeable and can see you making up complete nonsense, telling lies and frankly irrational.
> When someone tries to point them out in a
> systematic way you call it "losing it".
Yes you were babbling and were losing it - you continue to operate in your self-made fantasy.
> The facts is the "tri-lobed" disc did exist even
> before it was in ruins and had some reason to have
> been made.
We agree its real and existed - but that wasn't in debate. The question was whether your disbelief in the AE religion
The great pyramids did exist before
> they were in ruins and had some reason to have
> been made.
Dang we agree again - amazing - but wait for the completely irrational disconnect coming up.
The words from the Pyramid texts did
> exist even before they were translated and
> interpreted as nonsense by Egyptologists and had a
> reason to have been written.
Ah you're back to lying again - the PT aren't nonsense - that is something YOU made up.
You simply don't
> seem to understand this.
I understand fully that you are making stuff up - you usually do what does the bowl, pyramid and PT have to do with one another? Yep they exist so? We knew that.
> You can't see that
> MOST OF WHAT"S REAL about ancient culture and
> their artefacts aren't even included in
> Egyptological theory.
Oh really - since you don't know much of anything about what the Egyptology theory is - that's a bold statement....
They aren't included
> because they don't fit the assumption/ conclusion
> so they are just ignored.
Okay prove it...oh wait all you do is make claims and never provide evidence - so your claim is ignored. So what does this have to do with the bowl, pyramids and PT?
It is a simple fact
> that the builders said " Bdš.t comes; the
> fire-pan burns.
> Those with (ready) hands stand to
> give an offering to N.".
Yes they (the ancient Egyptian) said those things. Your point is?
This is established fact
> that can't be changed by wishing or my assuming
> it's just stinky footed incantation.
Whose says they need to be changed - what you have to do is prove that they were writing that about that type of ornamental bowl - can you do that? Nope.....can you see the irrationality?
It is as
> real as a heart attack just as the five steps in
> the gravimetric scan are real.
No it isn't it shows a sloping upward passage - you just keep saying that and the rest of us laugh at you. Now they could have built them in that way but that image isn't evidence that they did. No matter how many times you scream it....more irrational statements
> Egyptological interpretations of these that might
> not be real.
Yep scientific theories are always open to new evidence - the problem for you is that you don't have evidence you have your opinion....more irrationality
> Egyptological interpretation has created countless
> mysteries (such as what this object is for).
You mean they have ID then for future consideration. Yep no Egyptologist says that they know everything or that everything has been explained - despite how many times YOU say they do.(more of your lovely lying).
So what does this all have to do with bowl, pyramids and PT existing......will we ever get back to that?
> simply showing an explanation (an interpretation)
> that can eliminate all the mysteries and is
> actually consistent with the evidence and the laws
> of nature.
Cladking your opinions are just that opinions of a person who cannot read the language, dismisses the culture and imagines that the religion didn't exist - your 'opinions' are viewed based on your complete lack of credibility, a long, long history of making stuff up, running from questions, constant lying and refusal to publish any of your research and data.
> The concept of "evidence" is really very simple.
Yet you don't understand it and don't have any...still irrational - bowl, pyramid and PT????
> "Evidence" is that which exists or can be shown to
> exist or have existed. Just because Egyptology
> can't explain most of what exists with their
> interpretations does not make those inexplicable
> things go away.
Whose says it doesn't - oh wait you probably do - not them...again irrationality.
I can't believe these concepts
> can elude you.
Cladking you are again making no sense....look up the word irrational.
> I must believe that with effort
> you could understand every single word and thought
> in this post. You won't, but you could.
I understand them all and they point to be deluded into thinking you have 'answers'. You don't and your 'evidence' is just your uninformed opinion.
We are left with a build up based on bowl, pyramid and PT...you go whacko.....
The above is full of your deliberately stating whoppers then making stuff up.
Typical Sam - useless but funny