> I beieve the Aubrey circle is designed to locate
> real Pi and wrote so in my last book. Why?
> The answer is in understanding the Thom Pi unit
> discovered by using the Aubrey circle it is not
> The perimeter is fixed but the diameter is a
> 897.6 / (1760/560) = 285.60
> 897.6 / (1632/520) = 286.00
> difference is 0.4 units and this is a sliding Pi
> scale against the two versions of Pi being used
> the shorter the daimeter the greater the value for
> pi so 22/7 is greater than real pi and 1632/520 is
> less than real Pi and somewhere in between is real
> Pi and the sliding scale is in my previous
> You can have any number of values for pi by
> varying 0.4 but for example making it 1000 by x
> A fixed known circumference and a variable
> diameter where two different values one on each
> side of Pi have been established.
> 897.6 / 285.8 = 3.140657803 the in between value
> 285.7142857 the diameter giving 3.1416.
> It is a pi location system.
> using this system i located the value of pi that
> works with the Harris and Stockdale megalithic
> foot and it is 3.142666667 a diameter of
> 3.1426666r x 3 = 9.428 and square is 9.876353778
> getting very close to 9.87654321 a beautiful
> Egyptian number as 3.125 x 256/81.
> this version is exactly 16499/16500 x 22/7
> Egyptian numbers.
> No one has bothered about the Harris abd Stockdale
> megalithic foot but they should be ( Harry
> Sivertsen excluded he has written about it)
> I doff my cap to Peter Harris and his 40 years of
> research in all weathers in the English country
> side and beyond and his phenomenal little book.
> and magisterchessmut too!!
> just noticed on this thread
> 'As an addendum to this inquiry of the application
> of Pi values to areas instead of circumferences, I
> would like to point out that the first mentioned
> derivative of the MY at 272.25, being 1/8th of the
> Old Scottish bushel unit of 2178 cu/ins., does
> factor into an equivalent 2/1 ratio to 385. Or
> very nearly so as, 385sq./272.25sq. x 9801/9800 =
> 2. '
The radius and diameter of the Moon and Earth are the universal and timeless measuring units.
What is the relationship "ergo" pi with the radius of the Earth and the Moon?
DavidK remember that the metric units that you use are:
366,6666666666667 * 24 = 8800 (Anglo-American imperial system based on esotericism, Civilization One (A Sociological Conspiracy) by Christopher Knight;Alan Butler), this is the biblical Gog system from Magog)
355,5555555555555 * 1,018518518518518*1,0125=
355,5555555555555 * 1,018518518518518=362,139917695473
362,139917695473*1,62(synchronous ratio Earth / Moon)=586,6666666666663
2503111,11111111/86400=28,97119341563785 (synodic month type a)
586,6666666666663/20=synodic month type a
synodic month type a*1,0125=synodic month type b
synodic month type b * 12= lunar year(imperial system)
lunar year(imperial system) /1,008/1008=diametr of the moon(decimal system) .The imperial system and the decimal system are related to each other in appropriate proportions, scales, relations. They complement each other.
3520 (diametr of the Moon) / 1,008(synchronism between: the imperial system and the decimal system)/1,008= (diametr of the moon)=3464,348702443941
an alternative system without resorting to esoterics:
3528/1,008/1,008=3472,222222222222 (The polar diameter of the Moon)
The polar diameter of the Moon is 3,471.94 km(source of Nasa information)
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 28-Jun-18 12:57 by rodz111.